Australian Politics Forum - observation vs interpretation

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.

observation vs interpretation
Aug 14^th, 2011 at 8:22am

Sir lastnail wrote on Aug 13^th, 2011 at 11:11pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 13^th, 2011 at 11:06pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Aug 13^th, 2011 at 11:01pm:

evolution is an observation of biological processes usually over long periods of time. It is not a man made construct !!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_%28philosophy_of_science%29

In particular .. read this section:

Concepts that are considered constructs .. include .. scientific hypotheses and theories (e.g., evolutionary theory, gravitational theory), as well as classifications (e.g. in biological taxonomy) are also conceptual entities considered to be constructs.

So how does the theory of God factor into that definition ??

The evolutionary process is not man made. The description and naming of it is man made but the process is observable by anything or anyone.

Actually the process, to the extent it goes beyond natural selection, is not observable. Even natural selection is not directly observable. It is an interpretation, not an observation. Being able to distinguish observation and interpretation is key to understanding the philosophy of science.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #1 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 8:32am

freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 8:22am:

Actually the process, to the extent it goes beyond natural selection, is not observable. Even natural selection is not directly observable. It is an interpretation, not an observation. Being able to distinguish observation and interpretation is key to understanding the philosophy of science.

Not observable in Galapagos tortoise, but it IS observable in, for example, fruit fly.

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #2 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:01am OK, explain what you actually observe in fruit fly.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Grey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5341 Gender:	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #3 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:17am freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:01am: OK, explain what you actually observe in fruit fly. Sounds too much like a book Free http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_45
Back to top	"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #4 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:33am You observe traits. You interpret a reason for those traits. You do not observe the reason, yet without the reason there would be no theory of natural selection. People often confuse their interpretation with their actual observations.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #5 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 1:40pm

freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:33am:

You observe traits. You interpret a reason for those traits. You do not observe the reason, yet without the reason there would be no theory of natural selection. People often confuse their interpretation with their actual observations.

You observe the unopenable watch and arrive at a hypothesis as to how it works. Then you test your hypothesis by experiment and draw your conclusions; which are either that your hypothesis has been proved useful to believe, or not. Then you publish your findings which are tested by peers.

You can't see gravity either, but it's still a good scientific theory.

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #6 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 1:53pm So what is observable in a fruit fly?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 21786
A cat with a view

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #7 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 2:41pm

Grey wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 1:40pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:33am:

You observe traits. You interpret a reason for those traits. You do not observe the reason, yet without the reason there would be no theory of natural selection. People often confuse their interpretation with their actual observations.

You observe the unopenable watch and arrive at a hypothesis as to how it works. Then you test your hypothesis by experiment and draw your conclusions; which are either that your hypothesis has been proved useful to believe, or not. Then you publish your findings which are tested by peers.

You can't see gravity either,

but it's still a good scientific theory.

Perhaps this is true, in the very strictest sense, of 'seeing'.

But you can see the effect that gravity has upon objects.

Just drop an egg, from head height, onto your kitchen floor, and you'll understand perfectly, that there is a ['unseen'] force acting upon the egg. Grin

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Yadda Gold Member Offline Posts: 21786 A cat with a view	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #8 - Aug 14^th, 2011 at 2:47pm observation vs interpretation Both of these things are 'going on' in our heads, aren't they ??? Even the observation part, the 'perception', is also going on, inside of our heads. So, what is real ???
Back to top	"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." Luke 16:31 IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #9 - Aug 15^th, 2011 at 2:25pm Strawberry Fields Quote: ....Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see. It's getting hard to be someone but it all works out. It doesn't matter much to me. Let me take you down, 'cause I'm going to Strawberry Fields. Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about. Strawberry Fields forever.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10266
Gender: male

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #10 - Aug 15^th, 2011 at 3:48pm

To observe is also to interpret. Understanding what one is observing takes the forms of thoughts denoted by a semiotic. Observation then takes the form of already denoted "objects" imbued with meaning. So I think there's a doubling occurring here with the observation versus interpretation discussion. In regards to natural selection, a second interpretation is occuring to justify the initial interpreted observation.

Back to top

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III Gold Member Offline Posts: 10266 Gender:	Re: observation vs interpretation Reply #11 - Aug 15^th, 2011 at 3:56pm The observation "the cat is on the mat" denotes an interpretation of objects: "cat" "on" "mat". A second interpretation would ask, why is the cat on the mat? or, how did the cat come to be on the mat? Natural selection would ask, how did the cat on the mat come to be? Why is the cat on the mat fur orange?
Back to top	IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 21786
A cat with a view

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #12 - Aug 17^th, 2011 at 2:04pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 15^th, 2011 at 3:48pm:

To observe is also to interpret. Understanding what one is observing takes the forms of thoughts denoted by a semiotic.

Observation then takes the form of already denoted "objects" imbued with meaning.

So I think there's a doubling occurring here with the observation versus interpretation discussion. In regards to natural selection, a second interpretation is occuring to justify the initial interpreted observation.

We experience this 'life'.

And we try to 'imbue' whatever we experience, and whatever we perceive, with meaning.

Q.
But why so ???

A.
Is it because it gives us comfort to believe that we can see some form of order in our existence ???

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #13 - Aug 18^th, 2011 at 3:09pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 15^th, 2011 at 3:48pm:

To observe is also to interpret. Understanding what one is observing takes the forms of thoughts denoted by a semiotic. Observation then takes the form of already denoted "objects" imbued with meaning. So I think there's a doubling occurring here with the observation versus interpretation discussion. In regards to natural selection, a second interpretation is occuring to justify the initial interpreted observation.

No, there IS a difference between observing and interpreting...

You 'observe' that one erterior wall of a house is painted white......and all you should report is that the house has one white wall

If you report that the house is white, you have made an assumption, based on your own interpretation....i.e houses usually have all exterior walls the same colour...
There is a difference between report only what you observe, and reporting waht you interpret from those observations...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: observation vs interpretation
Reply #14 - Aug 18^th, 2011 at 4:29pm

Grey wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 1:40pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2011 at 9:33am:

You observe traits. You interpret a reason for those traits. You do not observe the reason, yet without the reason there would be no theory of natural selection. People often confuse their interpretation with their actual observations.

You observe the unopenable watch and arrive at a hypothesis as to how it works. Then you test your hypothesis by experiment and draw your conclusions; which are either that your hypothesis has been proved useful to believe, or not. Then you publish your findings which are tested by peers.

You can't see gravity either, but it's still a good scientific theory.

... let's not forget there is more than one theory on gravity though!

You have to dot all your is and cross all your ts when discussing science ya know!!!! Cool

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged