Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print
In defence of Islam (Read 18657 times)
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
In defence of Islam
Jun 26th, 2011 at 9:22pm
 
Praise the name of Jehovah
His unity is in his oness
God, Lord and Creator is he and he alone
He is the God of Adam
He is the God of Moses
He is the God of Jesus
He is the God of Mohammed
He is the God of All
Praise his name

I am not writing this to promote the interests of any particular sect or defined religion for that matter. I am writing this because I am sick of people rubbishing the God of Abraham via the various sects and religions pertaining to him. The only creatures who have an interest in opposing the God of Abraham are atheists and satanists, the satanists play the pipe and dickhead atheists dance to their tune.

For the record I am a monotheist. I only believe in the God of Abraham, to me his name is Jehovah. With muslims he is called Allah and jews call him Yahweh, for the metaphysical/esoterically minded he is known as YHVH.
There is no other God....period.

I am not a muslim as it is accepted at the moment, muslims largely donot regard me as one because although I have no problem with the Koran I donot accept the Hadith. In the same way I do not accept supposed sayings of Jesus, especially the ones being touted in left wing churches. Now marxist clergy spout their godless ideology with old English idioms and simply claim that Jesus said them. The same with the hadith, apparantely Mohammed is still issuing his sayings but now it is in urdu. What makes it worse is that it is being peddled by illiterate paki mullahs and worse than that is that their followers accept it unquestionably because they have no access to information to compare it with.
So what is the problem people have with islam?
OK lets be brutally honest....
No drinking
No gambling
No pork
No adultery

I'll tell you a story, a 'christian' guy i knew went into a halal restuarant one Easter and wished the owner a happy easter. He then went on to do this to the others there eating, one muslim replied 'bugger you and bugger your Jesus!' The other muslims there took umbrage at this guy, telling this clown that as a muslim he should never say this. A week later he invited me for lunch, i went to see him. He then said he wanted to go to the halal resturant to which I agreed, he then took out a bottle of wine from the fridge and said he wanted to drink it there. I said if it was a halal restuarant then you cant drink there, he said that the owner allowed it (i'd never been there before so i did not know). When we arrived there I saw that it was definitely a halal restuarant, i told him that as a halal restuarant that it cannot have alcohol on the premises. I just assumed he would leave the bottle in the brown paper bag, so we sat down and placed our orders. He asked a member of staff for 2 glasses and a pitcher of water, as i was about to pour the water he said no. Then he took the bottle of wine out of the bag and slammed it on the table obviously trying to get the attention of other diners. As nearly all the other diners were white nobody gave a poo. He then said in a low rent public housing type drawl "IMA OZ-TRAY-LUN AND IM ALLOWD TA DRINK WHEREVER I DAM WELL WANT!!!!!!!!!"
As i said noone gave a poo about the wine or rant, i realised that his 'invitation' to lunch was a setup and he wanted me there as a backup in case things turned nasty.
As far as he was concerned he was a 'good christian' and yet indulges in every vice he can (whores, stealing, etc).

I've come across these sorts of people before, if a preacher says that drinking, gambling, whores etc. are bad he is deemed to be a religious nutjob or 'too conservative' and yet if the local mullah says the same thing then the response is 'i'm a christian! i'm allowed to do these things! this is my country bugger off back to baghdad!'
And if you ask where Jesus gives the thumbs up to these thing in the Bible, the response is 'i'm a (insert whatever nationality here) if you dont like it bugger off back with the rest of them!'

So what are these people actually defending? Their country of birth? Their religion? Or their lifestyle?
I'm going with the last one, For as much as they claim to love their nation and religion ultimately all they really care about is getting pissed and getting their dicks sucked. The nation/religion thing is just a barrier between their lifestyle and anything that would threaten it.
This applies to the stereotypes of redneck and marxist cracka

A nation is based on its communites and communities are based on families and the links between them. The economy of the community is based and functions on the needs and services provided by its individual members. There is a reciprical and complementary economy functioning from it. So WTF does the likes of drink and gambling contribute to such an economy? Nothing, the 'benefits' of drinking are only of a temporary nature and gambling relies on a 99% failure rate for the 'winners' to make any substantial income from it. If the love of money is the root of all evil, then greed is the impetus of that evil and failure is the impetus of both.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #1 - Jun 26th, 2011 at 9:24pm
 
For those who say that their nationally is the excuse to participate in activities that are currently deemed 'un-islamic' i would ask why would you support activities that act against the core of what your nation is built on, that being the community? If your nations' economy would collapse without drinking, gambling, porn, and prostitution would you be honestly able to believe that you live in a nation and are of equal value to every other citizen in that nation, or at least are equal to everyone else in your community (if you are actually in one)??
Are you the citizen of a nation or a member of staff in a anything for a buck corporation or some fringe dweller in a soweto type shantytown?

