Lestat wrote on Jul 19^th, 2011 at 9:58am:


The rules governing Apostasy in Islam are derived from the Hadiths and not Sharia. The Qur'an itself has no earthly punishment for apostasy against Islamic faith. This is why the penalties are so varied from the death penalty to no action at all.

Sappho wrote on Aug 7^th, 2011 at 4:25pm:


Sharia law is mostly derived from the Hadiths...so I'm not sure what your point is.

freediver wrote on Aug 9^th, 2011 at 4:03pm:


Slow? Why are you such a liar. Like do you not have any shame?

You did not provide a link to the thread, despite me asking you to do so twice now.

And now you claim that you did provide a link...even though anyone can quite easily take a look at the page before this one and see that you did not.

This, plus the fact that the debate has never been about the punishment of apostasy, but in fact the question of what apostasy laws relate to, just once again shows what kind of a moron you really are.

But you already know that don't you Freediver....you can do no more then resort to taking abu out of context, and then use it to make a point...when ironically it has very little to do with what we were arguing about in the first place.

Or perhaps you can tell me what exactly is Abu's out of context quote got to do with me telling you (and providing evidence) that the apostasy laws in Islam, and its punishment relates to 'treason'.

'Treason'...do you get it, or do you need me to dumb it down for you further.

Sheesh, your ignorance can sometimes be so fustrating to deal with. Why do you just wear people down with your stupidity? Is this all you can rely upon?

OK Les. Here is the link again. I will make it bold and colourful so that you may see it this time.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1223540962/0#6

Quote:


You cannot actually see the absence of something. However the link is there. You should try looking for yourself.

Quote:


And yet that is what we are arguing about, is it not?