Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Do we have the technical ability to build 12 new top subs?

yes    
  9 (52.9%)
no    
  7 (41.2%)
don't know    
  1 (5.9%)




Total votes: 17
« Created by: Bobby. on: Mar 3rd, 2012 at 6:06pm »

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
12 new subs- technically possible? (Read 22595 times)
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #180 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 5:43pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 4:27pm:
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
Of the 6x 'Collins' subs,  we have about 2 full crews available.

I believe that the cook on one of them earns more than the Chief of Navy!

Such are the 'incentives'.

OC


That is the problem that simple minds like BigOl & Viewpoint have failed to see.
Only bribery can get people to work in a coffin.


You have admitted on more than one occasion that you are a coward anbs would never do anything that may put you in harms way regardless of the situation. What Im saying that not everyone is like you, thank god.

People, good people will always put themselves in harms way to ensure the security of our country, you are just not one of them.

I dare say like every other thread on defence I know a great deal more than you about the 'silent service'.






Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106925
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #181 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:04pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 5:43pm:
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 4:27pm:
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
Of the 6x 'Collins' subs,  we have about 2 full crews available.

I believe that the cook on one of them earns more than the Chief of Navy!

Such are the 'incentives'.

OC


That is the problem that simple minds like BigOl & Viewpoint have failed to see.
Only bribery can get people to work in a coffin.


You have admitted on more than one occasion that you are a coward anbs would never do anything that may put you in harms way regardless of the situation. What Im saying that not everyone is like you, thank god.

People, good people will always put themselves in harms way to ensure the security of our country, you are just not one of them.

I dare say like every other thread on defence I know a great deal more than you about the 'silent service'.




BigOl,
you think you know everything.

I know a guy who worked as a sailor in an Australia submarine.
He reckons it was terrible.
Everyone was so covered in diesel fumes that it took a week to
get rid of the smell after they went on leave.
Whenever he tried to take a shower on the sub there was
always some homo trying to look at him or touch him.

The submarine service is either for people with a death wish or homos.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #182 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:07pm
 
My BS Detector just went off!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #183 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:11pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:04pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 5:43pm:
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 4:27pm:
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
Of the 6x 'Collins' subs,  we have about 2 full crews available.

I believe that the cook on one of them earns more than the Chief of Navy!

Such are the 'incentives'.

OC


That is the problem that simple minds like BigOl & Viewpoint have failed to see.
Only bribery can get people to work in a coffin.


You have admitted on more than one occasion that you are a coward anbs would never do anything that may put you in harms way regardless of the situation. What Im saying that not everyone is like you, thank god.

People, good people will always put themselves in harms way to ensure the security of our country, you are just not one of them.

I dare say like every other thread on defence I know a great deal more than you about the 'silent service'.




BigOl,
you think you know everything.

I know a guy who worked as a sailor in an Australia submarine.
He reckons it was terrible.
Everyone was so covered in diesel fumes that it took a week to
get rid of the smell after they went on leave.
Whenever he tried to take a shower on the sub there was
always some homo trying to look at him or touch him.

The submarine service is either for people with a death wish or homos.



You always know some bloke who luckily seems to be an expert in what ever subject you need to bullsh1t about and sedipitously agrees totally with your point of view.  Grin


You even feel the need to tell me all about how I did my job, because of one of these expert blokes that you seem to know; bugger mate you're a civilian, start acting like one, by not pretending to be a frggen expert on everything military.



People still enlist and the still serve in pretty hash conditions, because not everyone is a soft c0ck!



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106925
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #184 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:17pm
 
BigOl,
I worked with an Air Force technician & a submariner for many years
& they recounted their experiences to me.
I will continue to publish comments from people who have actually
worked in the industry we are talking about without your permission.

you are forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BlueJam
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #185 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:42pm
 
What's this nonsense about smelling like Diesel fumes - get with the program and the times. In the RAN that was old types of submarines such as the Oberon Class which did not have a sealed off section from the engine to the rest of the boat.(note Australia did not have any submarines during WWII, it did have a very old Dutch crewed boat it supported off WA during this time to practice antisubmarine defence) The Collins Class has three engines located across different sections of the boat. They are sealed off and the modern air scrubbers combined with OHS legislation ensure that toxic crap is not floating around the boat.

Hence this is why all the Submariners who crewed O Boats stank of diesel fumes. Those who transited to Collins from O Boats joke how they in the past could always be identified on land long before being ID by their Dolphins by the stink of diesel which had worked its way into the pores of their skin and hair remaining even after a good scrub/bath. Collins Class Submariners do not have a diesel smell as this was deliberately included into the compartmentalisation of its design for OHS and survivability reasons.

As to how you cannot swing at cat in a Collins I suggest you see if you can get on board and see how much room they actually have. Compare it with an Oberon such as the boat that is docked at Darling Harbour I'm sure you will spot the difference.

