Australian Politics Forum - Who is to be blamed?

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Who is to be blamed?

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2

Who is to be blamed? (Read 974 times)

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 26247
Gender: male

Re: Who is to be blamed?
Reply #15 - May 25^th, 2012 at 1:58pm

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:56pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:50pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:49pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:42pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:33pm:

And now Abbott has committed a crime by suggesting that if Thomson resigns from parliament that the Libs will lay off him.
Abbott should get himself a good lawyer

Umm, what crime did he commit, Adumbcrow?

Its a crime to suggest such a thing..wait and see if Labor asks the Feds to investigate

How is it a crime? Please enlighten us all as to what crime Abbott has supposedly broken. Proof, please.

Dont take my word for it...listen to the news tonight

You're the one that raised this. Please, show us the proof.

Calm down..it will be on the news tonight
lve explained twice what he did that is a crime

Yeah, thought so. If you can't show us the proof, clearly it's all a figment of your imagination.

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Who is to be blamed?
Reply #16 - May 25^th, 2012 at 2:04pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:56pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:50pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:49pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:42pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:33pm:

And now Abbott has committed a crime by suggesting that if Thomson resigns from parliament that the Libs will lay off him.
Abbott should get himself a good lawyer

Umm, what crime did he commit, Adumbcrow?

Its a crime to suggest such a thing..wait and see if Labor asks the Feds to investigate

How is it a crime? Please enlighten us all as to what crime Abbott has supposedly broken. Proof, please.

Dont take my word for it...listen to the news tonight

You're the one that raised this. Please, show us the proof.

Calm down..it will be on the news tonight
lve explained twice what he did that is a crime

Yeah, thought so. If you can't show us the proof, clearly it's all a figment of your imagination.

Hold that thought when you are watching the news tonight

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Who is to be blamed?
Reply #17 - May 25^th, 2012 at 3:00pm

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:56pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:50pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:49pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:42pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:33pm:

And now Abbott has committed a crime by suggesting that if Thomson resigns from parliament that the Libs will lay off him.
Abbott should get himself a good lawyer

Umm, what crime did he commit, Adumbcrow?

Its a crime to suggest such a thing..wait and see if Labor asks the Feds to investigate

How is it a crime? Please enlighten us all as to what crime Abbott has supposedly broken. Proof, please.

Dont take my word for it...listen to the news tonight

You're the one that raised this. Please, show us the proof.

Calm down..it will be on the news tonight
lve explained twice what he did that is a crime

no its not and because of just one thing. PRESUMPTIONOF INNOCENCE which is now the parliamentary equivalent of 'bugger off I can do whatever I want'.

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 26247
Gender: male

Re: Who is to be blamed?
Reply #18 - May 25^th, 2012 at 3:02pm

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 2:04pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:56pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:50pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:49pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:42pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:33pm:

And now Abbott has committed a crime by suggesting that if Thomson resigns from parliament that the Libs will lay off him.
Abbott should get himself a good lawyer

Umm, what crime did he commit, Adumbcrow?

Its a crime to suggest such a thing..wait and see if Labor asks the Feds to investigate

How is it a crime? Please enlighten us all as to what crime Abbott has supposedly broken. Proof, please.

Dont take my word for it...listen to the news tonight

You're the one that raised this. Please, show us the proof.

Calm down..it will be on the news tonight
lve explained twice what he did that is a crime

Yeah, thought so. If you can't show us the proof, clearly it's all a figment of your imagination.

Hold that thought when you are watching the news tonight

Which segment will it be under, the weather?

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page