Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC? (Read 2687 times)
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Jun 3rd, 2011 at 4:37pm
 
The Coalition has 19/42 seats. The Christian Democrats have 2, and the Shooters have 2. The ALP and Greens are redundant, they have no say.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #1 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:10pm
 
Yep..the neo cons wet dream..an all out despot dictatorship
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #2 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:19pm
 
at least it isnt about Oakeshott so thats a first. I wonder if matty realises there are other states than NSW?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #3 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:53pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:19pm:
at least it isnt about Oakeshott so thats a first. I wonder if matty realises there are other states than NSW?


Why bring up Oakeshott when I didn't even mention him?

Yes, by the way, I do know that.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #4 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 9:34pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:53pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:19pm:
at least it isnt about Oakeshott so thats a first. I wonder if matty realises there are other states than NSW?


Why bring up Oakeshott when I didn't even mention him?

Yes, by the way, I do know that.



then act like it. try a thread that deals with someone besides oakeshott and a state besides NSW. if people were able to filter posts and simply used NSW and Oakeshott, you'd be invisible.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
astro_surf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #5 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 12:31am
 
Matty just refuses to understand the concept of a Westminster democracy. Why do you hate democracy so much, matty?
Back to top
 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 11:23am:
So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&
 
IP Logged
 
creep
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1881
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #6 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 7:48am
 
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 4:37pm:
The Coalition has 19/42 seats. The Christian Democrats have 2, and the Shooters have 2. The ALP and Greens are redundant, they have no say.



It is true that the Greens are a dead party, the ALP will recover though.

Where do you get your results of 19/42 etc from?

As wasn't the result:
Coaltion: 67
ALP:       18
Other:      3


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/state-election-2011/interactive-map
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
nairbe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2587
Rural NSW
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #7 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:15pm
 
creep wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 7:48am:
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 4:37pm:
The Coalition has 19/42 seats. The Christian Democrats have 2, and the Shooters have 2. The ALP and Greens are redundant, they have no say.



It is true that the Greens are a dead party, the ALP will recover though.

Where do you get your results of 19/42 etc from?

As wasn't the result:
Coaltion: 67
ALP:       18
Other:      3


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/state-election-2011/interactive-map


I believe matty is talking of the upper house of the NSW parlament. And yes i do agree with Astro it is called democracy and it does matter that all have their say. By your reckoning one would say that in the senate the coalition are meaningless. I hardly see that, and opposition is important to the maintenance of a healthy democracy.

Just because the minors are parties like fred nile and the greens they are not all useless. The shooters and fishing party are strange bed fellows and may appear single issued but the issues over fishing and shooting rights are a big issue in this state as soon as you step outside the vacuum of Sydney. It is more about the way NSW State government has for 30 years been city centric and the nationals have done zip to help. They represent the frustration of the rural minority that produce more of the countries real wealth than seems to be understood by the city folk with tunnel vision.
Back to top
 

"Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage."
Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
creep
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1881
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #8 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:27pm
 
nairbe wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:15pm:
creep wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 7:48am:
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 4:37pm:
The Coalition has 19/42 seats. The Christian Democrats have 2, and the Shooters have 2. The ALP and Greens are redundant, they have no say.



It is true that the Greens are a dead party, the ALP will recover though.

Where do you get your results of 19/42 etc from?

As wasn't the result:
Coaltion: 67
ALP:       18
Other:      3


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/state-election-2011/interactive-map


I believe matty is talking of the upper house of the NSW parlament.



Yes of course, thanks, missed the LC
And Labour & the Greens have 19/42 as well.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
nairbe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2587
Rural NSW
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #9 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 9:39pm
 
creep wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:27pm:
nairbe wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 5:15pm:
creep wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 7:48am:
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 4:37pm:
The Coalition has 19/42 seats. The Christian Democrats have 2, and the Shooters have 2. The ALP and Greens are redundant, they have no say.



It is true that the Greens are a dead party, the ALP will recover though.

Where do you get your results of 19/42 etc from?

As wasn't the result:
Coaltion: 67
ALP:       18
Other:      3


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/state-election-2011/interactive-map


I believe matty is talking of the upper house of the NSW parlament.



Yes of course, thanks, missed the LC
And Labour & the Greens have 19/42 as well.


That right lab/Green 19, lib/nat 19 and 4 to minors that for me are conservative votes. Fred Nile is obvious and the others are country votes mostly and they are generally more conservative.
Back to top
 

"Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage."
Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #10 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:19pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 9:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:53pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2011 at 5:19pm:
at least it isnt about Oakeshott so thats a first. I wonder if matty realises there are other states than NSW?


Why bring up Oakeshott when I didn't even mention him?

Yes, by the way, I do know that.



then act like it. try a thread that deals with someone besides oakeshott and a state besides NSW. if people were able to filter posts and simply used NSW and Oakeshott, you'd be invisible.


I have started threads about other topics as well.  Smiley
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #11 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:21pm
 
My whole point is that the Coalition only needs the support of the Christian Democrats or Shooters to pass legislation. Both are right wing, therefore making 23/42, hence Grabor are redundant.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
creep
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1881
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #12 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:30pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:21pm:
My whole point is that the Coalition only needs the support of the Christian Democrats or Shooters to pass legislation. Both are right wing, therefore making 23/42, hence Grabor are redundant.




Yes, in theory you'd think that that would be so.
But at the 2010 fed election the National Party (WA) (Crook) didnt automatically side with the coalition.
And the three independents (Oakeshott, Windsor & Katter) were all former National party members.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #13 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:36pm
 
creep wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:30pm:
matty wrote on Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:21pm:
My whole point is that the Coalition only needs the support of the Christian Democrats or Shooters to pass legislation. Both are right wing, therefore making 23/42, hence Grabor are redundant.




Yes, in theory you'd think that that would be so.
But at the 2010 fed election the National Party (WA) (Crook) didnt automatically side with the coalition.
And the three independents (Oakeshott, Windsor & Katter) were all former National party members.


As if Crook was not ever going to side with the Coalition. Katter did eventually side with them too. Windsor is bitter, and Oakeshott ALP in drag.

Fred Nile (and the other CD, Paul Green) will pretty much always side with the Coalition, and the Shooters will too. They certainly won't side with the greens.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: What's the point the ALP and Greens in the NSW LC?
Reply #14 - Jun 4th, 2011 at 10:40pm
 
hey matty I klnow this is off topic... but as you seem to know more than the average joe on here regarding our independents....

what have any of them said about this Malaysian policy we are hering so much about....I seem to have missed anything coming from them about it.. what have you heard?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print