Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print
Monckton and Dennis - Dennis squished, next (Read 12794 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Monckton and Dennis - Dennis squished, next
Reply #180 - Jul 27th, 2011 at 12:48pm
 
Flying Binghi wrote on Jul 27th, 2011 at 8:39am:
.



Oh dear, here's dumb ol hill farmer me asking a simple question and perceptions_now seems unable to answer..


repeat -

More info please perceptions_now. Where do we find these claims of "every scientist" at  NOAA, NASA & the CSIRO ?..
Huh



perceptions_now wrote on Jul 26th, 2011 at 10:35pm:
Flying Binghi wrote on Jul 23rd, 2011 at 1:35pm:
.



perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 7:35pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 7:10pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 7:08pm:
Flying Binghi wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 6:27am:
.


Quote:
via perceptions_now:
Like I said, they are 3 respected organisations, they have websites, look it up!

The short version is, "get off you butt & do your own research"!

But, you won't because you are not interested in the truth, like a few others on this website & others.



Well perceptions_now, i caint see just where yer claims are written so yer just better show me.. Smiley

repeat -

More info please perceptions_now   Where do we find these claims of "every scientist" at  NOAA, NASA & the CSIRO ?..  
Huh





.


How you doin, have you figured out how to use the internet yet?

Or is it that you simply have no intention of looking or accepting anything that doesn't fit your fixed opinion, so you would not pay any credence to anything raised by the likes of NOA, NASA & the CSIRO?

I cant seem to find the information either. It must be true because we here it plenty, but just not when we look for it.


Gee, I really feel sorry for you poor OLD buggers, who can't even use the internet.

Let me give you one more small hint.

Try going to Google, then -
1) Put in - the organisation concerned - ie NASA GISS
2) Add + Climate Change

You MAY be surprised at how many options there are and how much information will become available?

Although you, the Flying Bunghi and some others have no intention of reading it, much less comprehending it, because your minds are already fixed AND incorrectly so!



Oh dear, here's dumb ol hill farmer me asking a simple question and perceptions_now seems unable to answer.. Smiley


repeat -

More info please perceptions_now. Where do we find these claims of "every scientist" at  NOAA, NASA & the CSIRO ?..
Huh






.



Repeat -
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 7:35pm:
Gee, I really feel sorry for you poor OLD buggers, who can't even use the internet.

Let me give you one more small hint.

Try going to Google, then -
1) Put in - the organisation concerned - ie NASA GISS
2) Add + Climate Change

You MAY be surprised at how many options there are and how much information will become available?

Although you, the Flying Bunghi and some others have no intention of reading it, much less comprehending it, because your minds are already fixed AND incorrectly so!


Perahps you could stop talkig to yourself & bone up on your internet & comprehension skills?
 




perceptions_now, ah geuss then with yer 'skills' that you could give me a direct link and allso a quote from the link to back up yer claims ?..
Huh

.




You've heard of the "user pays principle", well I prefer the "user learns principle".

Simply put, if YOU DO THE RESEARCH, then YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO ACT, on YOUR FINDINGS!

So, I'm sure you will excuse me, as I have already given you a few pointers in the correct direction, if I leave you to it and in parting, I RECOMMEND YOU TO THE GOYA PRINCIPLE!  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
O)))
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 153
Gender: male
Re: Monckton and Dennis - Dennis squished, next
Reply #181 - Jul 27th, 2011 at 4:34pm
 
That was terrible. Regardless of who won, it was essentially a pointless debate. We need real authorities debating this. Not economists and public speakers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Monckton and Dennis - Dennis squished, next
Reply #182 - Jul 28th, 2011 at 8:48am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2011 at 11:03am:
Why are we even entertaining Lord Monkton......All political parties within Australia agree that global warming is happening and action is required.....The debate is about which policy will be the most effective in changing our economy to low emissions.....Arguing against the scientific consensus supporting climate change is not going to change the facts and provides ignorance not enlightenment.....Unless the Monkton or his supporters can provide peer reviewed research that contradicts the science they have nothing to offer anyone.....If the Monkton has real evidence that global warming is not happening then he needs to provide his research for peer review and allow it to be scrutinized and deal with skepticism like the research he denies....Monkton has only proven he can question science he has not proven he can deal with it in a peer reviewed process.....When Monkton can present his findings for peer review and stand up to scrutiny he can be taken seriously.....Until then NO political parties in this country believe him.....Having an opinion is not a crime.....Pretending that this opinion is anything but a guess is disturbing!!!

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.
Hippocrates (460 BC - 377 BC), Law


Since when did science ever require a consensus?
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
O)))
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 153
Gender: male
Re: Monckton and Dennis - Dennis squished, next
Reply #183 - Aug 2nd, 2011 at 9:37am
 
Seems Monckton was up to his usual tricks...Here is a thorough debunking of all the myths and misconceptions he came out with in this debate. Quite a lot to get through.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/monckton-myth-17-denniss-debate-part1.html

http://www.skepticalscience.com/monckton-myth-17-denniss-debate-part2.html
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print