Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Australian Hypocrisy (Read 13805 times)
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #210 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 6:39am
 
The wrist x-ray debate
The accuracy of determining age by using wrist or dental x-rays has been questioned by many experts in the field. In August 2011 several medical professional organisations, including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, wrote to the federal government expressing concerns on the use of bone x-rays for age assessments. A follow-up article in the October issue of Australian Doctor argued that the ‘unethical use’ of ‘very inaccurate’ wrist or dental x-rays to determine age should cease, pointing out that the practice is unlawful in the United Kingdom.

Britain’s Children's Commissioner, Sir Al Aynsley-Green, has strongly criticised Australia's use of wrist x-rays to determine the ages of children, stating that the federal police's use of them to assess the ages of Indonesian crew members of asylum seeker boats was ‘unethical’ and ‘inaccurate’.

The Victorian and Queensland child commissioners agree, stating that this method is a ‘bizarre’ way to find out the ages of vulnerable children. They have called for the appointment of a national child commissioner to help protect the rights of any children possibly facing lengthy sentences in adult jails.

http://parliamentflagpost.blogspot.com/2011/11/determining-ages-of-people-smuggl...
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #211 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 7:01pm
 
Quote:
Well, firstly they're already using minors.


Because firstly, we are soft on minors. I suspect this has not quite sunk in yet Helian, even though I brought it up many times. Children do not make good pirates. They do make half decent basket weavers, but manning a ship on open waters takes a bit more. It is our laws that are the cause of children being put on these perilous journeys.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #212 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 7:17pm
 
Quote:
Children do not make good pirates.


Why not?
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #213 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 7:50pm
 
They are weak and inexperienced. 50 people died off Christmas island last year. That can't be good for business. It's not the sort of thing you want to have children running.

Unless of course children get let off scott free, whereas adults get guaranteed jail time.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #214 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 8:10pm
 
Quote:
Only recently, The Indian Navy managed to capture pirates who were terrorizing the seas and found that of the 61 person nabbed, 25 were children and that too below 15 years of age. An official commented on this alarming trend and said, “At least four of them are just 11 or so. It seems younger and younger children in Somalia are being pushed into piracy, which is proving immensely lucrative in the lawless country...the established pirates, who have got rich, are no longer sailing out on raids."




http://news.oneindia.in/2011/03/17/child-soldiers-below-15-turn-pirates-in-somal...

Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #215 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 8:59pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 22nd, 2011 at 6:21am:
jame-e wrote on Nov 21st, 2011 at 11:29pm:
Yes, Australian citizens and foreign criminals are separate issues, justice is but one. I'm trying to ask you to justify your justice.

As I said... You're trying to conflate separate issues, now you're trying to obfuscate the point.

If you want to start a thread about another instance of injustice (or, say, the "justice of justice" or the "meaning of meaning") then do it.

jame-e wrote on Nov 21st, 2011 at 11:29pm:
So you can't see the possibility for children to be used more?

I'm gobsmacked.

I would rather pay due compensation than spend the money and resources on increasing the rate of child abuse.

Well, firstly they're already using minors.

Secondly, to say that Australia must be more vigilant and use creditable methods for confirming the age of a claimant's assertion of minority is not to say that Indonesia bears no responsibility for ensuring that its citizens (particularly its minors) are not exploited by organised crime gangs (which is who is really responsible for people smuggling) by having their authorities protect them through vigilant local policing (particularly on Rote Island).

However, as I've said previously, we should hold ourselves accountable only to the standards we have set for ourselves and those we'd will for all others...

The level of others' standards (for better or worse) is no excuse for failing our own.


I'm not trying to obfuscate friend, i know when i am, i always end up sticky.

What i would desire is for you to conflate the two: Your one eye with the rest of reality.

Your selfishness is mirrored by the people who send these kids. weird.

The level of others' standards (for better or worse) is no excuse for failing our own.

My (et al) point exactly.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #216 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:42am
 
freediver wrote on Nov 22nd, 2011 at 7:01pm:
Quote:
Well, firstly they're already using minors.


Because firstly, we are soft on minors. I suspect this has not quite sunk in yet Helian, even though I brought it up many times.

Well, that is another debate altogether (and another attempt by you to deflect).

Even if Indonesian minors were to be detained/incarcerated as minors in Australia following convictions for people smuggling, it is the responsibility of Australian authorities to use creditable means to confirm their claims of minority and then to deal with appropriately as minors.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #217 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:47am
 
jame-e wrote on Nov 22nd, 2011 at 8:59pm:
I'm not trying to obfuscate friend, i know when i am, i always end up sticky.

What i would desire is for you to conflate the two: Your one eye with the rest of reality.

Your selfishness is mirrored by the people who send these kids. weird.

