Australian Politics Forum - Stand by for more Thomson

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #45 - May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:09am:

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:05am:

I set it up, anyone with half a brain could have knocked it out the park.

The loony right response should have been, (if they were not all dumber than dirt)

Quote:

or Films like;
Shame, on Thompson, his
Downfall will come, because he behaved
Outside The Lawso that brings us to the
Endgamewhere his
Deception,will be exposed, by
Sex, Lies and Videotape,
as movies of the week,
and one just for his old mate Tony,
10 Things I Hate About You.

Come on guys, do some of the lifting, I am still waiting to be convinced you know something that I have not been privy to, stop holding out.
What do you guys KNOW, (I am using that in the literal sense, so, "he looked like he was lying", or stuff like that won't past muster) about what has been proven about Thompson, that you are not telling, because I am still waiting to see the evidence.

Well, like in real life, you have to make a judgement call on what is garbage and what is worth your time. This gets you through the day without getting information overload and wasting valuable time that is in short supply.

I just so happened to skip that part of your thread because of the lead up, went into my sifting garbage mode. Quick scan, no thought needed about the content, except if you knew or cared there was a hidden message.

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.

funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??

thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59054
Here
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #46 - May 24^th, 2012 at 10:29am

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.

funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??

thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #47 - May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

BlOoDy RiPpEr

Gold Member

Offline

aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #48 - May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Back to top

host of the aussie-patriot.com site

IP Logged

Dsmithy70 Gold Member Offline ire futuis vobismetipsis Posts: 13147 Newy Gender:	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #49 - May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective.
Back to top	REBELLION is not what most people think it is. REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself. Gavin Nascimento IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #50 - May 24^th, 2012 at 1:00pm Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Dsmithy70

Gold Member

Offline

ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #51 - May 24^th, 2012 at 1:04pm

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!

You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa.
Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

Back to top

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento

IP Logged

Phallic Baldwin

Senior Member

Offline

Phallic Baldwin

Posts: 370
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #52 - May 24^th, 2012 at 1:27pm

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat.

Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #53 - May 24^th, 2012 at 1:43pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!

You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa.
Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

Read my comment again - it was inclusive!!!

Second - the scrutiny on Thommo would be even more if these markings are identified. So it's up to Thommo to disprove it to ease the pressure

Therefore it's it's actually not in Abbott's interest to make the demand

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96369

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #54 - May 24^th, 2012 at 1:50pm

Phallic Baldwin wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:27pm:

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat.

Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

Phallic Baldwin, I'll thank you to stop impersonating Matty. Cease this nonsense at once.

Back to top

IP Logged

PoliticalReality

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #55 - May 24^th, 2012 at 2:09pm

Phallic Baldwin wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:27pm:

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat.

Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

He HAS been stood aside, very early on he stood down as Chair of the Economic Committee and he's now been suspended from the Party and is excluded from the Caucus

You do realise that there is actually NOTHING else that Gillard can do to him - he's not elected to Parliament on her say so - She is the PM on his ...

Back to top

IP Logged

PoliticalReality

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #56 - May 24^th, 2012 at 2:10pm

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own. He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

Back to top

IP Logged

BlOoDy RiPpEr

Gold Member

Offline

aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #57 - May 24^th, 2012 at 2:14pm

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own. He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs?

Back to top

host of the aussie-patriot.com site

IP Logged

PoliticalReality

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #58 - May 24^th, 2012 at 2:29pm

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:14pm:

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own. He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs?

There was no settlement on costs - either way

Just because you say it doesn't make it true

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #59 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:21pm

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:29am:

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.

funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??

thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth.

The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged