buzzanddidj
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 14169
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender:
|
buzzanddidj wrote on Apr 16 th, 2012 at 1:12pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Feb 10 th, 2012 at 8:29am: buzzanddidj wrote on Feb 9 th, 2012 at 11:03pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 20 th, 2012 at 8:20pm: The whole "NOISE" aspect is UTTER NONSENSE ! Unlike the "Landscape Guardians", "juliar" - and the REST of the TROGLODYTES - I have PHYSICALLY "been there" These installations are (naturally) located in rural, VERY WINDY, locations You cannot detect ANY noise from the turbines past 500 metres - due to the sound of the wind roaring through the trees Yet people are believing ( ... in the case of http://hepburnwind.com.au/ ) they can hear them from one and half KILOMETRES away - over the sound of overnight freight lorries rumbling down the highway a kilometre away The NEAREST neighbours ( ... a retired couple) have given the project their BLESSING - fron a KM away The loudest WHINGER is one Jan Perry - of " ...the Guardians" - from near 2KM away buzzanddidj wrote on Dec 21 st, 2011 at 8:33am: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 5 th, 2011 at 12:40am: Quote:Now wind farm opponents have been handed victory on a plate. The Government’s new policy has three main elements:
the government will amend planning laws to give households power to veto wind turbines within two kilometres of their homes.
Turbines will also be banned in the Macedon and McHarg ranges, in the Yarra Valley, on the Mornington and Bellarine peninsulas, and within five kilometres of the Great Ocean Road and the Bass Coast.
And in changes that go further than the Coalition flagged in the policy it took to last year’s state election, turbines will also be prohibited within five kilometres of 21 Victorian regional centres. Wind farms approved by Labor and not yet built will not be affected. The Government claims that 92% of the state is still available for wind farm development, but the people who build them have a different view.
Pacific Hydro say that they will be pursuing opportunities elsewhere after completing current projects.
The Clean Energy Council estimated prior to the election that $3.6 billion worth of investments would not go ahead under the Coalition’s policy. Make that up to $10 billion according to Giles Parkinson at Climate Spectator. Earlier Parkinson had written about the negativity coming from right-wing governments on climate change policy. Barry O’Farrell is on record saying he doesn’t want any more wind farms built The wind doesn’t blow so consistently in Queensland, so theoretically there should be opportunities in South Australia New rules blamed for wind farm loss September 01, 2011 A developer has scrapped plans for a wind farm project in south-west Victoria because of the State Government's new planning rules. The company's managing director, David Shapiro, says it is now abandoning the development. "The Victorian Government has changed the rules and as those rules stand now it simply wouldn't get through the planning framework," he said.
"Our reading of the situation is that really was the intention of Government to make development more difficult." http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-09-01/new-rules-blamed-for-wind-farm-loss/286583...Mr Shapiro says the company is unlikely to launch new developments in Victoria. The Planning Minister has said the new rules would not threaten investment in wind energy. Mr "Planning" Minister ... Investment is ALREADY leaving - in the BILLIONS ... to be welcomed with open arms, in South Australia - a state that BACKS investment in renewable, clean energy I dropped by the Hepburn Wind site today, on the way to Melbourne, for Father's Day I got out of the car, about 200 metres from the nearest turbine
I expected a gentle "hum" from this distance ... But between the occassional bird noise - and a passing car - GOLDEN SILENCE The LOUDEST opponenent FROM where I was, lives over a kilometre FURTHER in the same direction - on the other side of the Daylesford-Ballan Road
She must be Superwoman, with that sort of hearing This photo was a FAKE ... http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2010/12/02/1225964/789277-jan-perry-101202...."It’s right at our front door" . . . Jan Perry, president of Landscape Guardians anti-wind farm group, at Leonards Hill, northeast of Melbourne, yesterday. Picture: Stuart McEvoy Source: The Australian ... set up by JAN PERRY ( ... of Landscape Guardians) and on the payroll of Peter Mitchell , a founding chairman of the Moonie Oil Company and now chairman of Lowell Pty Ltd, which runs an investment fund focused on oil, coal seamgas and minerals. and "The Australian" newspaper Hepburn Wind has TWO turbines NEITHER of which had been erected at the photo's time of publication
AND - underground exit cables i This is Jan Perry's LATEST bout of erratic behaviour ... A sign in the window of a clothing and "nick-nack" shop she owns in Daylesford called "Kabuki" http://i1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa322/buzzanddidj/kabuki.jpgIt should be pointed out, she doesn't live "under 120m turbines" - but, rather, a kilometre and a half away She is by no means the closest neighbour - but the ONLY complainer
SHE - and she ALONE - could have stopped the Hepburn Wind project under Ted Baillieu's anti-renewable energy legislation
Yet the REST of the community, COMBINED, couldn't stop a coal mine and ajoining coal-fired power plant http://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Pics/PORTLAND/anglesea3.jpg Wind turbines not a health problem, say Germans and Danes. April 4, 2012 Over the past four years, claims have been made that large wind turbines cause a wide range of adverse health effects, including tinnitus, headaches and memory and balance problems.
In response to this, there have been 17 Inquiries around the world. All have concluded that there is no scientific evidence for the claims.
This has placed the opponents to wind power on very shaky ground .Now this ground has become even more unstable with the publication of a paper by a former energy economist and researcher, Neil Barrett. Barrett has had a long term interest in wind power since the first turbines were built in Europe in the 1970s. In 2006, he spent a week interviewing people living and working around two large wind farms in Germany . “At that time I heard nothing about any adverse health effects, said Barrett. “Three months ago I contacted some of the people I met in 2006 and they confirmed that health effects from wind power are not a significant issue on the agenda in Germany. This is despite the fact that Germany has around 22,000 turbines in an area not a lot bigger than Victoria and much more highly populated.“Intrigued by the difference between Australia and Europe, I decided to study the situation in both Germany and Denmark more closely. I wrote to MPs and examined over 100 websites of wind opponents, including 80 referred to in glowing terms by Germany’s main conservative newspaper, Der Spiegel. “Denmark’s parliamentary spokesman on energy, Steen Gade, replied: ` The opponents to windpower in Denmark try to raise the issue of adverse health effects but with little success. It is just not an issue which has achieved much traction in this country. Windpower has strong public acceptance and a majority in parliament support the expansion of windpower capacity, both onshore and offshore’. “And the Chief Whip for the Greens in the German parliament, Volker Beck, stated that: `Health effects are currently no issue in the debate about wind power in Germany’. “Even more telling”, writes Barrett, “was the evidence from Wind opposition websites. Of the 80 opposition websites I examined, only 18 devote more than two lines to health effects and not one of them refers to particular cases where individuals have claimed illness or moved away from the turbines. Nor could I locate any press reports of such events . http://yes2renewables.org/2012/04/04/wind-turbines-not-a-health-problem-say-germ... Quote:... there have been 17 Inquiries around the world. http://yes2renewables.org/2012/02/08/wind-farms-health-17-reviews-of-evidence/
|