Australian Politics Forum - 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #75 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm: Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons. To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice'' Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white. WOW
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

GoddyofOz Gold Member Offline Vote 1 for Sex, cause you're gay if you don't Posts: 2397	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #76 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:16pm Free Speech is not a get out of Jail free card for Racism. Feel free to say what you like, but don't get sh!tty when you get scrutinized for your comments.
Back to top	"A Conservative is a man who just sits and thinks, mostly just sits." - Woodrow Wilson. True Patriotism is serving your country all the time, and serving your Politicians when they deserve it. IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #77 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:17pm if only it were, uh .. "scrutinisation" that people were complaining about
Back to top	IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #78 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:19pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm: Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm: Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons. To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice'' Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white. WOW Who said they were dumbo?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #79 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:22pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm: Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm: Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons. To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice'' Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white. WOW What? ARe you saying you are pro-white??
Back to top	IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #80 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:22pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

What? ARe you saying you are pro-white??

I am pro-human. Full stop.

Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #81 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm

... wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

Who said they were dumbo?

your dumbo mate.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #82 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:26pm

GoddyofOz wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:16pm:

Free Speech is not a get out of Jail free card for Racism. Feel free to say what you like, but don't get sh!tty when you get scrutinized for your comments.

his claim was that these people were claiming to be aboriginal while being as white as a scandinavian. with the exampls he used, his point was in fact proven. it is a sad day when being CORRECT is still wrong.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #83 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:27pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:22pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

What? ARe you saying you are pro-white??

I am pro-human. Full stop.

Grin

that sounds like a greens-lose statement. I hope you arent as idiotic as he is.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Gimme Gimme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 765
Gender: female

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #84 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:29pm

There's not much out there on MSM of course because this will be covered up as much as possible by the lame stream media..I wonder if Dutchy Andrew will be having his Dutch hate speech friend Geert Wilders to dinner at his house? Let's keep this thread going..Call it Bolt Watch. Wink

Justice Mordy Bromberg found Bolt and the Herald and Weekly Times contravened the Racial Discrimination Act by publishing two articles on racial identity which contained "errors in fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language".
Justice Bromberg said it was important to note his judgment did not forbid debate or articles on racial identity issues if done "reasonably and in good faith in the making or publishing of a fair comment".
"Nothing in the orders I make should suggest that it is unlawful for a publication to deal with racial identification, including by challenging the genuineness of the identification of a group of people," Justice Bromberg said.
Ms Eatock and a group of eight other Aboriginals took Bolt and the Herald and Weekly Times to court claiming racial vilifiication over two articles in which he criticised fair-skinned Aborigines for what he argued was a choice they made, as people of mixed racial background, to emphasise their indigenous heritage over their white heritage.
In the articles, on April 15 and August 21, 2009, Bolt wrote that some fair-skinned Aboriginal people, whom he called "political Aborigines'', had received prominence or indigenous awards because they chose to identify with their Aboriginality.
The Eatock action claimed Bolt's articles - which appeared under the headlines "It's so hip to be black'' and "White fellas in the black'' - had "offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated'' them and were a breach of racial vilification laws.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/andrew-bolt-racial-vilification-court-case/story-e6frfku0-1226149011720#ixzz1ZDKUoxeb

Back to top

'If everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then there'd be peace.' &&John Lennon

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #85 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:29pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:22pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

What? ARe you saying you are pro-white??

I am pro-human. Full stop.

Grin

SO you can't tell the difference between different people?

Back to top

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #86 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:30pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:22pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

What? ARe you saying you are pro-white??

I am pro-human. Full stop.

Grin

So is andrew bolt:

Quote:

In fact, let’s go beyond racial pride. Beyond black and white. Let’s be proud only of being human beings set on this land together, determined to find what unites us and not to invent such racist and trivial excuses to divide. Deal?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty Reply #87 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:31pm Gimme Gimme wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:29pm: The Eatock action claimed Bolt's articles - which appeared under the headlines "It's so hip to be black'' and "White fellas in the black'' - had "offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated'' them and were a breach of racial vilification laws.
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #88 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:31pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:23pm:

... wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

Because they are preening, Emotionallly Correct morons.
To twig onto this stupid nonsense is 'not noice''

Yep. All the anti-racists are anti-white.

Grin

WOW

Who said they were dumbo?

your dumbo mate.

oooooh incisive.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

darkhall67

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1935

Re: 'Hard Right' Bolt Is Guilty
Reply #89 - Sep 28^th, 2011 at 1:32pm

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:46pm:

toots wrote on Sep 28^th, 2011 at 12:43pm:

It's a disgraceful verdict, he was making the point that there are a few Aboriginal people who look totally white who insist they are black - so what's wrong with that? He made the mistake of thinking he lives in a free country where we can say what we feel but obviously this is now not the case. These few fools have legally reinforced what we already know - that Aboriginal people are protected and no adverse comments about them will be tolerated. Unfortunately, this will not help their cause. A very bad day for Australia.

it does seem a little unfair. what he said wasnt fundamentally inaccurate and reflects a common complaint that a number of 'aboriginals' in fact really arent at all but again only of aboriginal descent - a huge difference.

"And it wasn’t just racial hatred at stake — Bolt was also a sloppy journalist, Bromberg said, that had cynically penned the pieces in a bald-faced attempt to be “destructive of racial tolerance”. The provocative “manner” in which Bolt bent his keyboard was crucial.

“The reasons for that conclusion have to do with the manner in which the articles were written, including that they contained errors of fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language,” he said."

http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/28/bolt-decision-guilty-of-discrimination-judge...

Back to top

IP Logged