Australian Politics Forum - Stand by for more Thomson

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #300 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #301 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 9:26pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Yeah, right. As if anything were ever going to happen to Howard in the absence of a cast-iron criminal court conviction. And even then he'd probably get a slap on the wrist.

Loser.

Hypocritical loser! Tongue

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #302 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 11:10pm

ah ha ....AWB.... the biggest coverup of the Howard era, But by NO means, the ONLY.

It was clear from the information available at the time, that the AWB WAS paying mucho money to the Iraqi regime run by( ''what's is name??) you know ...him. Roll Eyes

... damn ... Hussein ?? f'n memory.!! Then again, ... a LOT of BLOOD has run since then. Sad

To me ... that smacks of some kind of soulless greed rampant in the AWB, and the Howard govt. To, on one hand, send our young men to die, while on the other, paying kick-backs to that ENEMY killing our youth, sent by the Howard govt. IT IS SO SCANDALOUS ... and whats worse-- is NO ONE in Australia said BOO, at the time.!!!!
Didn't want to be disappeared?? Cheesy

Now we have a brave man willing to open up some of this most disgusting exercise of fascist control of the people and govt.
HOPE HE isn't disappeared, or SMEARED with the typical LIB self- protection..and let the people of Australia know, just who, and what , they idiolised at that time. SHAME SHAME SHAME.

This is not the country I want to live in....... but it is my home.

Kick these creeps right where they need it.

INTO POLITICAL OBLIVION.!!!!!

THERE is NO WAY Australia needs an LNP govt.
It's the LAST thing we need.
Let this diverse and fractious government crew, commanded very skillfully by Cap'n Gillard, have a CHANCE to make real inroads on the mess left by the former govt.

LONG MAY THEY REMAIN IN OPPOSITION.!

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Prevailing Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7169 Stop Men	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #303 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 11:30pm Julia Gillard will never be as Australian as me and she has no right to lie to or defy the will of the Australian people. She can piss off back to the UK.
Back to top	I condemn Male Violence Against Women The Government Supports Gynocide There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #304 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 11:44pm

Care to elucidate us on your diatribe,...?

ooops!!
no .... don't bother, if its about 'juliar' ...that's really on the old now....so your input is not of value.
Hey, I am an Australian, but I wasn't born here. Were you??, apparently not.! You show a foreign flag.!!! YOU f'off back to where YOU came from. Smiley

Spew your spite somewhere else....... hopefully fullface into a howling gail.!! You get it??

A prevailing wind.!! Tongue

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Prevailing Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7169 Stop Men	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #305 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 11:52pm That flag grew here on this continent fighting for Australias independence from trash like you.
Back to top	I condemn Male Violence Against Women The Government Supports Gynocide There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #306 - Jun 7^th, 2012 at 11:57pm oops OK -- my error- that was the Euraka Stckade flag.... I knew that?? sigh.... bit carried away in the flow-- don't you know.?
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #307 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 12:01am

And I wrote my reply before your post. Thanks for the trash bit, 'cos I deserve it.!!

BUT
most if not all of those who fought under this flag.... which embarrassingly, given my earlier post, I'd like to see as our national flag, or at least part there of, most of those folk were not born here, anymore than many many of Australians of today were.

Sorry tho... je suis desole. Lips Sealed

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #308 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 9:31am

Gist wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Yeah, right. As if anything were ever going to happen to Howard in the absence of a cast-iron criminal court conviction. And even then he'd probably get a slap on the wrist.

Loser.

Hypocritical loser! Tongue

not really... the line in the sand has been drawn...

its called the THOMO line..

INNOCENT UNTIL--------charged.

a bit like shreddergate..until someone is charged..well they have to keep digging dont they?

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58828
Here
Gender: male

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #309 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:09am

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Tha thread is pointing out how easy it would be for Thomson to plead guilty, I see no problem with pointing it that Howard and his ministers had the same opportunity, guilty or not as is suggested of Thgompson.

Back to top

IP Logged

PoliticalReality

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #310 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:12am

cods wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 9:31am:

Gist wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Yeah, right. As if anything were ever going to happen to Howard in the absence of a cast-iron criminal court conviction. And even then he'd probably get a slap on the wrist.

Loser.

Hypocritical loser! Tongue

not really... the line in the sand has been drawn...

its called the THOMO line..

INNOCENT UNTIL--------charged.

a bit like shreddergate..until someone is charged..well they have to keep digging dont they?

Sigh ... convicted you idiot

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Labor MP pleaded guilty - it's easy Thommo
Reply #311 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:18am

PoliticalReality wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:12am:

cods wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 9:31am:

Gist wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:55pm:

nairbe wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

How about Heffernan..he is acused of bashing a man simply because he was gay.
Slipper is accused of winking at a fella and the opposition are likening him to kiddy fiddling catholic priest hopped up on viagra and red bull.

Well the media are getting bored with Thomo, now they are bringing up other past problems like the AWB?

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/cop-told-make-awb-probe-go-away-201...

Interesting that the Police investigation believed they could prove that the Howard government ministers knew all about the payments to Iraq.

The Howard Government were aparently providing material support to an enemy if this was true - well as a matter of fact they were required to know and responsible either way.

Had the same standards been applied thay would have all been in the cell next to David Hicks with him being probably the only one innocent of the charge.

I seems to me that none of them were pleading guilty either?

unfortunately for you, YOU have established hte 'innoncent unless proven guilty' as the ONLY standard of behaviour so basically. YOU ARE STUFFED. Howrad etc did nothing wrong. perfectly innocent of every single minor thing. Didnt even take a paper clip. Unless of course you have a court judgement that says the opposite.

Yeah, right. As if anything were ever going to happen to Howard in the absence of a cast-iron criminal court conviction. And even then he'd probably get a slap on the wrist.

Loser.

Hypocritical loser! Tongue

not really... the line in the sand has been drawn...

its called the THOMO line..

INNOCENT UNTIL--------charged.

a bit like shreddergate..until someone is charged..well they have to keep digging dont they?

Sigh ... convicted you idiot

what the?..

Back to top

IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #312 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 2:19pm cods wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:18am: Sigh ... convicted you idiot what the?.. PERHAPS this is your prob Cods.... ITS innocent until CONVICTED. Idiot. Do you really believe anyone charged by police IS GUILTY???? My Goodness me...no wonder you don't comprehend why people have a go at you.!!!
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #313 - Jun 8^th, 2012 at 4:49pm

Emma wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 2:19pm:

cods wrote on Jun 8^th, 2012 at 11:18am:

Sigh ... convicted you idiot

what the?..

PERHAPS this is your prob Cods.... ITS innocent until CONVICTED. Idiot.
Do you really believe anyone charged by police IS GUILTY????
My Goodness me...no wonder you don't comprehend why people have a go at you.!!! Roll Eyes

thank you for that well the answer anyway.. I was in a hurry so didnt study it..well it is a HUGE mistake I grant you and you have had a ball with it.. so it did some good well done to cods. for making your day.

Back to top

IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #314 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 12:16am

So here we are - still.

Disappointed the mole tunnelled away into oblivion??

Time for you all to learn a lesson, ..... you need to think before you make the sorts of hateful remarks so many of you gleefully spewed out, when, in your ignorance, you believed something you read or heard on what would have to be the 'worst' C A program on Teev , for yrs now.

Goes for our strictly manipulated media in general. Like I said, long ago, you remind me of the cackling stinking old biddies splattered by blood everytime Mdme Guillotine claimed another
head.

Feel ANY shame at all? I wonder.

If you do, there is hope for you yet.

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged