longweekend58 wrote on Nov 3
rd, 2011 at 9:37pm:
Equitist wrote on Nov 3
rd, 2011 at 8:44pm:
Sounds preposterous, doesn't it - and yet most of us seem willing to tolerate this same type of situation in our day to day lives - at work, in the community and in the world!?
Here's a scenario I would ask everyone to consider...
If you held a birthday party for your 7 year old son or daughter and invited 19 guests: would you allow your child to take 19 out of 20 equal-sized pieces of that cake for themselves, thereby leaving a final 1/20th for the remaining 19 children to share!?
I would hope that you would denounce such a scenario as totally unfair and unreasonable - not to mention that it would be teaching the child selfish and anti-social attitudes.
So, I now ask you to answer this question honestly: at what age would you start teaching that same child that it is OK for the top 5% of individuals to control hoard 95% of the nation's (or world's) resources!?
I am especially keen to hear from the Xtians amongst us!
PS This thread was prompted by a thread discussing the Occupy 99% Protests elsewhere:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1317806183/180#184 your scenario is stupid because you arent really talking about equality at all - only equality of reward, not equality of effort or equality of sacrifice. And all the time you crap on about this, the people with the 19/20 of the cake that you contribute nothing towards happily give large amounts back to you for no reward only to have you spit in their face for the gesture. You constantly complain about everyone elses share and never ask the real question.
HOW BIG IS THE CAKE? yes its a question no one ever asks.
Let me help. Because of the efforts of relatively few, the size of the 'cake' is around 100 times what it was a mere 50 years ago. And you get a larger proportion now than you used to as well. So not only do you get a larger PORTION of the cake the amount you get is vastly more than it used to.
The only difference is that people didnt used to complain about it. Now they do. They want more... for less effort.
You are just greedy.
You state, that because of the efforts of the relatively few, the cake is now much bigger.
It is more like the efforts of the many, but most of the cake is taken by the relatively few.
Can 5% who hold most of the wealth produce a large cake? I doubt it.
The only way the 5% could grab such a big slice of the cake is, by getting between the producer of the cake and the consumer of the cake, and in the end, the few keep most of the cake.
As written in the book "Animal Farm, the hardest working horse, does not get get the most hay, and in the end it finishes in knackery; that is fairnes and equality for you.