Australian Politics Forum - Why Craig Thomson's explanation makes sense

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96221
Gender: male

Re: Why Craig Thomson's explanation makes sense
Reply #75 - May 25^th, 2012 at 10:25am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

Thompson actually said that it was trial by Tony Abbott and the media. The DPP said there is no case to answer because of lack of credible evidence.

The producer of ACA admitted to Thompson that they are paying the prossie $60,000. Gutter journalism at its best or worst, whatever way you look at it.

I'd admit to it for $30,000. Come on TT, buy me.

Matty would admit to it for the publicity

Back to top

IP Logged

Ex Dame Pansi

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 24168

Re: Why Craig Thomson's explanation makes sense
Reply #76 - May 25^th, 2012 at 10:30am

Karnal wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:25am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

Thompson actually said that it was trial by Tony Abbott and the media. The DPP said there is no case to answer because of lack of credible evidence.

The producer of ACA admitted to Thompson that they are paying the prossie $60,000. Gutter journalism at its best or worst, whatever way you look at it.

I'd admit to it for $30,000. Come on TT, buy me.

Matty would admit to it for the publicity

Damn! I've been done over by matty.

Back to top

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58855
Here
Gender: male

Re: Why Craig Thomson's explanation makes sense
Reply #77 - May 25^th, 2012 at 2:02pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:30am:

Karnal wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:25am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

Thompson actually said that it was trial by Tony Abbott and the media. The DPP said there is no case to answer because of lack of credible evidence.

The producer of ACA admitted to Thompson that they are paying the prossie $60,000. Gutter journalism at its best or worst, whatever way you look at it.

I'd admit to it for $30,000. Come on TT, buy me.

Matty would admit to it for the publicity

Damn! I've been done over by matty.

They will roll out someone with a blurry face who looks a lot like Julie Bishop after she caught a bus.

Back to top

IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Why Craig Thomson's explanation makes sense Reply #78 - May 25^th, 2012 at 2:03pm Any old crack whore look alike will do..even Julie Bishop
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged