Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Britain censoring media (Read 4529 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21885
A cat with a view
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #15 - Jan 23rd, 2012 at 1:10pm
 
falah wrote on Jan 23rd, 2012 at 12:16am:
Soren wrote on Jan 22nd, 2012 at 2:16pm:
falah wrote on Jan 22nd, 2012 at 1:45pm:
The West runs blindly towards fascism.

Islam is there already.

http://www.ilyameyer.com/uploaded_images/Hezbollah_Nazi_salute-720110.jpg



You do love misrepresenting Islam with the Shi-ites such as these Shi-ite Hizbullah.







falah,
Are we non-moslems misrepresenting ISLAM when we point to the conduct of Shi-ites, who claim to follow the tenets of ISLAM ???

I don't think so.



But falah,
As a good moslem, as a good Sunni moslem, living in Australia, do you take to yourself the right to kill your own children [if they dishonour your family, or, if they 'rebel' against the authority of ISLAMIC law] ???

Because Sunni ISLAMIC law says that you have that right.

Am i 'misrepresenting' ISLAM, when i point to that tenet of Sunni ISLAM ???




falah,
Who is 'misrepresenting' ISLAM?

Is it we non-moslems?

Or is it the good Sunni-moslems, by their premeditated and intentional omissions, concerning what Sharia permits with regard to 'unbelievers' ?



Quote:

It is no accident or coincidence that Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says......"not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.



http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/01/victim-of-attempted-honor-killing-speaks-out.h...

n.b.
The term "honour killing" used in the Western mainstream media is a misnomer.

Dictionary;
misnomer = = a wrong or inaccurate name or term. the wrong use of a name or term.


These type of moslem-on-moslem murders are justified and 'lawful' [within ISLAM], as the killing of 'rebels' against the authority of ISLAM.

Correct falah ???

"...If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260




falah,

If you are a proud moslem.
If you are a proud of what ISLAM promotes.
And if ISLAM is a virtuous philosophy.

Q.
Why won't you openly reveal to non-moslems, the tenets of belief which ISLAM promotes ?

Is the answer, that you and all moslems, are;
1/ ashamed of your error [in choosing to be a moslem], OR, because you,
2/ are ashamed of what ISLAM/Sharaia promotes and permits?

Hmmm????


"Ye People of the Book! Why do ye clothe Truth with falsehood, and conceal the Truth, while ye have knowledge?"
Koran 3.71


This is an audacious rebuke to Jews and Christians from 'Allah', considering the lying and duplicitous relationship moslems have always had towards those Jews and Christians who are not yet under moslem power.



+++

The fact is, that moslems are only prepared to reveal what ISLAM really promotes, when moslems believe that they have the ability [the political power, the 'licence'] to murder their critics, for 'insulting' ISLAM.

e.g.
As per the 'religiously' justified murders which are happening NOW, in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, etc.


Otherwise in those places where moslems lack political authority, moslems, and the whole moslem community, will blatantly, and intentionally, and deceitfully, misrepresent ISLAM to non-moslems and to naive and trusting non-moslem host communities.


THE TRUTH IS THAT....
Moslems are unwilling to lay ISLAM bare to the scrutiny of non-moslems,
because moslems know that they, moslems, are guilty people.


Moslems know that they themselves are,kuffar.



Quote:

You who embrace ISLAM, your own lies and deception, have become a witness against you, before God......

"kuffar" = = "...is an Arabic word meaning.....[an unbeliever] a person....who hides, denies, or covers the truth."


more on that, here...
"Dear muslim, YOU are the kuffar"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1229682951/0#0



+++

Many ISLAMIC spokesmen living within Western nations have also stated that moslems can obey the law of the country in which they live in,
BUT ONLY WHERE THE LOCAL NON-MOSLEM LAWS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ISLAMIC LAW.

The implication being that, moslems need not obey local laws, WHEREVER local laws conflict with ISLAMIC [Sharia] law.


Google;
muslims can obey a local law which does not conflict with islamic law

Google;
muslims, obey law of land



IMAGE;
...
Voting is kufr -- an expression of your unbelief
Moslem street protest in New York city




IMAGE;
...
ISLAMIC law should replace Constitutional law
Moslem street protest in New York city




see also....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Parliament_of_Great_Britain






+++

When Mohammed lived in Mecca, i.e. WHEN MOHAMMED WAS POLITICALLY INSECURE, and when Mohammed had to rely upon the infidel rulers of Mecca for his saftey, Allah said this...

"Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things."
Koran 2.256

Koran 2.256 is now an 'abrogated' [put aside by Allah] Koran verse, which moslems no longer 'take hold' of.

Then after Mohammed became politically secure in Medina, Allah changed his mind and said this...

"If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him;...."
Koran 3.85


as is explained somewhat here....
Raymond Ibrahim: How Circumstance Dictates Islamic Behavior

Consider this video of Sheikh Yassir al-Burhami, a top-ranked figure in Egypt’s Salafi movement which won some 25% of the votes in recent elections. He makes clear a point that, in a different era, would be thoroughly eye-opening—that all notions of peace with non-Muslims are based on circumstance: when Muslims are weak, they should be peaceful; when strong, they should go on the offensive.
......Burhami is referring to the famous Mecca/Medina division: when Muhammad was weak and outnumbered in his early Mecca period, he preached peace and made pacts with infidels; when he became strong in the Medina period, he preached war and went on the offensive. This dichotomy—preach peace when weak, wage war when strong—has been instructive to Muslim leaders for ages.


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/01/raymond-ibrahim-how-circumstance-dictates-isla...


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106577
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #16 - Jan 23rd, 2012 at 7:14pm
 
Yadda - your posts are too long to read.
Just make a small point & move on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #17 - Jan 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm
 
Not to mention they're laced with so much psycho babble and innuendo that any normal sane rational person will pass most of it by.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49397
At my desk.
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #18 - Jan 23rd, 2012 at 9:39pm
 
So why do you prefer to respoind to Yadda above everyone else Abu?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21885
A cat with a view
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #19 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 12:01pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2012 at 7:14pm:

Yadda - your posts are too long to read.
Just make a small point & move on.





bobby,
falah made the argument.....
Quote:

"You [critics of ISLAM] do love misrepresenting Islam...... "







bobbythebat1,

If i should respond to falah with;

"No falah, you are mistaken."



.....i'm sorry. But that just wouldn't do it for me.       Grin




+++

i.e.
Any fool can have an opinion.

An opinion expressed without proof or reason, is just an OPINION.

And it seems to me, that many of those [the opinions we see expressed in forums], are worthless [i.e. if they are un-informed opinions]!




My reasoning is that, if i want people to take my opinion(s) seriously, then i really need to set out my argument with reasoning, and/or proofs.

And that takes space.

Sorry.




But hey bobby, if my posts are a 'pain' for ya brain........
........then when you see the word >> YADDA << in the post header, then just pass over the post, without trying to read it.

How does that work for ya ?      Wink

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21885
A cat with a view
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #20 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 12:17pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Jan 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

Not to mention they're laced with so much psycho babble and innuendo that any normal sane rational person will pass most of it by.




Yes Abu, it is so, so difficult for a sane, rational person, to demolish the arguments made by an irrational 'psycho', in an internet forum.
Its so much more sensible to ignore, the arguments made by irrational 'psychos'.
/sarc off

Coz, only someone who is irrational and unhinged, would dare to criticise Allah's perfect religion, ISLAM.
/sarc off

......what with all of the threats such a course is likely to attract.




+++


John 3:19
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20  For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21  But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49397
At my desk.
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #21 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 8:52pm
 
Abu why was the anti-semitism thread deleted? Are we allowed to discuss Falahs opinion about Jews?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #22 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 9:49pm
 
Firstly because it slanders him, he is not an anti-Semite, and you well know it.

Secondly Soren was posting too much of his usual nonsense.

More to the point, why is Soren unbanned from this forum?
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49397
At my desk.
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #23 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 10:11pm
 
I clarified that when I said he is an anti semite I meant he hates Jews so that you would not get all pedantic about the terminology.

I think a lot of the bans were lost with the software upgrade.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49397
At my desk.
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #24 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 8:22am
 
Abu, are we allowed to discuss Falah's attitude towards Jews, or is this now on your list of censored topics?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59186
Here
Gender: male
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #25 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 8:38am
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 22nd, 2012 at 3:39pm:
If you want to be a journalist here in Australia you have
to do a one week course to learn what you are - and what you're not allowed to say.
I would call that censorship.

It goes on in every country - including FREE Australia.

I think they would basically show you what may get you put into jail or taken to court for libel etc.

Not aware of this in NSW though and know a lot of people in journalism.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #26 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:18pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 24th, 2012 at 10:11pm:
I clarified that when I said he is an anti semite I meant he hates Jews so that you would not get all pedantic about the terminology.


I don't hate Jews. I believe in treating Jews fairly. I condemn the Christian genocide of Jews in Germany, England, Russia and Spain. Look at history, and you will find it is Christians that genocide Jews, and Muslims that provide them sanctuary.

Ironic that you would take issue with this when this is such an outpouring of hate towards Muslims on this forum.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49397
At my desk.
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #27 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:34pm
 
So you don't mind if I start a new thread to discuss some of the things you have been saying about Jews?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59186
Here
Gender: male
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #28 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:41pm
 
With the British media in the state they are I would have thought fair cause to de register some of the Murdock rubbish but no we get this. Unbelievable.

The state of the media news business is at an all time low it seems around the western world at least.

In Aust News Ltd were censored for their deliberate bias and dishonesty but have continued on their merry way as if nothing happened.

Aparently nobody important has any fear of the regulators at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106577
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Britain censoring media
Reply #29 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 2:16pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 25th, 2012 at 8:38am:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 22nd, 2012 at 3:39pm:
If you want to be a journalist here in Australia you have
to do a one week course to learn what you are - and what you're not allowed to say.
I would call that censorship.

It goes on in every country - including FREE Australia.

I think they would basically show you what may get you put into jail or taken to court for libel etc.

Not aware of this in NSW though and know a lot of people in journalism.



The course  was all about what you are & aren't allowed to say.
This included vilification of people based on race, gender etc.
Our media is very tightly controlled.
It's not a free press here.
That's why these interent forums are more exciting -
you can say almost anything that you truly believe in
without going to jail - although that of course will change soon
as very strict laws & interent censorship is upon us.

Enjoy a fairly free internet for now - it won't last.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print