Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
Send Topic Print
In defence of Islam (Read 18668 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #15 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:12am
 
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?



Lestat,

I think that what you really meant to say , was;

"Apart from myself,    ....does anyone else read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?"



Clearly you yourself, peruse my posts Lestat.     Grin
Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #16 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:25am
 
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?


Yes, it would suit your islamist ideals if Yadda would discontinue posting the truth I would imagine.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #17 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:03pm
 
On the contrary we love Yadda posting here, he makes a good case for why Christians are loons and Muslims have a right to be upset.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Lestat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1403
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #18 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:10pm
 
Yadda wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:12am:
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?



Lestat,

I think that what you really meant to say , was;

"Apart from myself,    ....does anyone else read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?"



Clearly you yourself, peruse my posts Lestat.     Grin


haha...yeah, of course I do Yadda. I love reading your posts.

Who am I to correct your delusional fantasies. lol
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lestat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1403
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #19 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:15pm
 
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:25am:
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?


Yes, it would suit your islamist ideals if Yadda would discontinue posting the truth I would imagine.


hehe, a zionist talking about the 'truth'. Now there's an oxymoron if I've ever seen one.

Though it doesn't surprise me that you find his 'cut and pastes' appealing. Pigs like to gather together, and roll in the mud.

Cheesy

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #20 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 3:10pm
 
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:15pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:25am:
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?


Yes, it would suit your islamist ideals if Yadda would discontinue posting the truth I would imagine.


hehe, a zionist talking about the 'truth'. Now there's an oxymoron if I've ever seen one.


Though it doesn't surprise me that you find his 'cut and pastes' appealing. Pigs like to gather together, and roll in the mud.






Lestat,

You speak of a 'Zionist', as though 'Zionist' was a 'dirty' word.



Lestat,

Do you know, that the chief 'Zionist', is the God of Israel ?


Psalms 87:2
The LORD loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob.
3  Glorious things are spoken of thee, O city of God. Selah.


Psalms 137:1
By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.
2  We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof.
3  For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion.
4  How shall we sing the LORD'S song in a strange land?
5  If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.
6  If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy.
Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Rase it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof.


Isaiah 62:1
For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth.
2  And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name.
3  Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the LORD, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God.
4  Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzibah, and thy land Beulah: for the LORD delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married.
5  For as a young man marrieth a virgin, so shall thy sons marry thee: and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee.
I have set watchmen upon thy walls, O Jerusalem, which shall never hold their peace day nor night: ye that make mention of the LORD, keep not silence,
7  And give him no rest, till he establish, and till he make Jerusalem a praise in the earth
.


Zechariah 12:1
The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
2  Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.
3  And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.




Lestat,

You have a hatred for 'the Zionists' [i.e. those who love Jerusalem] ???

Listen to what the God of Israel says to those who speak, and boast, against him, the chief Zionist...

Ezekiel 35:10
Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess it; whereas the LORD was there:
11  Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will even do according to thine anger, and according to thine envy which thou hast used out of thy hatred against them; and I will make myself known among them, when I have judged thee.
12  And thou shalt know that I am the LORD, and that I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, They are laid desolate, they are given us to consume.
13  Thus with your mouth ye have boasted against me, and have multiplied your words against me: I have heard them.


Moslems....

They are those people who are too proud [in their own heart] to listen to God.

They are those who dare to boast themselves, against God.



Psalms 83:1
Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
2  For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
3  They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4  They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5  For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
6  The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes;
7  Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
8  Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah.

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #21 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 3:35pm
 
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:10pm:
Yadda wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:12am:
Lestat wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am:
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?



Lestat,

I think that what you really meant to say , was;

"Apart from myself,    ....does anyone else read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?"



Clearly you yourself, peruse my posts Lestat.     Grin


haha...yeah, of course I do Yadda. I love reading your posts.


Who am I to correct your delusional fantasies. lol




I know that that statement, is another moslem lie.

In Sharia jurisdictions, people like me, are murdered by moslems, for 'insulting' ISLAM.

IMAGE...
...



FROM ALLAH'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR MOSLEMS

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world..."
Koran 5.33


Yadda, the 'mischief' maker.

I say, the truth teller.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #22 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 5:28pm
 
Quote:
Muslim is not a race, but Muslims are overwhelmingly of racial backgrounds "different" to most Australians, hence the perception of Muslims as a "foreign race".

So in the minds of the ignorant (ie. about 95% of people on this forum), "islamics" is a race. Except when it doesn't suit them, and they want to avoid charges of racism and bigotry, when it all of a sudden becomes just a religion.

Unfortunately the definition of 'race' is now being defined by political jargon (and left wing jargon at that).
Much like whites are 'christian' and arabs are 'muslim', so in marxist/frankfurt school theory changing ones religion should change ones race. Biologically this cannot be done, however in a political context it can if you believe race to be a 'social construct'. To go against the laws of nature in this way is pure atheism and yet so-called 'liberation christians' do so willingly. In that case they are not christian because their belief is atheistic so their belief is actually atheism.

Quote:
So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM, the 'religion', promotes violence towards, and intolerance of, all non-moslems.
[e.g. Koran 2.98  Koran 9.123]

So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM is a vicious political and 'religious' tyranny, which has always encouraged the murder of its critics.
[e.g. Koran 5.33  Koran 33.60,61]

So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM encourages, as a 'virtue', political and 'religious' fascism.
[e.g. Koran 9.29  Koran 3.85]

Because those who oppose ISLAM are NOT motivated by any sense of outrage at the injustices which are being promoted by ISLAM, and its followers.

Those who are critical of, and oppose ISLAM, are motivated by [their] racism, and are clearly racists.
/sarc off

Same thing can be said of atheism and yet it seems you do not have a problem with that.

Quote:
Google;
taqiyya - the muslim doctrine of deceit

Google;
we smile to the face "while our hearts curse them"

Taqiyya applies to shiites and not all muslims as a whole.
As for your 2nd 'google' that too also applies to atheists and labor party members for that matter.

Quote:
Moslems will claim that those who oppose moslem violence [to spread ISLAM], are 'racists'.

Moslems will claim that those who oppose moslem supremacism, are 'racists'.

Because, it is those 'racist' non-moslems who resist the spread of the influence of ISLAM, which cause moslem violence.  [<---- moslem 'logic' expressed]

Did I not explain that 'race' is currently and unfortunately defined by politics instead of religion.
Why dont you 'google' racism and the frankfurt school for that matter?
You will find that the frankfurt school invented the term 'racism' and it only applies to whites. It is political capital.

Quote:
hehe, a zionist talking about the 'truth'. Now there's an oxymoron if I've ever seen one.

Zionists claim that Israel is a state for all jews and yet the askhenazi majority treat the sephardim as 2nd class citizens and its falashas and samaritans as garbage and yet would claim 'all jews are equal'.
If the askhenazi went back to azerbaijan where their ancestors originally came from (they are turkic not semites) then maybe this problem would go away.

Quote:
Do you know, that the chief 'Zionist', is the God of Israel ?

Hardly, zionism was founded on a cultural and racial (turanians only) basis. The founders of zionism were decidedly atheist.
The re-establishment of 'israel' can only be done by God (the only one ever).
To believe otherwise goes against prophecy, again another atheist trait.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #23 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 9:10pm
 
leon_the_14 wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:46am:
Since when is 'muslim' a race?


Hey don't tell me tell the muslims who like to scream racist or racism when it suits them. Start with Carnita Matthews.
Back to top
 

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #24 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:07pm
 
Quote:
The method of execution is not important.


So you see no difference between lethal injection and stoning to death? Are you aware of the correct Islamic procedure for stoning people to death? It is not quick and it is not painless.

Quote:
'Cheating child brides?' Assuming due process such as a fair trial and non bias in laying charges has been done. Then I wouldnt oppose it


So what matters is that the court gets the facts right, not whether the child actually deserves to die such a horrible death? You value procedure over justice?

Quote:
if it the standard punishment practiced by that racial group/community then it is not up to me to interfere as I wouldnt want that group to interfere with my community.


Is there no level of degradation that would make you want to interfere to protect the victims of another 'community'? How is this any different from our government interfering in abusive cults?

Quote:
If it were in my community then I would want all the facts before saying yes or no to any charges or sentence.


Suppose she really did cheat on the dirty old pedophile her parents convinced her to marry? Should she be stoned to death?

Quote:
Provided due process in charge and trial has been done then I wouldnt oppose it. After all, atheists would quite happily kill believers.


So you really do value procedure over justice? Anything goes, so long as the paperwork is in order?

Quote:
Dunno.....ask someone who lived in an eastern bloc country. Or better still ring someone in N.Korea, their first hand experience should be truthful.


You don't have an opinion on destroying democracy and denying people fudnamental human rights? Is this the sort of disinterest it takes to speak out in defense of Islam?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #25 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:25pm
 
Quote:
Hey don't tell me tell the muslims who like to scream racist or racism when it suits them. Start with Carnita Matthews.

She is a habitualy bad driver with a rap sheet as long as your arm.
She didnt realise she was being videoed when she did her act, she didnt do it for the courts rather she did it to intimidate the officer. It was to imply that she would complain to the politically correct police apparatchiks, the same bureaucracy that accepted her complaint without ID or proof in the 1st place.
She only did what every other offender would do in that position, playing the race card was wrong and the police were wrong in accepting it.

Quote:
So you see no difference between lethal injection and stoning to death? Are you aware of the correct Islamic procedure for stoning people to death? It is not quick and it is not painless.

When youre dead, youre dead

Quote:
So what matters is that the court gets the facts right, not whether the child actually deserves to die such a horrible death? You value procedure over justice?

No, justice is decided on the law, the facts and the judgment is decided by the community. That is the procedure.

Quote:
Is there no level of degradation that would make you want to interfere to protect the victims of another 'community'?

It depends where that community is.
If it is within Australia, then one would expect the law to intervene. Or if it doesnt then it is up to its citizens to cause it to.
However because of political correctness and corruption the law is not applied uniformly.
If it is overseas then you can act as a private person to interfere but you shouldnt expect your government to act solely on your behalf and opinion.

Quote:
How is this any different from our government interfering in abusive cults?

If the cults are in Australia then they are subject to Australian laws

Quote:
Suppose she really did cheat on the dirty old pedophile her parents convinced her to marry? Should she be stoned to death?

I take it that you are referring to a preteen girl who commits adultery while married to an adult male? Again, let the community decide.
What I find more disturbing about your question is that being you seem to find it wrong that she is married to a pedophile and yet think its not a big deal to sleep around with others

Quote:
So you really do value procedure over justice? Anything goes, so long as the paperwork is in order?

Law + facts + community x judgment = justice
Not political correctness which drowns justice in ideology procedures, bureaucracy and old fashioned self interest and corruption

Quote:
You don't have an opinion on destroying democracy and denying people fudnamental human rights? Is this the sort of disinterest it takes to speak out in defense of Islam?

Since when did the peoples and nations of the world appoint you to be their saviour?
Did you bother to ask them, or just appoint yourself because you are 'all wise'??
Plenty of ways to get to Libya and Yemen you know, I'm sure theres a spare place in the trench at the front line.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5396
Gender: male
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #26 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:45pm
 
This thread is interesting.  As an agnostic I find it strange that any person can claim to know Gods will, let alone have recieved a complete set of instructions on how ones life should be led. If God exists, (and I do not claim that he doesn't) what makes anyone think that an all powerful entity either wants  or needs your worship or really cares what you do?
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Lestat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1403
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #27 - Jun 30th, 2011 at 9:18am
 
Belgarion wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 11:45pm:
This thread is interesting.  As an agnostic I find it strange that any person can claim to know Gods will, let alone have recieved a complete set of instructions on how ones life should be led. If God exists, (and I do not claim that he doesn't) what makes anyone think that an all powerful entity either wants  or needs your worship or really cares what you do?


Interesting you bring this up. This is what agnostics (and athiests for that matter) do not or do not want to understand.

You are right in one respect though...God does not need our worship. Whether we worship God or not, does not make one iota of a difference to His Glory, His Power.

God does not want us to worship Him for His sake...It is for 'OUR" sake. Worshipping God is not for 'His' beneift, it is for 'our' benefit.

When I pray my daily prayers, it is for my benefit, not His. God does not 'need' our prayers...you are correct. But he does 'want' our prayers. Why? Because he loves us, he created us.

There is a hadith, where it is stated that God gave only a fraction of the love He feels (1%) to the world and mankind. Thats to say, of all the love that is felt on earth throughout the ages, all the love a mother has for her child, or vice versa. A father for thier son, and vice versa. A husband for his wife, and vice versa. All this love, is only a fraction of the love that God has us.

He wants the best for us...and the best for us, is to worship Him. This is what we know. We don't know why, we don't know how, but we do know HE is our creator, and HE wants whats best for us.

Now the choice is ours. Either we reject His Message, reject His advice, reject His love. Or accept it.

As for your first question. We (muslims) know...from the Quran, and the example set from the last of His prophets. The Quran is the world of God, protected by Him, and the only of the scriptures that has stood the test of time, word for word, letter for letter, in its original form.

It is these words that have made grown men cry, these words that have inspired and brought down empires...it is the book that impacts those that read it in ways you cannot imagine.

It was these words, and His prophet, that inspired the most backwards of people at the time, to rise to one of the greatest empires this world has ever seen. The only true 'Kingdom of God', foretold by prophets before which the Christians are still ignorantly waiting for.

Unless you have actually read it for yourself, whole, with an open mind, then you cannot understand.

Of course, if you choose to take Yadda's cut and pastes, which I, as others have shown previously to be deliberate misleading quotes, or taken out of context (yes, I have actually found his quotes to be in fact blatant lies..he changes a word here, or a word there, which completely changes the meaning of the sentence..when this has been highlighted to him, he just replies with another half page cut and paste...gets boring really) as the text and meaning of the Quran...or what the media and anti-islamic sites tell you...well thats your perogative.

And your loss!
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 30th, 2011 at 9:30am by Lestat »  
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #28 - Jun 30th, 2011 at 11:31am
 
leon_the_14 wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
Google;
taqiyya - the muslim doctrine of deceit

Google;
we smile to the face "while our hearts curse them"


Taqiyya applies to shiites and not all muslims as a whole.






Many ISLAMIC sources, would offer a different opinion.

And perhaps offer even, that your entire response in this forum is just another exposition of the art of Taqiyya, against the naive, and the uninformed.



e.g. #1,
Quote:

"I intend to demonstrate and prove that the concept of "al-Taqiyya" is an
integral part of Islam, and that it is NOT a Shi'ite concoction."



http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter6b/1.html


e.g. #2,
Quote:

"                    TAQIYYAH (CALCULATED DECEPTION)



                  Sunnis                Shi'ites



It is defined as presenting an       In spite of the differences among

outer appearance that belies         the various Shi'ite sects, they all

what one conceals inside, to pro-    agree that taqiyyah is a prescrib-

tect oneself from harm. It is con-   ed duty and a pillar of their faith.

sidered impermissible for a          Their school of thought could

Muslim to deceive other              not stand without it. They learn

Muslims, because of the Pro-         its principles and methods and

phet's saying: Whoever deceives      they practice it, especially if they

is not one of us." Resorting to      are in dire circumstances. They

taqiyyah is permitted only in some   exaggeratedly praise and flatter

special situations, like jihad       those whom they consider

against those disbelievers who       disbelievers, whom they con-

persecute Muslims. That is part of   sider deserving of slaughter and

the etiquette of war. It is incum-   destruction. The verdict of kufr is

bent on the Muslim to be truthful    passed on anyone who is not of

and courageous in upholding the      their sectarian school, and for

truth, and to be neither osten-      them "the end justifies the

tatious, nor deceiving, nor          means." Their ethics allow every

treacherous. He should give          manner of lying, cunning and

sincere counsel, enjoin what is      deception.

good and forbid what is evil."



http://www.amislam.com/khutoot2.htm#TAQIYYAHileon_the_14 wrote on Jun 29th, 2011 at 5:28pm:

As for your 2nd 'google' that too also applies to atheists and labor party members for that matter.





Maybe atheists and labour party members are not always candid in expressing their real views, but i do not know of any who threaten to murder, those who do not believe, what they believe, or threaten to murder those who resist their authority.

Moslems do.


FROM ALLAH'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR MOSLEMS

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world..."
Koran 5.33

"those who wage war against Allah and His messenger"
???


The above wording is pure ISLAMIC sophistry, to justify a 'retaliation' against Allah's enemies.

e.g.
According to moslems, those who resist Allah's will, are real terrorists.

While those moslem cadres who murder 'unbelievers' in markets with bombs, are merely doing 'good works', to 'defend' ISLAM.




e.g.

Quote:

Bashir calls bombers 'counter-terrorists'
June 26, 2007
HARDLINE Islamic cleric Abu Bakar Bashir said today that extremists blamed for Indonesian bombings were role models for other Muslims and feted them as "counter-terrorists."
"There are no terrorists in Indonesia. What there are, are counter-terrorists," Bashir said.
......But he called on Indonesian Muslims to refrain from accusing people of terrorism, saying it would be tantamount to assisting the US.
Bashir spoke at a press conference to announce plans, together with 13 lawyers from the "Team for the Defence of Muslims," to file a suit demanding that Indonesia's counter-terrorism police unit be disbanded.
Lawyer Munarman alleged that the counter-terrorism squad was financed opaquely by the US, sought to make war against Islam and used torture to secure admissions from suspects.
He also said that the squad was discriminatory as it only acted against Muslims, adding the team planned to file the suit on tomorrow at the South Jakarta district court.
Bashir has redoubled his efforts to get Sharia law enforced in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, since his release from prison.



http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21973518-23109,00.html

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #29 - Jun 30th, 2011 at 12:42pm
 
Well I must've taken the express class, because in all my years of studying Islam, I never came across the material about taqiyyah you're posting Yadda. As leon said, I've only ever heard of it in terms of the Shi'a, that they use it to conceal themselves amongst mainstream Muslims.

The only thing remotely close to what you're saying, that I've heard briefly taught is that if you are facing death, then pretending to revoke Islam is no sin upon you, if it saves your life.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
Send Topic Print