Dnarever wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:40pm:






WHO WHAT WHERE IS IT CLAIMED THEY CAME TO HIM?????????


as far as I have made out he was in a hotel full of union delegates..

would he really have them visit him when he knew he was being set up with hookers????...LOL...


YOU MAKE THE MOST BIZARRE  CLAIMS...

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:55am:


He paid for hookers. If the mistake was made that you had to go to a brothel for that, then it could be an easy mistake to make.


It has been the consistant claim for about 2 years - but apparently not this week.

Thompson says have a look at the film from the Brothels, The conservatives then say but you didn't go to the brothels, even though that was exactly what they had been claiming for years now.

Oh please - I heard this EXACT SAME THING - more than a year ago and yet nothing ever went to air.

They've obviously made the call that the story is now big enough to risk the potential defamation suite.

If ACA want to pay me $60,000 I'm happy to swear an avidavit saying he paid me to have sex with him

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:09am:





wow thats good to know...

I didnt see it did I miss much?

I am getting my daily dose of sleazy on here.

you guys have to be joking if you believe a hooker paid 60k for an interview isnt going to say whatever the heck they want her to say.  She is for sale. Offer her 70k and get her to say she never saw him before.

SOB

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 6:36am:

Oh he must be guilty if an online poll says so. Dimwit in a skirt.

skippy. wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:45am:





you mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it isnt soooooooooooooooo

I have to concede that the ONE aspect of the whole barrage of allegations against Thompson that made me wonder if it may have been at least partially unfounded was the fact that NO prostitutes had come out with a story saying they did get money for services from him.
Even though it is not illegal, it would have damaged his credibility in the public eye.
Yet after so many years, none had so far come forward, despite the fact that we already know that they do not limit their choices in how they make money, like most others.
A very significant proportion are heroin addicts, and as such, are usually in great need of money, so any who could prove themselves credible enough, could get a very big payday, from the sleazy tabloid scum, cash for comment crowd.
But for years none took that potential paycheque, bearing in mind that the opportunity to do so disappears the moment that Thompson is found guilty of something, and resigns, or is sacked.
So I have to admit to having very grave reservations about the bona fides of such a claim, at this late stage.

It may prove to be credible, it may not, and the CASH component of the story means that if they go with the hooker with a heart of gold, who just could not bear to see the Parliament brought into disrepute, so is providing her story free, will not be accepeted at face value, and friends or relatives who magically have their mortgage disappear, or discover a long lost inheritance, would also be in the sights of those who would investigate any such a claim. Dangerous waters for a TV station to go be swimming in.

In fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9, we could see a whole set of new programming if that happens.
He may start showing, things like;
Ripleys, Believe It or Not,
or Films like;
Shame
Downfall
Outside The Law
Endgame
Deception,
Sex, Lies and Videotape,
as movies of the week,
and one just for his old mate Tony,
10 Things I Hate About You.

I will watch with interest.