Australian Politics Forum - Federal Political Predictions for 2012

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012 Reply #60 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #61 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:16am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.

You really live in la la land ,longwhine.
Abbott could not win an election when the ALP were at there all time dog eat dog low, yet you think he can win an election then go to a DD and win a senate majority as well. Talk about delusional, the wanker will be lucky to be leader come election time let alone win. Cheesy

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

mozzaok

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #62 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:26am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2012 at 7:05am:

Did LW post predictions or a wish list?

feel free to attempt your own predictions along with credible support for them. But thats a bit hard to do itsnt it? all you do is criticise others opinions rahter than formulate your own,

Longy formulates his OWN opinions???? That is GOLD. lol

Still, I guess reading the Australian, then copying their ridiculous blather may feel like he is thinking it up for himself.
The only things I have seen which Longy thinks up for himself, are his own "facts", which range from creating his own scientific information, to the ridiculous claims about his personal credentials, always seemingly on the way to, or back from, a high level conference on the pertinent subject he is discussing, be that telecommunications technology, or electric cars.
The one thing he is an expert on however, is Hot Air, perhaps he should go to a Ballooning conference next.

Back to top

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #63 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:47am

____ wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 1:39pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 1:05pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 12:53pm:

What will we get if Tony Abbott becomes PM???

Dump the carbon tax and the revenue that it will generate???

Dump the mining tax and the revenue it will generate???

Dump the NBN no matter how much is laid and forgo any revenue a completed state of the art communications network will generate???

Dump the buyback for the Murray Darling river system and provide no certainty to people in South Australia who will suffer the consequences of such a short sighted policy???

Provide tax cuts to everyone which will be skewed towards high income earners???

Provide a paid maternity leave scheme that rewards wealth and will cost a lot more than Labor’s policy???

Cut 10 000 public service jobs to pay for his negative politics???

Cut 70 billion in services from the budget to pay for his negative politics???

Return to work choices under another name???

Join the war in Iran if the Republicans win the next USA election???

Destroy the environment with direct action that will achieve nothing???

Destroy renewable energy programs in favour of coal mining???

Tony Abbott will destroy Australia if he becomes PM.....that is my prediction!!!

Angry

Now now Phil.
If you were really a genuine Haruspex, the IPCC would already have you making futuristic climate change predictions for them.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, we will all have to wait and see what Prime Minister Abbott actually does achieve during his term.

The Lame Duck Tony Abbott?

Lame because of not controlling the Senate, and lame because the Nats have pulled out of the coalition.

No thinking Australian will vote a guy who has turned business confidence and investment into his kicking ball. No one who wants to be unemployed will vote for Mister No.

Yes they will Green, and your wrong yet again.
Simply because the electorate simply will not tolerate another three years of the lies, incompetence, mismanagement and waste of Gillard / Rudd/ Swan & Co.
It's as simple as that.
And as a great man once stated "Opposition doesn't win elections, Governments lose them".

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #64 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:53am

____ wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 2:36pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 2:30pm:

____ wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 1:39pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 1:05pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2012 at 12:53pm:

What will we get if Tony Abbott becomes PM???

Dump the carbon tax and the revenue that it will generate???

Dump the mining tax and the revenue it will generate???

Dump the NBN no matter how much is laid and forgo any revenue a completed state of the art communications network will generate???

Dump the buyback for the Murray Darling river system and provide no certainty to people in South Australia who will suffer the consequences of such a short sighted policy???

Provide tax cuts to everyone which will be skewed towards high income earners???

Provide a paid maternity leave scheme that rewards wealth and will cost a lot more than Labor’s policy???

Cut 10 000 public service jobs to pay for his negative politics???

Cut 70 billion in services from the budget to pay for his negative politics???

Return to work choices under another name???

Join the war in Iran if the Republicans win the next USA election???

Destroy the environment with direct action that will achieve nothing???

Destroy renewable energy programs in favour of coal mining???

Tony Abbott will destroy Australia if he becomes PM.....that is my prediction!!!

Angry

Now now Phil.
If you were really a genuine Haruspex, the IPCC would already have you making futuristic climate change predictions for them.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, we will all have to wait and see what Prime Minister Abbott actually does achieve during his term.

The Lame Duck Tony Abbott?

Lame because of not controlling the Senate, and lame because the Nats have pulled out of the coalition.

No thinking Australian will vote a guy who has turned business confidence and investment into his kicking ball. No one who wants to be unemployed will vote for Mister No.

Are you referring to the same lame duck Tony Abbott that has his 2nd Labor PM's scalp in his sights.
He's doing his job, pity Labor cant do the same.

So Mr Lame Duck thinks his job is to remove the puppets of the faceless factional men of Labor.

No wonder he is taking the conservatives further into the political wilderness.

Abbott doesn't 'think his job'.
Abbott does his job.
And that is to reduce the publics confidence in the Labor Government which eventually reflects in the polls and then an election.
And he does that by highlighting the Governments blunders and offering unsolicited advice on what the Government should be doing.
The Government has been extremely helpful to Abbott by providing him with a constant stream of blunders for him to report on.
Which is something he has been very good at.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #65 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:21pm

skippy. wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:16am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.

You really live in la la land ,longwhine.
Abbott could not win an election when the ALP were at there all time dog eat dog low, yet you think he can win an election then go to a DD and win a senate majority as well. Talk about delusional, the wanker will be lucky to be leader come election time let alone win. Cheesy

you are starting to sound like lastnail. you make pronouncements that are so obviously wrong it is embarrassing. in august 2010 the parties were polling neck and neck. they are now separated by 12 points. even a mathematical midget like you should be able to work out that 50/50 is not a 'historical low'

and so skippy joins the pansi/vegy/toenail/booby group as irredeemable stupid.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #66 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:23pm

mozzaok wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2012 at 7:05am:

Did LW post predictions or a wish list?

feel free to attempt your own predictions along with credible support for them. But thats a bit hard to do itsnt it? all you do is criticise others opinions rahter than formulate your own,

Longy formulates his OWN opinions???? That is GOLD. lol

Still, I guess reading the Australian, then copying their ridiculous blather may feel like he is thinking it up for himself.
The only things I have seen which Longy thinks up for himself, are his own "facts", which range from creating his own scientific information, to the ridiculous claims about his personal credentials, always seemingly on the way to, or back from, a high level conference on the pertinent subject he is discussing, be that telecommunications technology, or electric cars.
The one thing he is an expert on however, is Hot Air, perhaps he should go to a Ballooning conference next.

and yet I am right far more often than wrong. My predictions on the GFC for example were almost spot on. most of my political predictions are correct too.

and yes, I not only attend but RUN Groundwater training courses. and if you have half the intelligence as you do blather it should be easy to prove.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #67 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:25pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:21pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:16am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.

You really live in la la land ,longwhine.
Abbott could not win an election when the ALP were at there all time dog eat dog low, yet you think he can win an election then go to a DD and win a senate majority as well. Talk about delusional, the wanker will be lucky to be leader come election time let alone win. Cheesy

you are starting to sound like lastnail. you make pronouncements that are so obviously wrong it is embarrassing. in august 2010 the parties were polling neck and neck. they are now separated by 12 points. even a mathematical midget like you should be able to work out that 50/50 is not a 'historical low'

and so skippy joins the pansi/vegy/toenail/booby group as irredeemable stupid.

Thanks for the troll, loser boy, but I should have realised someone as dyslexically challenged as yourself would not be able to comprehend the obvious.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #68 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 3:09pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.

-->>the western australia trick is totally possible!

Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Federal Political Predictions for 2012
Reply #69 - Jan 12^th, 2012 at 3:56pm

skippy. wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 12:21pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 10:16am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

its just the usual woody-wank. 'nats pulling out of the coalition' and that kind of drivel. libs probably cant get a senate majority at the next election, but if they go to a DD election with a strong anti greens and labor swing then it could happen.

You really live in la la land ,longwhine.
Abbott could not win an election when the ALP were at there all time dog eat dog low, yet you think he can win an election then go to a DD and win a senate majority as well. Talk about delusional, the wanker will be lucky to be leader come election time let alone win. Cheesy

you are starting to sound like lastnail. you make pronouncements that are so obviously wrong it is embarrassing. in august 2010 the parties were polling neck and neck. they are now separated by 12 points. even a mathematical midget like you should be able to work out that 50/50 is not a 'historical low'

and so skippy joins the pansi/vegy/toenail/booby group as irredeemable stupid.

Thanks for the troll, loser boy, but I should have realised someone as dyslexically challenged as yourself would not be able to comprehend the obvious.

While mathematics is clearly not your stong suit Id have thought that even a fool can work out that 50 (labor in 2010) is great than 40 (its historical low).

is there anything about maths you understand that you cant do counting on fingers?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged