polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 23
rd, 2014 at 4:39pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 23
rd, 2014 at 3:23pm:
It's from the article you used Gandalf.
Correct - and it says she was wed at age 6, a point that no one disputed
And broken at 9.
Quote: Quote:The most logical conclusion from the available evidence is that Muhammed had sex with the little girl before she reached puberty.
um no.
.
OK you got me there Gandalf.
Quote:I have no idea if he had sex with children or not, FD.
Not that there's anything wrong with that, right Brian?
Quote:Your entire reasoning is framed in your own moral milieu.
Tell me Brian, if I joined NAMBLA, or traveled to Thailand or some Muslim country where everyone else is doing it, would it then be OK for me to have sex with children?
Quote:You have to first determine what Arabian society 1400 years ago considered a "child".
No I don't. We are speaking English Brian. She was 6 years old when she was married off to the 50 plus year old man next door. She was a child, by any definition, despite the protestations from Muslims such as Gandalf that the marriage was based on mutual love and respect.
Quote:Finally you have to determine if it was forbidden by their laws, FD. You've done none of that
Yes I have. It just flew right over your head. Muhammed made the laws. He made it legal to rape children. Therefor it was legal. All good eh Brian?
Quote:No, today it isn't in Australia to have sex with someone below the age of consent. Your question however, if directed to what Mohammed did 1400 years ago, is pointless, FD.
So why have you been rabbiting on about Muhammed's motivations for having sex with children? What was your point?
Quote:Moreover, how can children today, suffer because of a man who died 1400 years ago?
I know you can figure this one out for yourself Brian, being a genius and all (not that there's anything wrong with that).