Bit of trivia - Georg von Trapp (The father of the family of which the Sound of Music movie is loosely based) served in the Austrian submarine service in the First World War. Primitive diesel submarines, crappy ventilation and no snorkel system meant that he suffered significant health problems for the rest of his life.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106925
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #186 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:58pm
 
That's true Jam,
it must have been an Oberon sub because he hadn't been on a Collins sub.

The stink of diesel was terrible apparently.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42433
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #187 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:18am
 
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 1:57pm:
We should get out the cheque book, and go see the USN,  and buy 6x 'Virginia' class hunter-killers.

problem solved!


OC


No, that would introduce a whole raft of other problems.

Perhaps the greatest problem is that we would beholden to the USA to refuel those boats as we have no nuclear infrastructure of our own to do it.

Then there would be the problem of being beholden to the USA to train the nuclear technicians required to run the nuclear reactors in the boats.

Finally, there is the problem of disposal, once the boats have run their lives.   We do not have the facilities to ensure long term, safe storage of highly radioactive nuclear piles and fuel.

All that, apart from the problem that the US does not export nuclear submarines.  They do not trust other nation's with their military nuclear technology.
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106925
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #188 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:23am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:18am:
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 1:57pm:
We should get out the cheque book, and go see the USN,  and buy 6x 'Virginia' class hunter-killers.

problem solved!


OC


No, that would introduce a whole raft of other problems.

Perhaps the greatest problem is that we would beholden to the USA to refuel those boats as we have no nuclear infrastructure of our own to do it.

Then there would be the problem of being beholden to the USA to train the nuclear technicians required to run the nuclear reactors in the boats.

Finally, there is the problem of disposal, once the boats have run their lives.   We do not have the facilities to ensure long term, safe storage of highly radioactive nuclear piles and fuel.

All that, apart from the problem that the US does not export nuclear submarines.  They do not trust other nation's with their military nuclear technology.



The Yanks wouldn't sell us:
the F117,  the F22 or the B2 bomber.

We only get what they let us have.
They buried the F117s rather than let anyone have them.

There is no way they would sell us nuclear subs.
We're just pawns in a much bigger game.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42433
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #189 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:34am
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 2:02pm:
Old Codger wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 1:57pm:
We should get out the cheque book, and go see the USN,  and buy 6x 'Virginia' class hunter-killers.

problem solved!


OC


I don't thinks so.
No one with half a brain would want to work in an underwater coffin
which is all subs are.


They are actually extremely effective weapon systems, Bobby, which are extremely difficult to find and destroy, which is why they are so valuable as a means of deterrence for Australia.  With them, any potential attacker must invest large amounts of money, time and effort in acquiring the means of detecting and destroying them if they intend attacking us.

Your comment was extremely insulting to every submariner who serves in the RAN and I would suggest you reconsider it (although, it appears you've decided instead to dig yourself an even deeper hole.  Where is your enlightenment now, I ask?  In the dirt?   Roll Eyes  ).
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42433
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #190 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:41am
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:23am:
The Yanks wouldn't sell us:
the F117,  the F22 or the B2 bomber.

We only get what they let us have.
They buried the F117s rather than let anyone have them.

There is no way they would sell us nuclear subs.
We're just pawns in a much bigger game.


You really do need to work on the acceptance part of enlightenment, Bobby.  Really.
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #191 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 4:22am
 
Blue jam,


"As to how you cannot swing at cat in a Collins I suggest you see if you can get on board and see how much room they actually have."


My comment there was made in direct reference to a USN WW2 sub (see post #175).  That sub was the USS 'Pampanito' in San Francisco.

OC

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 8th, 2013 at 6:24am by Old Codger »  
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #192 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 4:28am
 
AFAIK, Australia has NEVER expressed any interest in buying the F117, or the B2.

The F22 is no longer in production and export has ALWAYS been banned for that aircraft.

As for refueling a 'Virginia' class sub with nuke fuel, I would fully expect that that would be part of a contract with the USN.  I have a vague memory that they only require about 2 or 3 refuelings over the expected life of the sub.  I may be wrong on that.


OC
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #193 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 6:18am
 
bobby,


"They buried the F117s rather than let anyone have them.'


That is interesting, I never knew that, they usually send them to Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson AZ.

Do you have a link?


OC



Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 8th, 2013 at 6:29am by Old Codger »  
 
IP Logged
 
viewpoint
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male
Re: 12 new subs- technically possible?
Reply #194 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 6:22am
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 6:17pm:
BigOl,
I worked with an Air Force technician & a submariner for many years
& they recounted their experiences to me.
I will continue to publish comments from people who have actually
worked in the industry we are talking about without your permission.

you are forgiven

namaste


You worked with...... Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

And what prey tell did you work at......being an idiot!

You are pitied.....


Back to top
 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print