Not sure what that's all about  Roll Eyes

jame-e wrote on Nov 22nd, 2011 at 8:59pm:
The level of others' standards (for better or worse) is no excuse for failing our own.

My (et al) point exactly.

Good. Then we're agreed that using discredited means to determine age, which inflicts a gross injustice on minors, is an example of where we have failed our own standards.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #218 - Nov 23rd, 2011 at 8:30pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:47am:
jame-e wrote on Nov 22nd, 2011 at 8:59pm:
I'm not trying to obfuscate friend, i know when i am, i always end up sticky.

What i would desire is for you to conflate the two: Your one eye with the rest of reality.

Your selfishness is mirrored by the people who send these kids. weird.

Not sure what that's all about  Roll Eyes


Yes, i know, it's a problem i have noticed.  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #219 - Nov 24th, 2011 at 6:06am
 
THE Australian Human Rights Commission will probe the treatment of Indonesian 'fisherboys' amid concerns over a controversial X-ray technique used to assess their age.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/human-rights-probe-on-wrist-x-r...
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #220 - Nov 24th, 2011 at 11:01pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 24th, 2011 at 6:06am:
THE Australian Human Rights Commission will probe the treatment of Indonesian 'fisherboys' amid concerns over a controversial X-ray technique used to assess their age.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/human-rights-probe-on-wrist-x-r...


"Laubman and Pank will probe the consistent inability of Australian "fisherboys" to see! Amid concerns of "oneyeism" and a total lack of reason behind their arguments"

This is easy  Smiley
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #221 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 9:03am
 
Quote:
The president of the Australian Human Rights Commission, Catherine Branson QC recently announced an inquiry into the treatment of suspected people smugglers who say that they are children.


Another minor goes free after smuggling case charge is dropped
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #222 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 9:15am
 
Sarah Westwood is doing a great job.


Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
Dooley
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 345
Re: Australian Hypocrisy
Reply #223 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 10:01am
 
For a start, the treatment of minors here in our jails and how we percieve the treatment I feel is in no way a reflection of how a adventerous indonseian kid might see a excursion in what their fathers claim is their own waterworld backyard. In fact while many of us are more intent on removing blackheads and choosing what color undies we might like to wear under our skirt/shorts today when we were 12 years old - like my father (yes not that long ago comparativley speaking) they leave school at anywhere from 10 upwards to work for their family business. What ever tha business might be. And if we are willing to venture back in history all the way to 80 years ago (so so long ago, HAHA ) I will point out to you an example of a dear departed friend of mine who was the bastard son of Sir John Hargraves. He was sent out as a 12 year old, by himself on horseback to tension and rewire over 120 miles of fencing. No mean feat for a 12 year. He was thirteen by the time he got back............ It is not unusual for youngsters in tribal or village communities to be expected to undertake simple tasks that may be arduous, but not hard or complex in their nature to complete. It is no small feat to realise it is prolly those same kids who piloted the boat as well as plot the course for the journey that now declare they are only cooks. As far as why the "child" might be told to complete the task set out for him? There is prolly a range of reasons a couple that we wouldn't and indeed culturally couldn't neccessarily fathom as an advantage in the development of a maturing illiterate young man. For example

1) A prisoner in an Australian jail has made available educational resources that a poor fishing family father could never possibly afford to purchase for the son. Therefore it is "worth it" to see his son educated and he is financially compensated for the loss of his son while he is away at "school".

2) In times of hardship due to unseasonal weather, natural catastrophe, poltical upheaval etc it might be an advantage to "foster" one or a number of your children off to OZ educational facilities at no cost to the family. In fact by the time  they have finished the sentence they end up earning a tidy sum  to take home with them.

3) The bastard son needs to find his own way and this is the only way to be rid of the kid for a while by selling him of to slave traders.

And make no mistake these people are slaves that are traded - ask any of the newly arrived how they get on in general if they make it to mainland Oz without the authorities picking them up and they will tell you everyone along the line abuses them and treats them as slaves.

In my own opinion the Fed Gov should make the crime of bringing these refo's here in this manner a crime against humanity and declare them as dangerous criminals, pass laws where execution by stoning is the maximum penalty life sentence the minimum, and then sit back and watch how many people smugglers are willing to risk their own lives as well as the lives of the refo's....................

Either way it will settle to a trickle within a week.

The point I'm trying to make here is that our white bread mentaity just doesn't comprehend their sago and tempeh vibe. And just so a few of the unknowing amongst us have a slightly better apreiciation of how divergent our thought processesare to our northern nieghbours, once you observe the maps they display on school walls and in text books where the northern half of Oz is coloured in the same colour as Indonesia the picture becomes a little clearer about how the establishment in Indonesia percieves the northern half of mainland Oz.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print