https://avn.org.au/information/vaccine-injury/vaccinevictimsofaustralia/

Vaccine Victims of Australia

This is our page for all of those whose lives have been adversely affected by vaccines and who need to be heard finally…
Tasha’s story
When I first became a Mum, I never questioned getting my children getting vaccinated. It was just what you did when you have children, you do what your doctor tells you, because they know best. My husband and I had never been told that there could be any adverse reactions, only a bit of redness and swelling at the injection site. So as each of our six eldest children got progressively sicker after each vaccination, we never made that connection.

Out of our six vaccinated children, our 19, 15 and 13yr old have moderate to severe Autism, our 28yr old has ADHD, our 17yr old has a severe language disorder, and our 23yr old has severe mood swings. They also suffered from chronic ear infections, pica, dyspraxia, bronchiolitis, asthma, eczema, psoriasis, urinary infections, gastrointestinal and autoimmune disorders, allergies, chemical sensitivities and intolerances.

Our two most severely Autistic daughters have had to suffer the most with staying in nappies till they were around 7 years old, poo smearing and eating, absconding on to busy roads, not being able to sleep at night, not being able to communicate, self injury such as even pulling their own toenails out. We wanted to understand what had happened our children so we tried genetic testing to look for answers, but no reason was found for our children’s afflictions and since there was no Autism on my side or my husband’s side, we knew it could not have been inherited.

So I started looking for answers on my own, I read books, went to seminars, read all the scientific studies I could get my hands on and that’s when I discovered that our family was not the only one. There were many other families suffering from the same issues as ours. I found a great new GP who confirmed what we already knew that our children have a genetic susceptibility to adverse vaccine reactions.

This realization led us to not vaccinate our 10 and 8yr old and they have thrived because of it. Out of all their siblings they should have been the most susceptible to genetic problems considering that I was in my late 30’s (as was my husband) when I had them and was now overweight. Yet our two youngest never had to suffer through the many illnesses that their brothers and sisters did, not because they had never been exposed to illness because like all preschool and school children, they had been. But they had a resilience that had been taken from their siblings. They have never had or needed an antibiotic in their lives, but more importantly they had none of their sibling’s disorders.



This was an especially bittersweet realization for me, as I looked at them and realized just how much my other children had lost because of me. I had to come to terms with the fact that my ignorance about what I allowed to be put in to my children’s bodies had caused at least two (possibly three) of my children to NEVER be able to have the chance to be independent, fall in love and have a family. That when I die, they face the possibility of living with strangers who don’t love them the way they deserve to be loved.

People need to realise that vaccination is not one size fits all, that there are families in your community that are struggling with the harm that vaccines have caused. Have we so quickly forgotten Saba Button[1], Ashley Epapara[2] and Lachlan Neylan?[3] This is why vaccination must always remain a choice, otherwise we are saying that some children matter more than others.

This issue has been thrown in to the spotlight once again by the tragic loss of four week old Riley Hughes to Whooping Cough. My heart goes out to this family, no parent should ever have to suffer through the death of their child.

Unfortunately a few journalists have seized on this tragedy to create more hatred and animosity towards innocent children and their families. They are recklessly setting parents against each other and in the process they are doing a great disservice to this family and to the other families that are not aware of the shortcomings of this vaccine.

In 2009 a fully vaccinated nurse is suspected to have infected four infants with Whooping cough in a maternity ward in Sydney[4], as well as several studies since then that show that this vaccine is not providing the protection[5] that our children deserve[6].

In 1991 we had a 71% vaccination rate for Whooping cough[7], yet there were only 347 cases[8], but in 2011 with a vaccination rate of over 92%[9] we had over 38,000[10] cases. How can the unvaccinated be to blame?

Pregnant women need to be aware that vaccine product inserts say that the effect of this vaccine on the development of the embryo and foetus has not been assessed. Vaccination in pregnancy is not recommended unless there is a definite risk of acquiring pertussis[11].

did you get this vaccine recently ?

you should not trust vaccine companies ..

https://ifspb.com/zostavax-shingles-vaccine-injury-lawsuit/

Zostavax Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit – Here’s What You Need to Know

Lawsuits are being filed on behalf of patients across the country who experienced serious and life-changing injuries and complications from the Zostavax shingles vaccine. These patients are seeking significant compensation for their injuries. Our attorneys are fierce advocates for patients and consumers who are harmed by the medications they need to stay healthy. If you or your loved one suffered a serious injury or severe health complication after receiving the Zostavax vaccine, you have rights by law. We defend those rights and help you get the maximum compensation available for your injuries.

What’s Going On?
Vaccines have eliminated many dangerous viruses and saved countless lives since they were first introduced in the 1700s. In most cases, the benefits of inoculations outweigh the risks, but that may not always be the case. Some vaccines have been associated with serious adverse events that may be more severe than the viral infections they were designed to prevent.

Some patients who received the Zostavax vaccine against the painful and debilitating condition shingles have suffered adverse events and serious health consequences that have and will continue to have a detrimental effect on their lives and the lives of their family members. Many of the patients who suffered a serious injury after receiving the vaccine are suing Zostavax maker Merck. These patients accuse the manufacturer of designing, making, and selling a product that can cause chickenpox, vision loss and blindness, spinal inflammation, and shingles, the very condition the vaccine was supposed to prevent.

If you or a person you love received the Zostavax vaccine between 2006 and 2017 and suffered a severe adverse event within a year of being injected, contact us now. You may be entitled to significant financial compensation.

Thousands of Adverse Events Reported
Thus far, and the tally continues to increase, more than 36,000 adverse event reports have been published by the National Vaccine Information Center, including reports of spinal inflammation, corneal inflammation, retinitis, vision loss, chickenpox, and even shingles. Some of the most serious adverse events that have been reported in patients after receiving the Zostavax vaccine include:

Acute myelitis
Bell’s Palsy
Blindness
Chicken Pox
Corneal Band Keratopathy
Encephalitis
Hearing loss
Herpetic Uveitis
Herpes Zoster Keratitis
Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
Herpes Zoster Oticus
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Meningitis
Necrotizing Retinitis
Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
Ramsay Hunt Syndrome
Retinal Uveitis
Shingles
Spinal Cord Inflammation
Stroke
Thrombocytopenia
Vasculitis
Vision loss
Contact us now if you if were injected with Zostavax between the years of 2006 and 2017 and you were diagnosed with any one of the adverse events listed above within a year of getting the shot. You may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses including medical costs, missed wages, and even compensation for your pain and anguish.

Vaccine Recipients may be Transmission Sources
In 2014, the FDA required Merck to change the label of Zostavax to show the vaccine can actually cause some people to develop shingles. While the label already warned that some people might develop chickenpox after receiving the vaccine, the manufacturer did not warn that the vaccine could cause shingles in some patients despite being created to reduce the chances of developing the painful condition.

Even more concerning – you may not have to get the shot to be affected. The Journal of Infectious Diseases published a study in 2011 that proved to be quite concerning. Researchers analyzed 36 patients who received the Zostavax injection. Researchers took swabs of the injection site and saliva samples over a period of 28 days. They found that the virus remained active in 21 of the study participants, and on the skin at the injection site of 18 patients. This means that patients who receive the vaccine could potentially transmit the live virus to other people for about a month after injection.

Contact Us Now, We Can Help
If you, a family member, or someone else you love was injected with the Zostavax vaccine between 2006 and 2017 and developed any of the serious side effects or adverse events listed on this page within a year of getting the shot, contact us today. We have been fighting for the rights of people harmed by the medicines and products that they depended on for decades, and we stand ready to fight for you and your family now.

Lawsuits are being filed on behalf of individuals and families across the country seeking justice and compensation for the injuries they suffered and will continue to suffer after being injected with the Zostavax vaccine. Dozens of lawsuits have been filed in Pennsylvania state and federal court to be heard by Judge Denis Cohen and Judge Harvey Bartle III respectively. In fact, so many lawsuits have been filed in federal courts that Merck has requested they be consolidated to multidistrict litigation. These lawsuits allege the Zostavax shingles vaccine caused them to suffer severe side effects and adverse events such as vision loss, blindness, and other serious and life-changing injuries.

If you or someone you love received a Zostavax shot between 2006 and 2017, and you developed any of the serious adverse events we listed above, contact us as soon as possible to see if you are eligible to seek significant financial compensation for your Zostavax injuries.

Call Now For a Free & Confidential Case Evaluation 877-571-8918

https://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/zostavax-lawsuit-update.html

so many toxins to dumb down society ..

just have a gander at some of the random sad sacks around here

and you will get an inkling of what we are up against ,

yet all are loved , and so it goes

namaste

Vaxers simply hate facts ..

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/12/health/cdc-vax-advisers/index.html

Anti-vaxers are winning the war on social media. What's the CDC going to do about it?

Updated 1902 GMT (0302 HKT) April 12, 2019

(CNN)Concerned that anti-vaccination activists are winning the war on social media, advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say public health authorities need to figure out how to fight back.

"Have we done enough? I think the answer to that is no," said Patricia Stinchfield, a pediatric nurse practitioner and a liaison representative to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
While anti-vaxers were once considered fringe, there are now dozens of anti-vaccine groups on Facebook trying to convince parents of various untruths, such as that vaccines cause autism.

"This anti-vaccine issue has been driven by social media and will continue to be driven by social media," said Dr. Matthew Zahn, another liaison representative to the committee. "I don't see it as a scenario we are going to win anytime soon."
The results have become painfully obvious. As vaccination rates have declined, measles rates have increased.
This year, at least 465 cases of measles have been reported in the United States, according to the CDC. That's the second highest number of cases in the country in any year since 2000 -- and the year isn't even halfway over.

'The good guys haven't gotten themselves organized'
To get an idea of what the CDC and others could do to combat anti-vaxer propaganda on social media, CNN interviewed 10 current and former liaison members of the CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which develops recommendations on the use of vaccines.
They represent professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners.
Although none of the liaison members was critical of the CDC, they said the agency could play a role in finding a more effective approach for encouraging vaccination on social media.
"I feel like on social media, the anti-vaxers are very sophisticated and active and way ahead of us," said Stinchfield, who, as senior director of infection control at the Minnesota Children's Hospital, helped manage a large measles outbreak in 2017.
Liaison member Dr. William Schaffner added, "I don't think the good guys have gotten themselves organized. There's a frustration that we don't have a clear plan going forward. It's almost as though we've left the field to" the anti-vaxers.
Some of the advisers said the CDC could, for example, fund social media outreach efforts and then help study which work best.
How vaccines stop diseases like measles


It's unclear whether the agency itself thinks public health needs to up its social media game.
A representative declined an interview, instead issuing this statement:
"Parents have many questions about vaccines and are seeking answers. There is a lot of information about vaccines available, unfortunately, some of the information about vaccines is inaccurate. It is critical that parents and anyone seeking information about vaccines have access to credible information. CDC is a critical source for credible health information about vaccines. We are committed to providing up-to-date, science-based recommendations that anyone, including parents, kids, health departments, businesses, and healthcare providers, can use to make informed health decisions. Additionally, CDC's online information is in the public domain and free for anyone to access, use or repurpose.
"When CDC engages in social media, we aim to consistently provide science-based and timely information in understandable language. We provide information to parents and the general public. We also focus on providing information to health care providers that they can utilize to talk to their patients. Parents still trust their healthcare provider to help them make healthcare decisions."
Getting into the mud
The challenge for public health authorities, including the CDC, is formidable: to dislodge the fear of vaccines that anti-vaxers have planted in the minds of some parents.
"It's a lot easier to instill fear in someone's head than to remove it," said Dr. Sean O'Leary, another liaison member. "And I think the scientific community was somewhat caught off-guard by this."
Explaining that more than a dozen studies have shown no link between vaccines and autism might not help.
"The conventional wisdom has been to provide the scientific facts, and people will make the right decisions," O'Leary said. "But I think it's a lot more complicated than that."

In February, The BMJ reported that the CDC was claiming antivirals “save lives” even while the Food and Drug Administration was warning Roche that it could not make that claim in its marketing because oseltamivir “has not been proven to have a positive impact on the potential consequences (such as hospitalizations, mortality, or economic impact) of seasonal, avian, or pandemic influenza.” In other words, there was no evidence the drug worked, but CDC Director Thomas Frieden was publicly claiming otherwise.

This recommendation went to physicians who prescribed the drug to their patients, telling them it would “save” their “lives” or at least shorten the duration of their illness.

By the way, the FDA also promotes drugs based on bogus industry studies and payments from the drug manufacturers, as I told you in my report “Emails show pay-for-play scheme in drug trials.”

And Big Pharma uses a similar marketing technique with physicians. It pays physicians exorbitant fees to endorse its products in industry papers and in speeches on behalf of its drugs at conventions. Doctors also receive kickbacks for prescribing certain drugs over others, even if those drugs are prescribed for off-label purposes.

Lawsuits have revealed that more often than not that industry papers are ghost written by the pharmaceutical company’s PR hacks and the physicians just sign their name to them without reading or understanding the research in order to receive the fee.

The legal drug business is a multibillion-dollar scam on the people, and government has no interest in keeping people “safe.” I laugh when people claim government agencies are necessary to protect the people from drug makers and the other “greedy capitalists.” Many government agencies are funded by corporations and serve as revolving-door job programs between government and the corporations they supposedly oversee.

is the imagery false ?

you tell us then sad one ..

how many vaccines does a child have by the age of 2 ??

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Too shy to post the truth eh ?

1. How many vaccines are required by the drug company mandate, for the first 2 years of human life , according to their funding and co opting your government / govern mind through billion dollar donations .. ?

Answer the question or admit to your incompetence .