Australian Politics Forum

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: PRIDE Reply #30 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:57pm epileptic people suck
Back to top	IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: PRIDE Reply #31 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:58pm people with peanut allergies too, they are losers
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: PRIDE Reply #32 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 3:03pm barnaby joe wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:57pm: epileptic people suck Er... they froth. actually.
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: PRIDE
Reply #33 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 3:16pm

What about supposed afflcitions, where the root cause is softness of the cock? Things like ADD, some allergies, food intolerances etc. They need to have 'bullshit' called on them, as there isn't anything that can't be overcome - they just say they've got some disease to be "special"....and if some phony pseudo-doctor somewhere gives it a name, we all have to fall over ourselves to show 'sensitivity' to whatever bogus condition they claim to have.

Quote:

SCHOOLS have banned lunchbox staples such as egg, mayonnaise, Nutella, peanut butter, kiwi fruit and bananas to protect a handful of students with severe food allergies.

Children are not allowed to share food and have to wash their hands and face after recess and lunch to prevent cross-contamination.

While the number of Australian children suffering from food allergies is on the rise, official guidelines on anaphylaxis in schools do not recommend blanket bans.

Many schools forbid all nut products, but some have gone further, to include eggs and egg-based mayonnaise, fish products, fruits and chocolate that may contain traces of nuts.

I realise it's probably more their parents fault. But it's sad that we've come to the point where weakness and failure are so acceptable, that parents are consciously burdening their children with them.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 17^th, 2012 at 5:25pm by ... »

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96384

Re: PRIDE
Reply #34 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 5:47pm

Soren wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:43pm:

Soren wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 2:31pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 16^th, 2012 at 12:30pm:

Either you're playing the usual old boy debating game and are merely arguing the case for the negative (Cert II in Negative Studies), or you really are an unreformed, old school Nazi. You know, the Ernst Rohm type: an obsession with moral hygeine and dirty linen while you enjoy a bit of scatting and S&M on the sly.

Still, I'm going for the former. We teach hyperbole and shock tactics in Advanced Pakistani Rhetoric, so I should know. You are, of course, entitled to your convictions, old boy. But I ask you this: are they really YOUR beliefs?

Typical pissweak PB nonsense. With this kind of crap, PB, you are stuck in the stupid corner where you have painted yourself with the endless, reflex 'yeah but, no but, yeah but, no but' of 'new' school humanities thinking (aka Cert II in Social Work).

Actions have moral dimensions, affliction don't. Calling that nazi is wanting to be stupid - an action, not a mere affliction.

Yes, I noticed you avoided epilepsy, leprosy and madness, the more traditonal stigmas.

I see you are seeking to modernise shame.

You're right though. I am a very "yeah but, no but" kind of guy. Things are not so black and white to me. Lo! How I wish they were!

I see. Every deviance and criminality and stupidity and irresponsibility and anti-social behaviour is waiting for the correct deconstructive normalisation.

Hey, leprosy used to be stigmatised, madness, epilepsy! look at them now! So nothing should be stigmatised. it's all good, we just don't get it.
There are no shameful acts and tendencies, only nice people whose grievances we haven't accommodated and internalised yet.

Got it.

Good. After all, you're a fan of the Enlightenment, no? And from Descartes on, its whole point was to erradicate superstition.

Now us PBs know you can't do this. New ones just pop up in their place. Our great leader, Foucault, made this all too clear, as did our lesser hero and sometimes villain, Freud.

So I'm glad you understand. Some old boys, you see, want the superstitions, stigmas, and idols of the marketplace carefully vetted and selected - presumably by philosopher kings or the superior intellects of the tabloid media.

Perhaps a committee should be formed. Mike Munro and Alan Jones would make marvellous members, not to mention arch old boys, Piers and Gerard Henderson.

Still, the way things are these days you'd need a token PB to to be all PC and spoil everybody's fun.

Yes, Abu's right. The West has become a moral cess pit, hasn't it?

Back to top

IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: PRIDE Reply #35 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 6:56pm stop prattling on with pretentious arcane crap shut up
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96384	Re: PRIDE Reply #36 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 7:11pm barnaby joe wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 6:56pm: stop prattling on with pretentious arcane crap shut up Your posts are on the up and up, Imperium - words! Good work. You'll be in the faculty next. Interested in social work?
Back to top	IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: PRIDE Reply #37 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 7:12pm only if i don't have to wipe
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96384

Re: PRIDE
Reply #38 - Jan 17^th, 2012 at 9:30pm

You've got be joking. We teach others to wipe us. It helps if you're a hideously deformed cripple like most in the faculty. The so-called "able bodied" among us have to bung on a bit of a limp or fake the odd spasm.

Still, thanks to our kind government, I haven't had to cut up food or wipe my arse in years, so there are definately benefits.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: PRIDE
Reply #39 - Jan 18^th, 2012 at 8:33pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 17^th, 2012 at 9:30pm:

You've got be joking. We teach others to wipe us. It helps if you're a hideously deformed cripple like most in the faculty. The so-called "able bodied" among us have to bung on a bit of a limp or fake the odd spasm.

Still, thanks to our kind government, I haven't had to cut up food or wipe my arse in years, so there are definately benefits.

You and Corpulent Whiney. Progress, innit, especially considering how full of shite you are.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 18^th, 2012 at 8:38pm by Soren »

IP Logged

barnaby joe

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena

Re: PRIDE
Reply #40 - Jan 18^th, 2012 at 8:43pm

in all fairness corporate whitey is probably a schizophrenic or something. if you've been following his posts from the beginning you would have noticed how he changes the target of his vitriol and rhetoric every few months or so. once he was babbling about the 'celts', then 'whites' then 'communists', now 'nazis'. i probably got that order somewhat wrong.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: PRIDE Reply #41 - Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:19pm Great, so we have a schizophrenic fatso and a Paki Bugger holding up the 'progressive side'. Between them they almost cover all PC pieties. We need a black feminist Green and we have all bases covered.
Back to top	IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: PRIDE Reply #42 - Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:21pm Soren wrote on Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:19pm: Great, so we have a schizophrenic fatso and a Paki Bugger holding up the 'progressive side'. Between them they almost cover all PC pieties. We need a black feminist Green and we have all bases covered. Greens_win is a gay coconut. That's close enough isn't it?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: PRIDE
Reply #43 - Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:47pm

... wrote on Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:21pm:

Soren wrote on Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:19pm:

Great, so we have a schizophrenic fatso and a Paki Bugger holding up the 'progressive side'. Between them they almost cover all PC pieties. We need a black feminist Green and we have all bases covered.

Greens_win is a gay coconut. That's close enough isn't it?

Very good but not quite enough. We need a nutty woman, otherwise 'progressive' nuttery would be another all-male domain and we would be accused of being, as usual, over-privileged and smug...

Back to top

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: PRIDE Reply #44 - Jan 19^th, 2012 at 1:55pm You can only afford to be smug when you're right, so it's that, and not the smugness that 'progressives' dislike.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged