falah you'll have to forgive freediver, he can read, but his comprehension is extremely poor. Not the sharpest tool in the shed.

abu_rashid wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:42pm:


I shed no tears for either side.

Moslems deserve ISLAM!


Syria today, is an example of the intractable perfection of ISLAM.

Both sides of teh conflict in Syria know that Allah, is on their side.

And each is determined to prove to the world that ISLAM will be the victor.




And i am sure that ISLAM will be the victor.

After all, when your raison d’être is to produce dead bodies, ISLAM is sure to prove to the whole world that it can excel - in that regard.




The words of some moslem uber master, probably a Syrian. Either a Sunni, or an Alawite Syrian moslem uber master.



Dictionary;
Übermensch = = the ideal superior man of the future who could rise above conventional Christian morality to create and impose his own values, originally described by Nietzsche



+++

QUESTION;

Why won't moslems take responsibility for the conduct of their co-religionists, and take responsibility for the 'lawful' violence which ISLAM clearly encourages ?

Are moslems ashamed of the conduct of their co-religionists, and are moslems ashamed of the 'lawful' violence which ISLAM clearly encourages in the present Syrian conflict [between these two moslem factions] ?

One would find it difficult to believe so!




QUESTION;

Why won't Western journalists confront moslems [in this country, Australia] about the conduct of their co-religionists, in Syria?

And why won't Western journalists confront moslems [in this country, Australia] about the contents of ISLAM's foundation texts [i.e. Koran and Hadith] ?

When these ISLAMIC foundation texts which clearly obligates, and encourages and makes 'lawful', moslem warfare against Allah's enemies [i.e. Allah's enemies being those people who do not believe, as moslems believe] ?




COMMENT;
The present Syrian conflict [between these two moslem factions], is a good example of why moslems should not be permitted to be citizens of non-moslem nations.

i.e.






+++


ISLAM divides the world into two camps.

DIVISIONS OF THE WORLD, ACCORDING TO ISLAM,

Dar al-Islam = = the house of Islam, house of Peace [those places where Sharia has authority].
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam#Dar_al-Islam
.....like Syria!!!
/sarc off

Dar al-Harb = = "house of war", those countries where Sharia does not rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam#Dar_al-Harb



Harbi = = "one under a declaration of war", a non-moslem, WHO DOES NOT LIVE ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC LAW.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harbi

brumbie wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 8:44am:


The land of Israel.
Given to the Jews by God himself.

"Take this land in my name for I am the Lord"

Then you as a Muslim should not be in a white person country?
See how you don't like the argument the other side?

freediver wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 11:58am:


So why are they not saying coloured Muslims in England, France, Australia should all leave?
You know Mossad calls London "Londonistan"

brumbie wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 8:44am:


Where they lived thousands of years ago is Irrelevant.

My ancestors lived in Germany 2000 years ago, doesn't mean I have a right to go and boot German families from their homes and make it my own... does it?

abu_rashid wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 12:14pm:


What do you think should be done with Israeli Jews?

Quote:


Almost all Israeli Jews immigrated legally, just like the London Pakis.

I realise you have claimed before that this immigration was illegal, but you never came up with a solid explanation for why. It just evaporated into thin air after one or two simple questions.