Lisa you are the biggest whinger on this board and the one who bothers the moderators & FD more than anyone else.

A few people have suggested now that you leave if you don't like it here - rather than disrupt this board with your constant complaints and abuse. I think it would be best if you did leave. You are obviously very unhappy here, not only with FD's administration, but you don't like many of the members either.

This forum isn't just about catering to your demands. Most of the members here make an effort to get along and compromise - but not you.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 19^th, 2011 at 6:06pm:


FD??? Care to read back over the past few pages of this topic alone? You will see exactly how and why ignoring disturbed and bored stalkers doesn't work at all.

If anything .. it only makes them worse!

Oh and I found this interesting (as well as relevant) to the last 2 pages of this topic FD.

Forum Rules

Personal criticism

Do not post personal criticism of other members. Do not respond to personal criticism of yourself or other members. This is the biggest problem on OzPolitic. Too many members are easily baited into off-topic personal exchanges. If you participate in any kind of flame war you will be suspended, regardless of who started it or who you think ‘deserved it’

.

I trust that these rules .. YOUR rules will be upheld.

cods wrote on Nov 19^th, 2011 at 4:04pm:


There you go Cods, you can see very well that things aren't working. This is the premise that Michael Crichton wrote about in Jurassic Park. The more you try to control complex systems, the more chaos you create, (chaos theory). Now some things are best handled at a Federal level. And so some form of centralised administration is necessary. But most things are better handled locally.

Let's take child welfare for instance. Why do we send money to the federal government who decide how much will be spent on the welfare of children. Then hand that over to a bureacracy who use the money to shore up their own empire, run advertising camapaigns, monumental leaflet drops to explain the latest buzz phrase in child welfare. And finally dribble down what's left to the the local community?  Our town is going to be a city in the new year yet there is no child welfare office. It's all handled from Bunbury the next city up the coast.

And on a local level people don't talk about child welfare. Its the responsibility of 'government'. Older heads like yours that might know a thing or two are out of the loop. When men get drunk and bash their wives and children other men don't (as a general rule) do anything. To do so would in all probability get them in trouble with the police.

This is all an unnatural and inefficient way to live. Anarchism is simply about decentralisation of power and making collaborating individuals more important than totalitarian governments. And it always was. Cods.

Anarchists were opposed to Bolshevists. They didn't believe in revolutions and forcing people against their will to adopt to centralised power. Just take the time to read this short letter to Karl Marx from Joseph Proudhon, the first person to call himself an Anarchist.

http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/proudhon/letters/proudhontomarx.ht...

Or you might prefer the AnarchoConservative P.J. O'Rourke

cods wrote on Nov 19^th, 2011 at 7:51pm:


I think it would be a lost cause trying to make peace with Lisa. Perhaps if she laid off the name calling it might help. I find it very offensive to be called a multi troll/flamer/clone, Mad Mantra etc. continually. I understand these references are often made because of the restrictions of her limited vocabulary but that's no excuse.

Sorry Cods but I've seen her put down to many people in the past year. If she's not correcting their punctuation, grammar or demeaning them - she's name calling. She can't even stop at that and has to copy the same highlighted post over and over again ad nauseum - then bump it another dozen times for good measure.

I'll just collect her abusive posts from now on and send them with links to all the mods. Perhaps someone will have the guts to stand up to her.

Don't like the quote function     but this is too pppppprecious.!!!!!!!!
I have edited some of it purely by chance
ie names are gone.

Much prefer to cut and paste myself  But  this is  


]Lisa you are the biggest whinger on this board and the one who bothers the moderators & FD more than anyone else.

A few people have suggested now that you leave if you don't like it here - rather than disrupt this board with your constant complaints and abuse. I think it would be best if you did leave. You are obviously very unhappy here, not only with FD's administration, but you don't like many of the members either.

This forum isn't just about catering to your demands. Most of the members here make an effort to get along and compromise - but not you. [/quote]



mantra you and I had a similar problem not that long ago.. we sorted it out on PM..maybe you and lisa could try the same.. I dont see Lisa like you do...I dont come on here much but she always seems pretty stable to me..I mean as long as someone isnt whingeing about you or too you what does it matter?.

.I am sure the mods can look after themselves.. at least I hope so and I am sure FD doesnt need us to defend him..strewth, I have enough to do defending myself.. [/quote]

I think it would be a lost cause trying to make peace with Lisa. Perhaps if she laid off the name calling it might help. I find it very offensive to be called a multi troll/flamer/clone, Mad Mantra etc. continually. I understand these references are often made because of the restrictions of her limited vocabulary but that's no excuse.

Sorry Cods but I've seen her put down to many people in the past year. If she's not correcting their punctuation, grammar or demeaning them - she's name calling. She can't even stop at that and has to copy the same highlighted post over and over again ad nauseum - then bump it another dozen times for good measure.

I'll just collect her abusive posts from now on and send them with links to all the mods. Perhaps someone will have the guts to stand up to her.

]


 Poor Lisa ...
admit it - you like  it!!

I mean ... I've rousted on you , and Cods, and methinks at times, Mantra.....  sorry my memory for minutiae (like long past posts)  is taken up with more interesting things .. but oh yes Lisa - Lisa Lisa Lisa ,,,,,<<<

And A Hicks for that matter.... see ur the same....more or less... you like to dish ( nay ..shovel it) out  .....
but you get all angsty when you get it shovelled back at you.

So - don't like it ???
You know where to go.  

Here you go Mod. You like this kind of stuff.

Emma wrote on Nov 20^th, 2011 at 1:40am:


Out of curiosity Jalene - why is the gender of a member so important? Some are happy to disclose it, others aren't. That's their prerogative.

Diddums??!!

Thanks for stuffing up my conversation Jalane, you're a pal. (mentalist) <unsubscribes>

Sorry Grey - didn't realise it was YOUR CONVERSATION>!!

Well smack my wrist!!
'as oo 'spat the dummy' Grey?

That would be a shame.!