Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11
Send Topic Print
Gays and marriage (Read 6935 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #45 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #46 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:00pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.  



I'll get used to it IF it changes.  Don't count your chickens before they've hatched.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #47 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:04pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.  



I'll get used to it IF it changes.  Don't count your chickens before they've hatched.


Like any progressive society, Australia will see a change soon.  Better start getting used to it because I know that with your kind of bigoted beliefs it will be very hard to adjust.  And what, with everyone turning gay because of it and females unable to find husbands, oh no!!
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #48 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:07pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:04pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.  



I'll get used to it IF it changes.  Don't count your chickens before they've hatched.


Like any progressive society, Australia will see a change soon.  Better start getting used to it because I know that with your kind of bigoted beliefs it will be very hard to adjust.  And what, with everyone turning gay because of it and females unable to find husbands, oh no!!


What's to get used to?  IF the law changes, I'll treat gay couples just the same as I do now - by completely ignoring them.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #49 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:12pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:07pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:04pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.  



I'll get used to it IF it changes.  Don't count your chickens before they've hatched.


Like any progressive society, Australia will see a change soon.  Better start getting used to it because I know that with your kind of bigoted beliefs it will be very hard to adjust.  And what, with everyone turning gay because of it and females unable to find husbands, oh no!!


What's to get used to?  IF the law changes, I'll treat gay couples just the same as I do now - by completely ignoring them.


But when the law changes, apparently all the men will turn gay. Are you going to ignore all men?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #50 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:15pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:12pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:07pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:04pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:54pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


I don't think they are seeking you to agree.  Gay people just wish to have the same rights as heterosexuals and to be left alone to go about their normal daily lives without discrimination by our own government and laws.



You are confsuing "rights" with "privileges".  There is no right to get married, it is a privilege, reserved for those who meet the criteria.  


And just like once the No Johnny's club didn't accept Johnnys, criteria changes.  Get used to it.  



I'll get used to it IF it changes.  Don't count your chickens before they've hatched.


Like any progressive society, Australia will see a change soon.  Better start getting used to it because I know that with your kind of bigoted beliefs it will be very hard to adjust.  And what, with everyone turning gay because of it and females unable to find husbands, oh no!!


What's to get used to?  IF the law changes, I'll treat gay couples just the same as I do now - by completely ignoring them.


But when the law changes, apparently all the men will turn gay. Are you going to ignore all men?


A stupid argument, even by your rock-botom standards alevine.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #51 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:27pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:15pm:
A stupid argument, even by your rock-botom standards alevine.


It's not my argument, it's the argument of those you agree with.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #52 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:33pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:27pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:15pm:
A stupid argument, even by your rock-botom standards alevine.


It's not my argument, it's the argument of those you agree with.



No, it's a false argument, propagated as an attempt to discredit those opposed.  Much like no anti-DLS exponent has ever said 'It'll fade the curtains' as a reason why they're opposed to it, yet it gets trotted out time and again as though it was the basis for all opposition.

Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #53 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:38pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:33pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:27pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:15pm:
A stupid argument, even by your rock-botom standards alevine.


It's not my argument, it's the argument of those you agree with.



No, it's a false argument, propagated as an attempt to discredit those opposed.  Much like no anti-DLS exponent has ever said 'It'll fade the curtains' as a reason why they're opposed to it, yet it gets trotted out time and again as though it was the basis for all opposition.

 


Anger over rally to ridicule gay marriage
August 16, 2011
Ads by Google


Independent MP Bob Katter auctioned his hat at the "Don't meddle with marriage" rally at Parliament House in Canberra for $2700. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
Marriage equality advocates have condemned comments that same-sex marriage would allow unions between pedophiles and children made at a rally in Canberra.

They say organisers of the pro-marriage rally where conservative American commentator Rebecca Hagelin made the statement should distance themselves from her remarks.

The rally today, organised by the Australian Christian Lobby and the Australian Family Association, heard from a handful of federal MPs including Queensland independent Bob Katter.

Mr Katter told the gathering of several hundred people the proposition should not be treated seriously.

"Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed," he said to cheers and thunderous applause.

Australian Marriage Equality spokesman Rodney Croome said offensive rhetoric like that of Mr Katter and Ms Hagelin had no place in debate on same-sex marriage.

"The Australian Christian Lobby, which often complains about opponents of same-sex marriage being ridiculed and demonised, must show it is sincere about a mature debate by distancing itself from the offensive comments made today", he said.

A Queensland psychologist who specialises in the mental health of gays and lesbians said comments made at the rally were "damaging".

"Prejudice and ridicule damage the mental health of young same-sex attracted people and the last thing they need to hear are these kinds of offensive comments from people who purport to represent 'family values'," Paul Martin said.

Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce told the rally his four daughters would be affected if same-sex marriage was allowed.

"We know that the best protection for those girls is that they get themselves into a secure relationship with a loving husband, and I want that to happen for them.


"I don't want any legislator to take that right away from me."

But Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, whose bill to allow same-sex marriage is before the Senate, said the senator had misunderstood.

