Karnal wrote on Feb 10
th, 2012 at 11:44am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10
th, 2012 at 10:53am:
... wrote on Feb 10
th, 2012 at 10:47am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10
th, 2012 at 10:40am:
Karnal wrote on Feb 9
th, 2012 at 4:48pm:
Can't argue against that, Honky.
I wouldn't argue against that either, Honky.......mostly because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever...
You wish it didn't.
Oh I agree that it IS the 'ideology'...it's just it's pretty much semantically null...It uses lots of words, to say basically nothing...
True, but just for fun, let's unpack it.
"The order of things" is a structuralist term. Foucault wrote a book called the Order of Things - his pivotal structuralist work before he moved onto the connection between language and power: what is often called "post" structuralism.
Structuralism is not a war on anything. It's a school of thought that arose from anthropology. It merely seeks to decode the underlying structure within language, culture and meaning.
How can you declare a war on systems of representation?
Against "the structure of the world that presently exists?" By definition, you can't.
I have no idea what Honky's been reading, but I'm not sure that he gets it.
I think you're 'unpacking' the wrong bag. I thought gizmo was talking about the other thread, the one I linked to. Or maybe he wasn't.
Still, you can't 'declare war on prices' but retailers regularly claim to, and you know excatly what they mean.
When you seek to undermine traditional instituitons - marriage, the family, race, gender etc etc etc and replace them with a 'one-size fits all ' approach which reduces individuals to blank slates, you could be said to delcare war on them, even though you're not actually firing guns.
Don't be a facetious prick all your life. Try having a thought of your own rather than foucault this and derrida that. It might be beyond you, but it won't hurt to try.