Soren wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 8:55am:
Religion and science are motivated and sustained by the same metaphysical bottom line: the ultimate unity of the universe.
Facts are aggregated into laws, laws into principles, principles into ultimate essence. Science wouldn't work otherwise. even the kookiest superstitions work on the underlying assumption of the unity of the whole. Religion likewise is about the ultimate unity of the world.
Death or the starry sky above may provide the impetus to thinking but that thinking is based on universality, on unity. We can't think otherwise.
Of prime importance to the function of what we know as 'the universe' is the validity of,
1/ truth and,
2/ those 'cosmic' laws, which constrain and maintain the order of 'the universe'.
Without that essential truth and without those essential laws, the universe,
and our world would be subject to unending catastrophic chaos.
But thankfully, chaotic circumstances [eventually] work themselves out, into a semblance of order.
e.g.
If you drop an egg off the edge of a precipice, some moments of 'chaos' will follow, ......but that moment of chaos will soon be 'resolved' - because eggs hanging in air, over a precipice, cannot ignore the law of gravity.
But do these circumstance,
and these truths, mean [suggest] that a god [a creator] is absent from the universe, and that what we [humans, now] subsequently observe is merely the the aftermath of a period of the chaos of the 'creation' of our 'universe' ???
Well, the atheists will all concur that that is true [i am sure].
No need to worry yourself about a creator God.
The earth was made of a 'compilation' of cosmic matter which found itself within our solar system.
And we humans [and all other living creatures] evolved from what were once molten rocks on the surface of the earth.
My great, great, great, great, great, great, granddaddy was a molten rock.
Hey, we all once, were just lifeless particles at the centre of the 'big bang'!
You know that it is true!
+++
Within the 'cosmos', it is [imposed] 'laws' which end and constrain chaos.
We either choose to believe that that statement is true, or, we don't.
Me, i believe it.
I believe in order,
and i believe in those laws, which compel order within the cosmos.i
NorthOfNorth wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 9:26am:
Soren wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 8:55am:
Religion and science are motivated and sustained by the same metaphysical bottom line: the ultimate unity of the universe.
Facts are aggregated into laws, laws into principles, principles into ultimate essence. Science wouldn't work otherwise. even the kookiest superstitions work on the underlying assumption of the unity of the whole. Religion likewise is about the ultimate unity of the world.
Death or the starry sky above may provide the impetus to thinking but that thinking is based on universality, on unity. We can't think otherwise.
The desire for union with the One.
To live a life imbued with meaning in the absence of doubt. Yup, that is correct.
That is what 'it' is all about.
Hey, conviction is the art of being certain.
And hey, i have found my 'certainty'.
John 3:36
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
And why are some people willing believe in faerie tales, while many others are 'realists' ???
Well, really, i suspect, that what we are able to believe often comes down to our base motives.
Some people can 'believe' in an ordered [and created] universe.
Whereas, some other people have a gaining in mind.
I can't 'explain' it [the divergence of 'belief'], any other way.
Yadda - believer in faerie tales.