OK lets go through the bellyaches quickly.....

Islam is against drinking!
So are some other christian sects, so is alcoholics anonymous, cops and paramedics who have to attend motor accidents because some front bottom guzzled a bucket of beer and got behind the wheel. Doctors tend to feel the same when they treat alcoholics for liver damage or treat people who get beer bottles busted over their heads by the usual binge drinkers who hit the streets every friday and saturday night.

Islam is against gambling!
So are some other christian sects, so is gamblers anonymous as well as charities that have to deal with individuals and families that live on the breadline because of the psychological compulsion of 1 or 2 family members. Do some people gamble for recreation or the thrill? Some not all, most people do so because they dont believe they have any other way to make a decent sum of money to support their families/selves.

Islam is against pork!
FFS is eating pig meat that smacking important to you! Every Christmas people binge out on drink, pork and shellfish and every Christmas the hospitals fill up with slobs suffering food poisoning. I'm not pro or anti pork either way, if you like guzzling beer and gulping hot dogs then dont blame muslims if you end up in hospital with coronary problems. Muslims didnt force you to eat it and nor would they.

Islam is against adultery!
I thought that marriage was between 2 people, apparantley not in the West. You can say 'I do', walk out of the church and straight into a brothel or go bugger the local football team and it is your legal right to. People bitch that islam is against sex, well when you see how quicker and larger muslim generations reproduce I would say that is hardly the case. How they behave on the street and how they behave in the bedroom are 2 different things.

So are the 'unacceptable' islamic values actually just common sense? Well....does not the West have education systems that indoctrinate their children (victims???) not to use common sense and actually to oppose it?....or else redefine it?

Lets look at other things islam haters use.....

Islam is an arab religion for arabs only!
Wrong. Only 15% of muslims are arab (by race), you might throw in another 10% for half castes and mongrels as well as those who are arab by culture eg. Berbers, Somalis etc. Wonder why it is forbidden to draw Mohammed? Well according to the few written descriptions about him he had red/auburn hair and his nephew Ali (Nazrath Ali) had brown hair, hardly the traits of todays arabs. Chances are that when the golden horde left a good deal of dna as they swept through. Just like todays 'jews' largely are not descendants of Biblical era Israelites, todays arabs are most likely not pure semites. Does this make Mohammed a different dna makeup as compared to todays arabs? Maybe, but linguistically and culturally they are both still arabs. If islam was for arabs (at least by biogocal race) only then the numbers of muslims would be reduced by 75%.
Islam was originally about returning people to the God of Abraham, it regarded judaism and christianity as taken a wrong turn (cant disagree). It recognised that some jews and christians were practicing their faith as it was meant to be and that these people were already muslims even though they didnt realise it.
A muslim is a muslim regardless of whatever language, race or culture they use/practice as long as they adhere to the principles of islam.

Islam is full of terrorists!
What the bugger is the difference between a 200lb truck bomb detonating in a city street and a 200lb bomb being dropped on the same location by a jet? And what is the difference between those doing the deed?
I suppose it depends on whose interests they serve.

Example....
The invasion and occupation of iraq was deemed to be the decent thing to do, those who ordered it knew it was the financial thing to do (self interest, improving the lifestyle). When casualties began increasing among the occupational nations then the calls of 'islamic barbarians' started in earnest. Same people said that iraq must be occupied because it was 'the right thing to do', 'necessary for democracy' and.....'the christian thing to do'
If the vested interests who were looking for financial gain had their way then there would have been porn shops and sleazy bars on every street corner and probably a smacking casino in baghdad. Does this sound 'christian' to you? I suppose for most of the 'christians' who rebirth themselves whenever the issue of islam comes up then the answer would probably be yes (only because it opposes their atheist lifestyle)
Was it a christian thing to do? No.
Was it the atheist thing to do? Absolutely.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #2 - Jun 26th, 2011 at 9:25pm
 
To otherthrow a government is one thing, to seek to corrupt and destroy the communities of that nation is something else.
People by and large unfortunantely find their sense of reality from the TV, not from day to day life in the community because communities have by and large been white anted by the vices that islam opposes. So when people of the mid-east see DVDs and videos of movies that portray gangsters as successful businessmen, serial killers as celebrities and teenagers having orgies by the age of 16 as the norm, well I can fully understand why members of mid-eastern communities go around setting up IEDs wherever western forces are. I dont blame them I wouldnt want that sort of poo in my nation either.
The west seriously underestimated the value of family and community in iraq because it assumed that the same standards of degeneracy in the west were actually global.

Islam worships a moon god!
Then Adam, Moses and Jesus must have worshipped a moon god too. Allah was always the only God in arab tribes originally, but corruption set in and other gods were added so as to make the original faith of monotheism into a pagan one. Much the same in christianity to the extent that catholicism can be deemed to be seperate from the rest of the christian sects. Catholics pray to Father, Son, Holy Spirit, the Virgin Mary as well as the saints. Sounds more like an ancient Roman religion and most of the christian sects arent much better, they deem the Captain Underpants to be singular so as to claim that they are not pagans.
There is 1 GOD not 3!!!

Muslim is not a race, at least not biologically. However with marxist crackas and the allowance of them to make, define or even to redefine social aspects of the society. Being an arab whether biologically or culturally does not automatically make you a muslim, there are christian, jewish and atheist arabs. Regardless of their religion, nation or tribe they belong to. To be a muslim arab in an arab country is no big deal, there is no especial political capital for any political movement in arab countries to make from them. However in the west it is a different story. Muslims may be muslims, but they are also of the particular race they were born and of the particular culture they were raised in. This can be seen in that certain mosques will cater for certain ethnicities, you will find that certain mosques are frequented by say...indonesians, turks, arabs, indians etc. Marxists couldnt pitch at them as a whole or decieve them as a whole because despite being of the same religion, they identified their community by race and culture. Race and culture, the 2 things marxists absolutely despise after religion. They couldnt get any political capital or social impetus while these people subscribed to race, religion and culture, to pitch at one group of muslims would alienate the others due to percieved favouritism.

Another story.....
There was a bosnian muslim i knew who got into a street fight with a leb. He didnt know if the leb was a muslim or not and didnt care for that matter. He didnt like the leb because he was a leb. Soon other lebs joined in against him, he had to take off but he noticed that some of the lebs wore crucifixes and were most likely christian. The issue of religion was irrevelent, the fight was racial.
Ive heard other stories of this nature in the vicinity of mosques, especially in arab ones where black people who decided to turn up for prayer were either chased off or had the poo beaten out of them. All parties were muslim, it was racial.
Much like how you have black, white and hispanic churches.

So what the cracka marxists did was to take the most offensive thing to them namely religion and redefine it. Islam is now defined to mean ethnicity not religion. Using the atheist education system in the west they instilled both the 'race is a social construct' and 'racism is evil' into muslim children, especially in europe. When the marxists say to muslim populations that whites are racist they mean that whites oppose 'social progress' and 'social justice' and that any clash between them and whites is due to political factors.
Biological race has been replaced by political ethnicity, as for culture? Well who can define one form of culture to be higher than another? You have ethnic culture, national culture, corporate culture and then you have numerous sub cultures including that for queers, militant deaf, S&M perverts etc. Yet the mechanism for making all such 'cultures' equal (namely the government) is political. Redefine religion into ideology, once that is done it can only be practiced via the state and in doing so all communities will be bound by political ideology instead of family connections and God would be deemed irrelevent.
And karl marx would be rubbing his dirty little claws together, looking up from hell and laughing with delight.

If you have a problem with someone because of their race, then know why you have that problem. Dont allow the godless to dictate your reason or emotions to suit their political ideology.
Or should I say religious ideology?

No copyright on my writing
http://alturl.com/ccp7n
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #3 - Jun 27th, 2011 at 9:27am
 
leon_the_14,

Thank you for your considered thoughts on the faults, of all those persons who profess a faith in the God of Abraham.





In response...

On your Christian 'acquaintance', who went to assert his own cultural rights, in a halal restaurant.

I ask, was your Christian acquaintance 14 years old ?

That is to say, your description of him did 'paint' him as being juvenile.



On the vices and error of those who refer to themselves as Christians, Jesus had this to say....

Matthew 7:21
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

What is the will of God ???

