Australian Politics Forum - question for longy

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #30 - Apr 6^th, 2012 at 3:56pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 3:20pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:59pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:11pm:

Sorry thought use were talking about the governer general

even then you are wrong. the GG cannot MAKE laws and his power to not declare laws is not used.

He can on behalf of the queen
and on behalf of the queen he can stop laws

no he cannot make laws on behalf of the queen. did you learn nothing at school?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

perceptions_now Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11694 Perth WA Gender:	Re: question for longy Reply #31 - Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:08pm longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:59pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:11pm: Sorry thought use were talking about the governer general even then you are wrong. the GG cannot MAKE laws and his power to not declare laws is not used. However, they (the GG) can sack elected governments!
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #32 - Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:11pm

perceptions_now wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:08pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:59pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:11pm:

Sorry thought use were talking about the governer general

even then you are wrong. the GG cannot MAKE laws and his power to not declare laws is not used.

However, they (the GG) can sack elected governments!

that is one of their reserve powers but not on their own initiative. the point is that PP is woefully wrong about the GG.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: question for longy
Reply #33 - Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:59pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 3:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 3:20pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:59pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:11pm:

Sorry thought use were talking about the governer general

even then you are wrong. the GG cannot MAKE laws and his power to not declare laws is not used.

He can on behalf of the queen
and on behalf of the queen he can stop laws

no he cannot make laws on behalf of the queen. did you learn nothing at school?

The queen using her represenative can repeal and create law
Quote:

A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty's representative in the Commonwealth, and shall have and may exercise in the Commonwealth during the Queen's pleasure, but subject to this Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may be pleased to assign to him.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #34 - Apr 6^th, 2012 at 5:09pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:11pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 4:08pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:59pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 1:11pm:

Sorry thought use were talking about the governer general

even then you are wrong. the GG cannot MAKE laws and his power to not declare laws is not used.

However, they (the GG) can sack elected governments!

that is one of their reserve powers but not on their own initiative. the point is that PP is woefully wrong about the GG.

I was simply making a comment, without getting into the rights or otherwise of the discussion!

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: question for longy Reply #35 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:34pm bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 9:57am: Longy, why do you support a pedo sex club? I thought I would bring this thread and this post back to the top so the ignorant and the blind can see it.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: question for longy
Reply #36 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:35pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:34pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 6^th, 2012 at 9:57am:

Longy, why do you support a pedo sex club?

I thought I would bring this thread and this post back to the top so the ignorant and the blind can see it.

The church supports pedo's by covering up their crimes and making sure that they are not brought to justice..
Is this acceptable behaviour to you?

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

bobbythefap1 Gold Member Offline Posts: 7026 Listen now to the rain	Re: question for longy Reply #37 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm Do you have the balls to answer it longy?
Back to top	A day without sunshine is like night. IP Logged

Dsmithy70 Gold Member Offline ire futuis vobismetipsis Posts: 13147 Newy Gender:	Re: question for longy Reply #38 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm: Do you have the balls to answer it longy? Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?
Back to top	REBELLION is not what most people think it is. REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself. Gavin Nascimento IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: question for longy
Reply #39 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:42pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

What has his faith got to do with the crimes of an organization he supports?
How is it wrong to question someone for supporting an organization that supports paedophiles, given that he knows this and still supports them does that not make him in part a supporter of paedophiles?

But if his faith is actually in an organization that supports paedophiles then he does deserve to be critisized and called out for such actions.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #40 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:45pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

I have made complaint about the original post to perceptions_now who has refused to even consider it. I have forwarded it to FD who after a week has still done nothing.

The standard of moderation has always been erratic at best but this is truly pathetic. I dont believe anyone on here should be labeled a pedo or as a supporter of such. When I was moderator I suspended anyone who did so. Apparently the standards have dropped considerably.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: question for longy
Reply #41 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:45pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

I have made complaint about the original post to perceptions_now who has refused to even consider it. I have forwarded it to FD who after a week has still done nothing.

The standard of moderation has always been erratic at best but this is truly pathetic. I dont believe anyone on here should be labeled a pedo or as a supporter of such. When I was moderator I suspended anyone who did so. Apparently the standards have dropped considerably.

Probably why you are not a mod anymore, you cant suspended people for speaking the truth.

Tell me, if protecting paedophiles and making sure they never face justice for their crimes is not supporting paedophiles...What is it?

This is not an attack on your faith
This is a simple question
Why not just answer it if I am so wrong like you claim..

And seriously you cannot complain, you verbally attack people in almost every post you make.
If I was as childish as you I could have reported you for hundreds of things but I dont and have the balls to answer your questions.
Now that is some cold hard fact for your ass

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

Dsmithy70

Gold Member

Offline

ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #42 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:49pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:42pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

What has his faith got to do with the crimes of an organization he supports?
How is it wrong to question someone for supporting an organization that supports paedophiles, given that he knows this and still supports them does that not make him in part a supporter of paedophiles?

But if his faith is actually in an organization that supports paedophiles then he does deserve to be critisized and called out for such actions.

His faith is in a god, he probably had no choice in what sect his parents raised him.
Anyway he doesn't need me to defend him.
And yes I call him on the same events as you, the difference is I wait until he tries to tar another organisation as a ring of peado's.

Back to top

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: question for longy
Reply #43 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:52pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:49pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:42pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

What has his faith got to do with the crimes of an organization he supports?
How is it wrong to question someone for supporting an organization that supports paedophiles, given that he knows this and still supports them does that not make him in part a supporter of paedophiles?

But if his faith is actually in an organization that supports paedophiles then he does deserve to be critisized and called out for such actions.

His faith is in a god, he probably had no choice in what sect his parents raised him.
Anyway he doesn't need me to defend him.
And yes I call him on the same events as you, the difference is I wait until he tries to tar another organisation as a ring of peado's.

Right then if is faith is in a god then shouldnt it annoy him that a human organization who have exploited his name are now supporting paedopiles?
He has tried to tar another organisation as pedos, I have seen him do it a few times in regards to the labour party.

So now what?

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: question for longy
Reply #44 - Apr 16^th, 2012 at 8:00pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:52pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:49pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:42pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:40pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Apr 16^th, 2012 at 7:37pm:

Do you have the balls to answer it longy?

Does it make you feel superior to question someones faith, saddle them with the crimes of others?

What has his faith got to do with the crimes of an organization he supports?
How is it wrong to question someone for supporting an organization that supports paedophiles, given that he knows this and still supports them does that not make him in part a supporter of paedophiles?

But if his faith is actually in an organization that supports paedophiles then he does deserve to be critisized and called out for such actions.

His faith is in a god, he probably had no choice in what sect his parents raised him.
Anyway he doesn't need me to defend him.
And yes I call him on the same events as you, the difference is I wait until he tries to tar another organisation as a ring of peado's.

Right then if is faith is in a god then shouldnt it annoy him that a human organization who have exploited his name are now supporting paedopiles?
He has tried to tar another organisation as pedos, I have seen him do it a few times in regards to the labour party.

So now what?

the difference O stupid one, is that I dont call labor supporters 'supporters of a pedo sex ring' like you do, despite the labor party having a proven record of this problem.

You need to learn the line that isnt to be crossed, before someone crosses it for you.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged