Australian Politics Forum - Improving this board

Grey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5341 Gender:	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #240 - Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 5:06pm Uncle wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 12:23pm: Could well be a slipping of standards we see. Could be people are too sophisticated these days to allow such absurdities.
Back to top	"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb IP Logged

########## Ex Member	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #241 - Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 5:16pm The best way to improve these boards- and ourselves, one would think, would be to NOT talk about politics...
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #242 - Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:27pm

nairbe wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 3:12pm:

overall Longy mostly things are really good. Politicians suck is the wildest board but considering by its nature it is encouraging partisan attitudes things are not so bad. The spamming is the real issue, Matty does not need to start a thousand Oakshot threads particularly when they don't even live in the electorate.
What you propose is censorship, so i cannot agree, i would love to shut some posters up but i am not quick enough nor do i write well enough to do that. I also don't have the time to do the hours of research to shove down someones throat when they are quoting idiots like Jones and Haddley as some kind of authority.
Maybe you want to ban newspaper links on the politics sucks thread as they are meaningless. Poll results, statistical information and quote from reports only, but who cares what bolt thinks really.

Your post is a bit amusing because you seem to think that a well-reasoned argument will get rid of spammers and abusers! how quaint!!

it doesnt work for exactly the same reason cops have guns. not everyone will obey the rules or be coerced to behave by words. Soem have to be threatened and others forcibly removed. Thats what I will do. What I propose is not censorship unless you belive in uncontrolled, unmoderated insanity. the automatic swear word filter is 'censorship'. banning people for vile abuse and defamation is also censorship.

we ALL believe in censorship. we just disagree on whhere the line is drawn.

If you want a debate on what is censorship then start one. just dont start with the lame notion that controlling and limiting the words people are allowed to use in a public forum is censorship. you will need a more articulate argument than that.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95324 Gender:	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #243 - Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:30pm Ban them, Longy!
Back to top	IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #244 - Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 1:13am

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:27pm:

nairbe wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 3:12pm:

overall Longy mostly things are really good. Politicians suck is the wildest board but considering by its nature it is encouraging partisan attitudes things are not so bad. The spamming is the real issue, Matty does not need to start a thousand Oakshot threads particularly when they don't even live in the electorate.
What you propose is censorship, so i cannot agree, i would love to shut some posters up but i am not quick enough nor do i write well enough to do that. I also don't have the time to do the hours of research to shove down someones throat when they are quoting idiots like Jones and Haddley as some kind of authority.
Maybe you want to ban newspaper links on the politics sucks thread as they are meaningless. Poll results, statistical information and quote from reports only, but who cares what bolt thinks really.

Your post is a bit amusing because you seem to think that a well-reasoned argument will get rid of spammers and abusers! how quaint!!

it doesnt work for exactly the same reason cops have guns. not everyone will obey the rules or be coerced to behave by words. Soem have to be threatened and others forcibly removed. Thats what I will do. What I propose is not censorship unless you belive in uncontrolled, unmoderated insanity. the automatic swear word filter is 'censorship'. banning people for vile abuse and defamation is also censorship.

we ALL believe in censorship. we just disagree on whhere the line is drawn.

If you want a debate on what is censorship then start one. just dont start with the lame notion that controlling and limiting the words people are allowed to use in a public forum is censorship. you will need a more articulate argument than that.

Flipping heck, that's pretty tough talk from somebody who gets the vapours over a word. Grin

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #245 - Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 6:54am

Grey wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 1:13am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:27pm:

nairbe wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 3:12pm:

overall Longy mostly things are really good. Politicians suck is the wildest board but considering by its nature it is encouraging partisan attitudes things are not so bad. The spamming is the real issue, Matty does not need to start a thousand Oakshot threads particularly when they don't even live in the electorate.
What you propose is censorship, so i cannot agree, i would love to shut some posters up but i am not quick enough nor do i write well enough to do that. I also don't have the time to do the hours of research to shove down someones throat when they are quoting idiots like Jones and Haddley as some kind of authority.
Maybe you want to ban newspaper links on the politics sucks thread as they are meaningless. Poll results, statistical information and quote from reports only, but who cares what bolt thinks really.

Your post is a bit amusing because you seem to think that a well-reasoned argument will get rid of spammers and abusers! how quaint!!

it doesnt work for exactly the same reason cops have guns. not everyone will obey the rules or be coerced to behave by words. Soem have to be threatened and others forcibly removed. Thats what I will do. What I propose is not censorship unless you belive in uncontrolled, unmoderated insanity. the automatic swear word filter is 'censorship'. banning people for vile abuse and defamation is also censorship.

we ALL believe in censorship. we just disagree on whhere the line is drawn.

If you want a debate on what is censorship then start one. just dont start with the lame notion that controlling and limiting the words people are allowed to use in a public forum is censorship. you will need a more articulate argument than that.

