progressiveslol wrote on Mar 16
th, 2012 at 5:49am:
Jules Gillard at her lying best
From 2005
Quote:The Labor Party is the party of truth telling. When we go out into the electorate and make promises, do you know what we would do in government: we would keep them. When we say them, we mean them. That is the difference between you and us. If I were minister for health in an elected government, it would be my duty to implement lock, stock and barrel—word for word—exactly what we had promised in the election campaign. That is your obligation.
Dont know about the site link, but it is on there somewhere.
http://www.kevinruddthedisaster.com/ non-core promise
A commitment to deliver (a service, funding, an item) that is subsequently set aside. The broken promise is then explained with the glib expression "oh, but that promise was non-core".
Now generalised to non-political situations, too.
Origin: Australian federal elections at the turn of the 20th/21st centuries. The conservative party (known as the Liberal/National coalition) made a number of election promises which were broken soon after the election. The prime minister, John Howard, attempted to explain this behaviour by claiming that some promises are "core" and some are "non-core" and thus, don't count.
Not only did "No tax increases, no new taxes" turn out to be a non-core promise,
but in the campaign, Howard had also given a solemn undertaking that "I'm not going to break any promises"
. That one was certainly non-core.
Laurie Oakes (Australian political reporter/writer)
Excerpt from National Nine News (network TV) 12 May 2005
as quoted at news.ninemsn.com.au
So your immeasurably small mind has immeasurably short memory. The question is how Abbott will survive now he has wrecked it for all future politicians. He will be sacrificed if he even sways slightly after using this issue to relentlessly attack a Government. Good luck losers you are backing a fly blown sheep