Jesus said it was this;

Matthew 22:36
Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37  Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38  This is the first and great commandment.
39  And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40  On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

And;

Matthew 7:12
Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.

+++

You told us of the Bosnian moslem who didn't like 'Lebs'.

And stated that the conflict between the Bosnian moslem, and the 'Leb', had a racial component.

Thank you.


But you did not appear to address or acknowledge the cause of the often very open moslem enmity for non-moslems....that moslem enmity [for non-moslems] as sourced from within ISLAM, and that is 'resident' within all moslem communities ???

Why the omission ?

Don't you think that in your discourse, you should address the reasons why, ISLAMIC doctrines compel, and encourage, moslems to always be in conflict with those who are not moslems ???

i.e.
Why did you 'overlook' the actual 'sanctification' of moslem violence against those who are not moslems, as is evident within the Koran, and the Hadith....

Dictionary;
sanctify = =
1 consecrate.
2 make legitimate or binding by religious sanction.
3 free from sin.
4 give the appearance of being right or good.





"....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
Koran 2.98

"....those who reject Allah have no protector."
Koran 47.008
v. 8-11

"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)."
Koran 9.123

"...And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah...Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan:.."
Koran 4.74-76

"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:...."
Koran 9.111

"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
hadithsunnah/bukhari #004.052.196



+++

As for your assertion, of there being only one God, i agree.

But, imo, the God who inspired the Koran, is not THAT God.



To confirm that hypothesis of mine, all you need do, is compare what is stated within the Koran [by the God called Allah],
....and then compare that, with what is stated in the OT Bible, by the God of Abraham.

you can see my exposition on that topic, here....
Jews kill 12 protesters

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1305553526/211#211


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #4 - Jun 27th, 2011 at 10:18am
 
Yadda wrote on Jun 27th, 2011 at 9:27am:
+++

As for your assertion, of there being only one God, i agree.

But, imo, the God who inspired the Koran, is not THAT God.





Actually, it is well known that Mohammed himself acknowledged that SATAN had tricked him,
and Mohammed acknowledged that SATAN gave him verses, which Mohammed included in the Koran.

Google;
muhammad quran satanic verses



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #5 - Jun 27th, 2011 at 1:49pm
 
Quote:
On your Christian 'acquaintance', who went to assert his own cultural rights, in a halal restaurant.

I ask, was your Christian acquaintance 14 years old ?

That is to say, your description of him did 'paint' him as being juvenile.

Nope, but typical of a left winger

Quote:
You told us of the Bosnian moslem who didn't like 'Lebs'.

And stated that the conflict between the Bosnian moslem, and the 'Leb', had a racial component.

Thank you.

I believe all muslim/non muslim conflict is of a racial nature except when it occurs within racial groups. Here it is lebs vs everyone else, within muslim groups it is also racial eg. lebs vs turks

Quote:
As for your assertion, of there being only one God, i agree.

But, imo, the God who inspired the Koran, is not THAT God.

There is only one God, none of the prophets renounced the message of those who came before them.

As for muslim enmity for non muslims...it should be directed at atheists and pagans, add the Jesus is god televangelists as well.

Quote:
Actually, it is well known that Mohammed himself acknowledged that SATAN had tricked him,
and Mohammed acknowledged that SATAN gave him verses, which Mohammed included in the Koran.

Where does Mohammed acknowledge this?
Are you a submitter?
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #6 - Jun 27th, 2011 at 10:03pm
 
Leon what are your thoughts on stoning the cheating child brides to death?

What about the death penalty for apostasy?

What about the destruction of democracy and denial basic freedoms like freedom of speech?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #7 - Jun 28th, 2011 at 2:57am
 
Quote:
Leon what are your thoughts on stoning the cheating child brides to death?

The method of execution is not important.
'Cheating child brides?' Assuming due process such as a fair trial and non bias in laying charges has been done. Then I wouldnt oppose it, if it the standard punishment practiced by that racial group/community then it is not up to me to interfere as I wouldnt want that group to interfere with my community.
If it were in my community then I would want all the facts before saying yes or no to any charges or sentence.

Quote:
What about the death penalty for apostasy?

Provided due process in charge and trial has been done then I wouldnt oppose it. After all, atheists would quite happily kill believers.

Quote:
What about the destruction of democracy and denial basic freedoms like freedom of speech?

Dunno.....ask someone who lived in an eastern bloc country. Or better still ring someone in N.Korea, their first hand experience should be truthful.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #8 - Jun 28th, 2011 at 11:22am
 
leon_the_14 wrote on Jun 28th, 2011 at 2:57am:
Quote:
Leon what are your thoughts on stoning the cheating child brides to death?


The method of execution is not important.
'Cheating child brides?'

Assuming due process such as a fair trial and non bias in laying charges has been done. Then I wouldnt oppose it, if it the standard punishment practiced by that racial group/community then it is not up to me to interfere as I wouldnt want that group to interfere with my community.





leon_the_14,

Therefore, if the law in my community said that i could 'lawfully' take your sister captive, and rape her, and then sell her, that would be OK by you, because you would not wan to interfere with the laws of my community ???

Like all moslems, you are a very tolerant person leon_the_14.
/sarc off




Google,
"they had no right to say no"


Google,
"rape jihad"


Google,
beslan children raped then murdered, jihad


Google,
egypt muslims abduction christian wife daughter, muslim police arrest husband father


Google,
muslims christians persecution forced islamization





Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #9 - Jun 28th, 2011 at 1:29pm
 
Quote:
Therefore, if the law in my community said that i could 'lawfully' take your sister captive, and rape her, and then sell her, that would be OK by you, because you would not wan to interfere with the laws of my community ???

Nope in that situation anything goes, I would look at the racial grouping of your community and retaliate appropriately.

Quote:
Like all moslems, you are a very tolerant person leon_the_14.

Stated before that I'm not a muslim.
Most mosques dont like/welcome whites, again I point out the issue of enmity is racial.

Quote:
Google,
"they had no right to say no"

Google,
"rape jihad"

Google,
beslan children raped then murdered, jihad

Google,
egypt muslims abduction christian wife daughter, muslim police arrest husband father

Google,
muslims christians persecution forced islamization

Ah yes, if you cant explain it in your own words....then google is your friend.

As for Beslan, the Ossetians were targeted because of their race. They are an Aryan people, the chechens, ingushes, arabs and other filth are Turanians.
But they got their shelter space in the country of their Turanian brothers -that being 'christian' Georgia.

Just like Bilal Skaf and his gang and the rapes that still occur to this day, but its not PC to mention them. Are you going to tell me that all the offenders were exclusively muslim? They were both leb christians and muslims, they are racially motivated.
It is lebs (circassian/arab mixes) against whites (mostly aryan).

As for the egyptian problems, that is due mostly to corruption as well as there being a racial element. Copts still retain a Greek/Maltese element to their culture and with some to their immediate ancestry.

Stop trying to blame religion for racial problems that would still occur even if it wasnt there.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #10 - Jun 28th, 2011 at 8:04pm
 
leon_the_14 wrote on Jun 26th, 2011 at 9:24pm:
Lets look at other things islam haters use.....

Islam is an arab religion for arabs only!
Wrong. Only 15% of muslims are arab (by race), you might throw in another 10% for half castes and mongrels as well as those who are arab by culture eg. Berbers, Somalis etc.  


Careful there Leon. Muslims love to play the race card when they are on the defensive. Also the person/thing/deity you call allah is know to us New Age Muslims as halla. In our alleged religion we don't care for the opinions of others.
Back to top
 

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
leon_the_14
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45
atheists.2hell.com
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #11 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 2:46am
 
Quote:
Careful there Leon. Muslims love to play the race card when they are on the defensive. Also the person/thing/deity you call allah is know to us New Age Muslims as halla. In our alleged religion we don't care for the opinions of others.

Since when is 'muslim' a race?
There is no biological basis for that claim, the same way that 'muslims' cannot claim to be discriminated against because of it.
Unless they wish to claim the marxist 'race is a social concept' mantra, in that case they are not muslims but apostates.
Back to top
 

PRAISE JEHOVAH
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #12 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 6:37am
 
Quote:
Since when is 'muslim' a race?


Muslim is not a race, but Muslims are overwhelmingly of racial backgrounds "different" to most Australians, hence the perception of Muslims as a "foreign race".

So in the minds of the ignorant (ie. about 95% of people on this forum), "islamics" is a race. Except when it doesn't suit them, and they want to avoid charges of racism and bigotry, when it all of a sudden becomes just a religion.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21611
A cat with a view
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #13 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 8:33am
 
leon_the_14 wrote on Jun 28th, 2011 at 1:29pm:
Quote:
Therefore, if the law in my community said that i could 'lawfully' take your sister captive, and rape her, and then sell her, that would be OK by you, because you would not wan to interfere with the laws of my community ???

Nope in that situation anything goes, I would look at the racial grouping of your community and retaliate appropriately.

Quote:
Like all moslems, you are a very tolerant person leon_the_14.


Stated before that I'm not a muslim.

Most mosques dont like/welcome whites, again I point out the issue of enmity is racial.


As for Beslan, the Ossetians were targeted because of their race. They are an Aryan people, the chechens, ingushes, arabs and other filth are Turanians.

But they got their shelter space in the country of their Turanian brothers -that being 'christian' Georgia.

Just like Bilal Skaf and his gang and the rapes that still occur to this day, but its not PC to mention them. Are you going to tell me that all the offenders were exclusively muslim? They were both leb christians and muslims, they are racially motivated.

It is lebs (circassian/arab mixes) against whites (mostly aryan).

As for the egyptian problems, that is due mostly to corruption as well as there being a racial element. Copts still retain a Greek/Maltese element to their culture and with some to their immediate ancestry.

Stop trying to blame religion for racial problems that would still occur even if it wasnt there.




So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM, the 'religion', promotes violence towards, and intolerance of, all non-moslems.
[e.g. Koran 2.98  Koran 9.123]

So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM is a vicious political and 'religious' tyranny, which has always encouraged the murder of its critics.
[e.g. Koran 5.33  Koran 33.60,61]

So, it doesn't matter that ISLAM encourages, as a 'virtue', political and 'religious' fascism.
[e.g. Koran 9.29  Koran 3.85]



Because those who oppose ISLAM are NOT motivated by any sense of outrage at the injustices which are being promoted by ISLAM, and its followers.

Those who are critical of, and oppose ISLAM, are motivated by [their] racism, and are clearly racists.
/sarc off



+++


How Taqiyya Alters Islams Rules of War

"....
Hostility Disguised As Grievance
In their statements directed at European or American audiences, Islamists maintain that the terrorism they direct against the West is merely reciprocal treatment for decades of Western and Israeli oppression. Yet in writings directed to their fellow Muslims, this animus is presented, not as a reaction to military or political provocation but as a product of religious obligation."

http://www.meforum.org/2538/taqiyya-islam-rules-of-war


Google;
taqiyya - the muslim doctrine of deceit


Google;
we smile to the face "while our hearts curse them"




+++

THE WORDS OF A MAN WHO UNDERSTANDS WHAT ISLAM IS....


"....Battle, animosity, and hatred -- directed from the Muslim to the infidel -- is the foundation of our religion.."

OBL

ISLAM's way of achieving 'peace' explained - according to Osama Bin Laden...
OR,
Advice to real moslems, on how to be 'rightly guided' in your worldly relationships with infidels.

November 10, 2008
Raymond Ibrahim: "Islam's Doctrines of Deception"

Quote:

"As to the relationship between Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High's Word: ‘We renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us -- till you believe in Allah alone’ [Koran 60:4]. So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from the heart. And this fierce hostility -- that is, battle -- ceases only if the infidel submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed [i.e., a dhimmi], or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable [i.e., taqiyya]. But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy!  Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred -- directed from the Muslim to the infidel -- is the foundation of our religion. And we consider this a justice and kindness to them" (from The Al Qaeda Reader).
.....It bears repeating that this hostile world view is well supported by all of Islam’s schools of jurisprudence."



http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/raymond-ibrahim-islams-doctrines-of-deception....



n.b. the words....

".....But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy!"


Translation....

If the hatred for non-moslems, at any time extinguishes from the heart of a moslem, "this is great apostasy!"

i.e.
You can only be a REAL moslem, if you have a burning HATRED for non-moslems.




THE TRUTH....

Moslems will claim that those who oppose moslem violence [to spread ISLAM], are 'racists'.

Moslems will claim that those who oppose moslem supremacism, are 'racists'.

Because, it is those 'racist' non-moslems who resist the spread of the influence of ISLAM, which cause moslem violence.
  [<---- moslem 'logic' expressed]


Google;
those who oppose islam cause wars


Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2011 at 8:46am by Yadda »  

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Lestat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1403
Re: In defence of Islam
Reply #14 - Jun 29th, 2011 at 10:05am
 
Does anyone actually read Yadda's 'cut and paste' garbage?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print