Flipping heck, that's pretty tough talk from somebody who gets the vapours over a word. Grin

'tough talk' that you dont understand either.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Uncle Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 688	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #246 - Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 8:41am "improving the board and ourselves"
Back to top	"Julia Gillard says she is prepared to legislate a carbon price in the next term. "&&&&- The Age 20/8/10&&&&"You are not just thick - you weant to be thick. It makes you feel compssionate."&&&&- Soren IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #247 - Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 2:42pm

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 6:54am:

Grey wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 1:13am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:27pm:

nairbe wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 3:12pm:

overall Longy mostly things are really good. Politicians suck is the wildest board but considering by its nature it is encouraging partisan attitudes things are not so bad. The spamming is the real issue, Matty does not need to start a thousand Oakshot threads particularly when they don't even live in the electorate.
What you propose is censorship, so i cannot agree, i would love to shut some posters up but i am not quick enough nor do i write well enough to do that. I also don't have the time to do the hours of research to shove down someones throat when they are quoting idiots like Jones and Haddley as some kind of authority.
Maybe you want to ban newspaper links on the politics sucks thread as they are meaningless. Poll results, statistical information and quote from reports only, but who cares what bolt thinks really.

Your post is a bit amusing because you seem to think that a well-reasoned argument will get rid of spammers and abusers! how quaint!!

it doesnt work for exactly the same reason cops have guns. not everyone will obey the rules or be coerced to behave by words. Soem have to be threatened and others forcibly removed. Thats what I will do. What I propose is not censorship unless you belive in uncontrolled, unmoderated insanity. the automatic swear word filter is 'censorship'. banning people for vile abuse and defamation is also censorship.

we ALL believe in censorship. we just disagree on whhere the line is drawn.

If you want a debate on what is censorship then start one. just dont start with the lame notion that controlling and limiting the words people are allowed to use in a public forum is censorship. you will need a more articulate argument than that.

Flipping heck, that's pretty tough talk from somebody who gets the vapours over a word. Grin

'tough talk' that you dont understand either.

Oh I understand alright, you use your position as Mod to take words out of my vocabulary.

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #248 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 11:02am

Grey wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 2:42pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 6:54am:

Grey wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2011 at 1:13am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 10:27pm:

nairbe wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2011 at 3:12pm:

overall Longy mostly things are really good. Politicians suck is the wildest board but considering by its nature it is encouraging partisan attitudes things are not so bad. The spamming is the real issue, Matty does not need to start a thousand Oakshot threads particularly when they don't even live in the electorate.
What you propose is censorship, so i cannot agree, i would love to shut some posters up but i am not quick enough nor do i write well enough to do that. I also don't have the time to do the hours of research to shove down someones throat when they are quoting idiots like Jones and Haddley as some kind of authority.
Maybe you want to ban newspaper links on the politics sucks thread as they are meaningless. Poll results, statistical information and quote from reports only, but who cares what bolt thinks really.

Your post is a bit amusing because you seem to think that a well-reasoned argument will get rid of spammers and abusers! how quaint!!

it doesnt work for exactly the same reason cops have guns. not everyone will obey the rules or be coerced to behave by words. Soem have to be threatened and others forcibly removed. Thats what I will do. What I propose is not censorship unless you belive in uncontrolled, unmoderated insanity. the automatic swear word filter is 'censorship'. banning people for vile abuse and defamation is also censorship.

we ALL believe in censorship. we just disagree on whhere the line is drawn.

If you want a debate on what is censorship then start one. just dont start with the lame notion that controlling and limiting the words people are allowed to use in a public forum is censorship. you will need a more articulate argument than that.

Flipping heck, that's pretty tough talk from somebody who gets the vapours over a word. Grin

'tough talk' that you dont understand either.

Oh I understand alright, you use your position as Mod to take words out of my vocabulary.

if you dont understand the notion of boundaries then that isnt my problem.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

darkhall67 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1935	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #249 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 1:41pm It's political correctness GONE MAD!!!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

########## Ex Member	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #250 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 2:01pm Seeing as 'we are all friends' and as in a way to' Improve these boards' and 'one's self ' - I give all a mug (to have hot cocoa in) as an early xmas present, for xmas.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Improving this board - and ourselves
Reply #251 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 3:13pm

Quote:

Seeing as 'we are all friends' and as in a way to' Improve these boards' and 'one's self ' - I give all a mug (to have hot cocoa in) as an early xmas present, for xmas. Kiss

http://images9.cpcache.com/product/568490219v19_350x350_Front.jpg

thats pretty funny. now if they make a Gillard open I will buy it for all my friends - one of whom still intends to vote labor.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

########## Ex Member	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #252 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 5:06pm One especially for you , http://i1.cpcache.com/product/8820850/novelty_cartoon_feature_mug.jpgside=Back AND one as you ordered for 'all your friends' longie; http://i1.cpcache.com/product/581392000/the_gillards_mug.jpgside=Back
Back to top	« Last Edit: Oct 24^th, 2011 at 5:19pm by N/A » IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #253 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 5:18pm I feel like a mug of cocoa
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged

########## Ex Member	Re: Improving this board - and ourselves Reply #254 - Oct 24^th, 2011 at 5:22pm adelcrow wrote on Oct 24^th, 2011 at 5:18pm: I feel like a mug of cocoa sorry adel only this one left http://i1.cpcache.com/product/452361080/mug.jpgside=Back
Back to top	IP Logged