mozzaok wrote on Jul 6^th, 2011 at 12:13pm:



Can you point out one 'racist' thing, or is this just another example of the auotmaton-like thought processes of the average progressive that sees the word 'aborigine' and immediately assumes theres racism involved?

Actually, don't answer - I already know.

So, I suppose you don’t think with your superior intellect that there “are” NO Aboriginals out there in the community just waiting for the opportunity to sue the Government over “anything” to make their own private lives financially better?  Some of these so-called Aboriginals would be lucky to have teaspoon of pure Aboriginal black blood in their entire bodies.  But I suppose that makes no difference to you or your biased views.

No one is, or has ever suggested to my knowledge that what happened to the Aboriginal people was a good thing, but we are talking about something that happened Centuries ago.

I am not apologising to any Aboriginal people about what happened Centuries ago, because my family didn’t come to Australia until 1870.

So why the hell should families like mine and other who arrived here after 1788 be forced to compensate Aboriginals and to apologise to Aboriginals for what the British did to them?  

My family never stole any of their bloody kids, so why should we say sorry?  Make the Government of the day pay for the compensation, not the tax payers.   Too often, Governments make idiotic decisions that effect people in the negative way and then the tax payers are the ones paying the compensation and left to say sorry for something these idiot scum-bag pollies do in our name. Well I say NO MORE!!

At the time, Cook was a British Officer serving in the British Navy, was he not?

Therefore England is financially & emotionally responsibly for the Aboriginal claims, not Australians.    

The Aboriginal claims should be against England, not Australia, because Australia was not an independent Nation until the 1900 hundreds