Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
What came first? (Read 3867 times)
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
What came first?
Feb 28th, 2012 at 7:33am
 
The Chicken or the Egg?
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: What came first?
Reply #1 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 9:47am
 
The egg came first because the mutations that made the chicken we know today happen in a generational process.
The chicken that gave birth to the egg would not be the chicken we know today, but the egg is.. due to gene mutation that was not present in the previous generation.
So definetley the egg.
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #2 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 12:27pm
 
bobbythefap1 wrote on Feb 28th, 2012 at 9:47am:
The egg came first because the mutations that made the chicken we know today happen in a generational process.
The chicken that gave birth to the egg would not be the chicken we know today, but the egg is.. due to gene mutation that was not present in the previous generation.
So definetley the egg.

So what came first the previous version of the chicken or the egg?
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: What came first?
Reply #3 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 2:41pm
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Feb 28th, 2012 at 12:27pm:
bobbythefap1 wrote on Feb 28th, 2012 at 9:47am:
The egg came first because the mutations that made the chicken we know today happen in a generational process.
The chicken that gave birth to the egg would not be the chicken we know today, but the egg is.. due to gene mutation that was not present in the previous generation.
So definetley the egg.

So what came first the previous version of the chicken or the egg?

Same dealio
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: What came first?
Reply #4 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 3:50pm
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Feb 28th, 2012 at 7:33am:
The Chicken or the Egg?


knowing what males can be like, probably the rooster....
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
Super Nova
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3071
Everywhere
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #5 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
The Chicken or the egg causality dilemma is commonly stated as "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" To ancient philosophers, the question about the first chicken or egg also evoked the questions of how life and the universe in general began.[1]

Cultural references to the chicken and egg intend to point out the futility of identifying the first case of a circular cause and consequence. It could be considered that in this approach lies the most fundamental nature of the question. A literal answer is somewhat obvious, as egg-laying species pre-date the existence of chickens. However, the metaphorical view sets a metaphysical ground to the dilemma. To better understand its metaphorical meaning, the question could be reformulated as: "Which came first, X that can't come without Y, or Y that can't come without X?"

An equivalent situation arises in engineering and science known as circular reference, in which a parameter is required to calculate that parameter itself. Examples are Van der Waals equation and the famous Colebrook equation.

----

The theory of evolution states that species change over time via mutation and sexual reproduction. Since DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken eggs. These eggs then hatched into chickens that inbred to produce a living population.[12][13] Hence, in this light, both the chicken and the structure of its egg evolved simultaneously from birds that, while not of the same exact species, gradually became more and more like present-day chickens over time.

Not any mutation in one individual can be considered as constituting a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.

The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[14] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.

This implies that the egg existed long before the chicken, but that the chicken egg did not exist until an arbitrary threshold was crossed that differentiates a modern chicken from its ancestors. Since this arbitrary distinction cannot be made until after the egg has hatched, one would have to first find the original chicken, then from this find the first egg it laid.
---

While it appears to be a circular problem if I had to choose an answer from the choice of the two it would be ... the egg came first.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #6 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 9:04pm
 
Wouldm't the chicken just have laid eggs from the outset?

An ancestor of the chicken might have produced soft gluggy eggs (think frogs) and over a heap of evolution that may have turned into the hard shelled things well now all know and love - with the chicken itself carrying the mutation to lay the hardshelled egg - not the other way around.

I'd put my money on the chicken - or it's distant relative.

Then again..... God created the chicken that layed eggs and God said it was good. Final story, but again the chicken.

Unless....

God created the egg and from that was layed the first chicken and God said it was good.

Alas that chicken pecked around for a few years and then died of loneliness.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Super Nova
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3071
Everywhere
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #7 - Feb 28th, 2012 at 11:55pm
 
Life_goes_on wrote on Feb 28th, 2012 at 9:04pm:
Wouldm't the chicken just have laid eggs from the outset?

An ancestor of the chicken might have produced soft gluggy eggs (think frogs) and over a heap of evolution that may have turned into the hard shelled things well now all know and love - with the chicken itself carrying the mutation to lay the hardshelled egg - not the other way around.

I'd put my money on the chicken - or it's distant relative.


I follow the logic. The mutation had to be contained in an egg that was not from a chicken. Only when the chicken hatched from the non-chicken egg did the first chicken arrive to lay the first chicken egg.

I think now I have to go chicken following that logic.

However, the question did not specify a chicken egg. So if the chicken come from a non-chicken egg, an egg all the same... then it is egg.

However consider the first egg. A mutation had to occur in a pre-chicken bird/reptile however it was gestated to form the first egg..... so it has to be the first egg laying reptile/chicken.

Ummm.... I think it has to be the chicken.... thanks for helping me clarify my thinking, I think. Smiley
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
zumba
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Central NSW
Gender: female
Re: What came first?
Reply #8 - Mar 1st, 2012 at 9:48am
 
I'm sure this debate will still be going on in 100yrs.  Roll Eyes who care's we have them now, thats all that matters.
Back to top
 
dont+have+it  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #9 - Mar 2nd, 2012 at 10:47pm
 
Well eggs were around at least 190 million years ago. The species were different then (sauropods), but that common structure persisted right up to the first birds that we could call proto-chickens. The archeopterix was arguably one of the first birds and it too was hatched from eggs, and it existed long before the modern chicken was even a twinkle in the eye of the rooster.  Grin

...

Eggs were around for hundreds of millions of years before the first chicken.
Dilemma? What dilemma?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 2nd, 2012 at 10:52pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
nairbe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2587
Rural NSW
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #10 - Mar 7th, 2012 at 9:46pm
 
The first multiple cell organism came first, from there all things evolved. sorry god created it all how silly of me.
Back to top
 

"Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage."
Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #11 - Mar 7th, 2012 at 9:52pm
 
The chicken.

If you don't know why by now, you're never going to get it.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40764
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #12 - Mar 8th, 2012 at 7:52am
 
nairbe wrote on Mar 7th, 2012 at 9:46pm:
The first multiple cell organism came first, from there all things evolved. sorry god created it all how silly of me.


and you think this because ...........
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
nairbe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2587
Rural NSW
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #13 - Mar 8th, 2012 at 8:03pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 8th, 2012 at 7:52am:
nairbe wrote on Mar 7th, 2012 at 9:46pm:
The first multiple cell organism came first, from there all things evolved. sorry god created it all how silly of me.


and you think this because ...........


Which part, the scientific theory of probability or the fairy tale of the bible.
Back to top
 

"Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage."
Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: What came first?
Reply #14 - Mar 9th, 2012 at 9:29pm
 
The chicken came first.

What else sat on the first egg until it hatched?
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print