Grey wrote on Aug 15
th, 2011 at 11:55am:
Science says -
"Dinosaurs (from Greek: δεινός terrible or potent, and σαύρα lizard) are a diverse group of animals that were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), "
"Humans (known taxonomically as Homo sapiens,[3][4] Latin for "wise man" or "knowing man")[5] are the only living species in the Homo genus of bipedal primates in Hominidae, the great ape family. Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago, reaching full behavioral modernity around 50,000 years ago."
Creationists say -
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080620161223AAm1e72That yahoo answers lists the creationist answer as the best is a worry. In fact googling [Dinosaur + man] in various combos gives very little in the way of a scientific view.
Is this evidence of regression?
But they did co exist. Only in "The Flintstones" though. Maybe the creationists think that is a documentary cartoon series?
Evidence of regression? Don't know about that but I have to say it seems to be largely confined to the USA. And the more I see of the USA the more I suspect the gene pool is pretty shallow. Lots of inbreeding may be the problem.
You know, I had an argument, discussion? no chance, with A few Creationists on a web site about the whole issue.
When I raised dinosaurs as evidence that the world was more than 6000 years old you would not believe what they wrote back.
Apparently there has been a conspiracy of archeologists for the last 100 years where they have een creating and burying fake dinosaur skeletons all around the world.
I smacked my forehead with my hand and said to myself "Of course. It's so obvious, why didn't I see it?"
Regression? Those people make rocks look intelligent and cheese a genius.