Yes, it's like Arthur and Martha, Methyl and Ethyl ...

Ethyl mercury is the preservative component in some vaccines. Bodies can remove ethyl mercury, it doesn't bioaccumulate. This is different from methyl mercury, found in trace amounts in certain fish like tuna.

BTW ... I had my Flu shot last Monday. Very happy to have it compared with getting the Flu which can be fatal. 

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 30^th, 2019 at 1:48pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 30^th, 2019 at 2:47pm:


many blessings

you don't scare me sad sack

you keep projecting your threatening rhetoric because

you have been defeated on every topic you engage me on ..

you will excuse me when I  continue without your permission or approval 

you simply wont learn and thats so sad, and boo hoo for you

WHAT BIG PHARMA DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW: - Your Nutrition, Your Health & Your Gut

Your world is about to change

POTUS knows the truth and he will fix it

So bojack horseman better learn to code

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2019 at 4:57am:




A 5 yrold tweet? HOly poo I am scared. One idiot pres against the entire scientific community

https://www.ageofautism.com/2011/09/lab-finds-hpv-dna-in-blood-of-gardasil-recip...

Lab finds HPV DNA in Blood of Gardasil Recipient 2 Years Post-Vaccination

Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination
13 different vaccine vials – 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested: Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

SANE Vax Inc. contracted with an independent lab to test for contamination and found HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) in 13 vaccine vials. The Gardasil vials with different lot numbers were from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. 100% of the samples tested positive for the presence of the genetically modified HPV DNA.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist at the Milford Hospital pathology laboratory well-known for using cutting-edge DNA sequencing for molecular diagnoses, was initially contracted to examine a single sample of Gardasil for possible contamination. This sample tested positive for recombinant HPV-11 and HPV-18 residues, both of which were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.

In a certified letter mailed to FDA Commissioner, Dr. Margaret Hamburg on August 29, 2011, SANE Vax Inc. requested ‘the FDA investigate the extent of the HPV DNA contamination in the Gardasil HPV4 vaccine currently on the market and take appropriate actions to ensure public safety regarding future shipments.’ 1.

Why Did SANE Vax Inc. Investigate Possible Gardasil Contamination?

The mother of a sexually naïve adolescent girl who developed acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours of her last injection of the Gardasil™ series contacted SANE Vax Inc. looking for more information.

In an effort to help her now very sick daughter the mother went to an MD practicing naturopath who conducted a toxicity test that eventually found HPV DNA in the girl’s blood. The significance of this finding is that it is highly unusual to find HPV DNA in the blood. HPV, if present in the body, exists in the epithelial (skin and mucosa) membranes. HPV or its DNA, by itself does not survive for any great length of time in the bloodstream. Why was the HPV DNA in her bloodstream two years post-vaccination?

Natural vs. Recombinant DNA

According to Dr. Lee, “‘Natural HPV DNA does not remain in the bloodstream for very long. However, the HPV DNA in Gardasil™ is not ‘natural’ DNA. It is a recombinant HPV DNA (rDNA) – genetically engineered – to be inserted into yeast cells for VLP (virus-like-particle) protein production. rDNA is known to behave differently from natural DNA. It may enter a human cell, especially in an inflammatory lesion caused by the effects of the aluminum adjuvant, via poorly understood mechanisms.

“Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA.”

What is a Recombinant DNA Virus?

Recombinant DNA (rDNA) refers to novel DNA molecules engineered by joining natural or synthetic DNA segments to other DNA molecules so that they can replicate in a living cell. The possibility for these replicable forms of DNA as uncertain toxic substance or as environmental hazard has been a concern since rDNA technology was invented in 1973. Thus, rDNA is considered a potential biohazard, and NIH has mandated that research institutions monitor and regulate its use.2.

All recombinant or genetically engineered DNAs are considered potential biohazards if injected intramuscularly into the body. Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV4 vaccine is administered intramuscularly – as are many other vaccines. However, Gardasil™ is the first vaccine found to be contaminated by a genetically engineered DNA used to manufacture virus-like particle proteins for the vaccine.

SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA should have required Merck to test for, evaluate and quantify the risks of residual recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil™ before granting approval for marketing the vaccine. SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA should require every lot of Gardasil™ be tested for residual HPV DNA prior to shipment.

Gardasil Patient Product Insert Stated No Viral DNA’s in the Vaccine.

In fact, Merck’s Gardasil™ Patient Product Inserts stated that there is ‘no viral DNA’ in the Gardasil vaccine. That is until April 2011 – when the line was glaringly absent from U.S. product inserts. 3.

The European Medicines Agency on line literature still states: ‘Gardasil is an adjuvanted non-infectious recombinant quadrivalent vaccine prepared from the highly purified virus-like particles (VLP’s) of the major capsid L1 protein of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18. The VLP’s contain no viral DNA; they cannot infect cells, reproduce or cause the disease.’ 4.

My friend's child is on the spectrum, it's sad but they're dealing with it.  The kid is such a bright and inquisitive child and it seems unfair.

But during the process of disgnosis, it turns out my friend, in his 40's was told for the first time that he's also on the spectrum but has been undiagnosed his entire life.

Could it be, if your stats are even true (which, it's you, so that's unlikely, no time to fact check yet), it doesn't point to vaccines as the cause.

It could be that diagnosis is much better these days then it was in the 80s.

So a quick fact check, and it seems you're lying or gullible and wrong again.

The actual figures if you care to look them up, show firstly that the CDC did not start tracking autism until 2007, in which 1 in 150 was the stat.  There are no official stats for 1983, the number is an estimate.

In 1983, there were 3 vaccines, and in 2013 immunisation schedule only lists 10 vaccines recommended for babies up to 24 months of age.

As I suspected, the medical consensus is that there hasn't been an increase in autism in children, but better diagnosis and more over the criteria has widened today as more is known about the disorder meaning some children who are given the diagnosis today would not have been in the 80's,

Quote:


Facts matter.  If you have to lie and present false information to prove your case, it makes you wrong.

So what does this mean?

When, in Light's world, it means he's defeated me, because HIS claims have been debunked and he's been shown to be spreading lies and fake news, AGAIN.

You couldn't even be bothered to do 10 minutes of fact checking, going directly to the source such as the CDC but instead, you're content with bloggers and facebook groups pushing their uninformed opinions as facts.