"There is nothing in my Marriage Equality Bill that would prevent Senator Joyce's daughters from getting married to the partner of their choice," Senator Hanson-Young said.

"Rather than taking rights away, the bill extends the rights to all couples."



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/anger-over-rally-to-ridicule-gay-marriage-20110816-1iw1e.html#ixzz1deRYGooU

Hmmm...I think you're wrong ONCE again Wes.  You must be getting pretty tired of always being wrong?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #54 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:41pm
 
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:33pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:27pm:
... wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 2:15pm:
A stupid argument, even by your rock-botom standards alevine.


It's not my argument, it's the argument of those you agree with.



No, it's a false argument, propagated as an attempt to discredit those opposed.  Much like no anti-DLS exponent has ever said 'It'll fade the curtains' as a reason why they're opposed to it, yet it gets trotted out time and again as though it was the basis for all opposition.

 

You need to get out from under that rock you live under,Wes, I've heard that silly old bitch that runs the NSW anti DLS campaign actually use the fade the curtains excuse ,that's why most people think morons like that are in fact ,morons.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #55 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:00pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:53pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:32pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:30pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:22pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:16pm:
olde.sault wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 5:52am:
The IrRev. Bill Cruise had a fight on his hands last night on 2GB, he, all for gay being permitted to marry and most callers totally against this.

The objectors couldn't satisfactorily explain why they were anti so I'll do that for them.

As gays destroyed the word "gay" (no synonym quite covers its one-time meaning) so they'll trash the real meaning of "marriage".

No reason why they shouldn't be given rights to some ceremony but it'll have to have a different name.


Exactly right. Gay marriage is an abomnation unto the Lord, and makes a mockey of values, decency and overall mankind.


Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?


Okay, I made one small typo, but you repeatedly fail to spell his name correctly. Why is that?


Stop answering questions with questions.

You had a complete thread about a grammatical error and yet you seem to not care about your own errors.  

Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?  Yes or no, and explain.


There's a difference between a typo and a speaking error. I will answer your question, as long as you first tell me why you cannot spell his name correctly.


Just answer the question and stop avoiding.  Especially if you wish to be taken seriously and not as a 12 year old who argues with parents and creates ultimatums to avoid eating your peas.  Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?  YES or NO and EXPLAIN.

Smiley Thanks.


Okay, to answer your question, no.

Now, could you kindly return the favour and answer my question?
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #56 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:05pm
 
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:53pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:32pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:30pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:22pm:
matty wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 12:16pm:
olde.sault wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 5:52am:
The IrRev. Bill Cruise had a fight on his hands last night on 2GB, he, all for gay being permitted to marry and most callers totally against this.

The objectors couldn't satisfactorily explain why they were anti so I'll do that for them.

As gays destroyed the word "gay" (no synonym quite covers its one-time meaning) so they'll trash the real meaning of "marriage".

No reason why they shouldn't be given rights to some ceremony but it'll have to have a different name.


Exactly right. Gay marriage is an abomnation unto the Lord, and makes a mockey of values, decency and overall mankind.


Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?


Okay, I made one small typo, but you repeatedly fail to spell his name correctly. Why is that?


Stop answering questions with questions.

You had a complete thread about a grammatical error and yet you seem to not care about your own errors.  

Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?  Yes or no, and explain.


There's a difference between a typo and a speaking error. I will answer your question, as long as you first tell me why you cannot spell his name correctly.


Just answer the question and stop avoiding.  Especially if you wish to be taken seriously and not as a 12 year old who argues with parents and creates ultimatums to avoid eating your peas.  Are you saying that Allen, your hero, is an abomination?  YES or NO and EXPLAIN.

Smiley Thanks.


Okay, to answer your question, no.

Now, could you kindly return the favour and answer my question?


What part of YES or NO and EXPLAIN did you not understand?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #57 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:09pm
 
Quote:
Hmmm...I think you're wrong ONCE again Wes.  You must be getting pretty tired of always being wrong?


What you think, and reality are poles apart.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
olde.sault
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2913
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #58 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:19pm
 
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


Indeed, very risky!

At least, one can get cyctitis, that usually needs antibiotic to cure, at most, AIDS.

Hardly a practice that can be sprinkled with Holy Water!

That is why such a relationship needs a different tag to a marriage between heterosexuals - I don't mean stunt- weddings between celebrities but that of a sincere couple planning to raise a family.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Gays and marriage
Reply #59 - Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:27pm
 
olde.sault wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:19pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 1:21pm:
Let them get married, who cares.

Just don’t expect/force everyone to agree with you that sticking your willy up some other blokes dirty blurter is a good thing.... Undecided


Indeed, very risky!

At least, one can get cyctitis, that usually needs antibiotic to cure, at most, AIDS.

Hardly a practice that can be sprinkled with Holy Water!

That is why such a relationship needs a different tag to a marriage between heterosexuals - I don't mean stunt- weddings between celebrities but that of a sincere couple planning to raise a family.





What business is it of yours if a couple of gay people want to marry? mind your own bloody business, its interfering, clueless, bigoted fools  that cause all the problems in society today.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 14th, 2011 at 3:42pm by skippy. »  

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11
Send Topic Print