Australian Politics Forum - Stand by for more Thomson

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #60 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:23pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option?

the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #61 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:25pm

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:29am:

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.

funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??

thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth.

The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds.

No. It wasnt because his guilt was obvious. It was because anyone charged with a crime like that violent or murder is held until its determined they are safe to let out or for a certain amount of hours (yeah I think its 48 hours and if nothing has turned up they have to let them go). It was the nature of this offense. He was still presumed innocent though legally.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #62 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:25pm

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:29pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:14pm:

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own. He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs?

There was no settlement on costs - either way

Just because you say it doesn't make it true

on the same hand, YOUR say-so doesnt mean anything either. Thomson initialted a foolish defamation suit and pulled it once he realised fairfax had PROOF. and since the NSW police have also said that it was true, he has no leg to stand on.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #63 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:23pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option?

the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely.

Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #64 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:28pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:29am:

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.

funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??

thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth.

The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds.

No. It wasnt because his guilt was obvious. It was because anyone charged with a crime like that violent or murder is held until its determined they are safe to let out or for a certain amount of hours (yeah I think its 48 hours and if nothing has turned up they have to let them go). It was the nature of this offense. He was still presumed innocent though legally.

SOB

garbage. when arrested you go straight to the cells. police may decide to grant bail or the courts may decide to do so instead. either way, ARREST and CHARGED carries with it an implict declaration of guilt and often punished as such even without a court case.

The point is that some of you seem to think 'presumption of innocnce' is some kind of magic wand that keeps everyone away from any recknoing of their deeds. it has never been that way nor meant to be. you simplify it to ridiculous levels.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #65 - May 24^th, 2012 at 3:31pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:23pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option?

the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely.

Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466

SOB

Ive read it and it is an idiotic - almosty breathtakingly silly post. It contructs scenarios that are implausible simply to say that Thomson could be innocent. Not at any point in this ridiculous fantasy does it seek the simple or obvious conclusion. It is the very worst example of investigation. it starts with a conclusion and then works backs constructing an elaborate set of incidents to support it. And in true Thomson style, not a single elecment is supported by even a grain of truth. Fantasy all the way.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #66 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool. Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function.
Back to top	IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #67 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:14pm progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm: lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool. It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers $770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38836 Gender:	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #68 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:23pm Quote: Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function. Link....or it did not happen.
Back to top	IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59054
Here
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #69 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:24pm

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm:

lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool.

It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers

$770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it

I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #70 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:26pm

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:24pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm:

lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool.

It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers

$770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it

I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well.

$700 + GST. seems rather round to me

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #71 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:26pm

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:23pm:

Quote:

Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function.

Link....or it did not happen.

Wink

wheres the copy of your law degree and admission to the bar lying lawyer-wannabe?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59054
Here
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #72 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:28pm

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:26pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:24pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm:

lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool.

It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers

$770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it

I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well.

$700 + GST. seems rather round to me

Is that for the $70 banquet for ten?

I hear its better than sex.

Back to top

IP Logged

mozzaok

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Stand by for more Thomson
Reply #73 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:28pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!

You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa.
Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

Actually smithy, isn't PYNE in charge of "business" in da house?
That sort of job could be right up his alley. (No direction implied)

Back to top

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38836 Gender:	Re: Stand by for more Thomson Reply #74 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:29pm My law degree is not in question. This is: Quote: Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function. Link, if you please.
Back to top	IP Logged