Australian Politics Forum

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Mitt Romney Reply #15 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:42am Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am: And does he have a chance? Obama will win his second term. Yep. Regardless of what he's done (or hasn't done) in his term, his "minority majority" strategy can't be beat.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Mitt Romney
Reply #16 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:47am

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

Obama will win a 2nd IMO.

If Ron Paul was so popular why didn’t he win any (might have got a couple, can’t remember) primaries?

Santorum, Romney and can’t think of his name ex speaker dude??? all out polled Paul easily in most races, i thought?

He did win a few and they were in the states with a transparent, non electric voting system.
Anywhere an open count was held in front of a camera Ron Paul won by a huge margin.
Its fairly plain to see has a lot more support then the media is telling you.

Yeah but nah.

That all sounds a bit conspiratorial. He didn’t get the support to run; I’d say this is how most would see it. Just Like Santorum, Perry and…ah WTF’s his name ex speaker dude.

The Rep’s best bet was Christie.

I wouldn't chuck the idea out so fast. conspiracies happen. Look @ poor ole thomson.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Mitt Romney
Reply #17 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:48am

... wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:42am:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Yep. Regardless of what he's done (or hasn't done) in his term, his "minority majority" strategy can't be beat.

Whats that strategy?

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Mitt Romney
Reply #18 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:57pm

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

Obama will win a 2nd IMO.

If Ron Paul was so popular why didn’t he win any (might have got a couple, can’t remember) primaries?

Santorum, Romney and can’t think of his name ex speaker dude??? all out polled Paul easily in most races, i thought?

He did win a few and they were in the states with a transparent, non electric voting system.
Anywhere an open count was held in front of a camera Ron Paul won by a huge margin.
Its fairly plain to see has a lot more support then the media is telling you.

Yeah but nah.

That all sounds a bit conspiratorial. He didn’t get the support to run; I’d say this is how most would see it. Just Like Santorum, Perry and…ah WTF’s his name ex speaker dude.

The Rep’s best bet was Christie.

And what do you base that opinion on?
He does have the support to win because unlike for other people his delegates are loyal will not just fold and end up voting for Romney.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Mitt Romney
Reply #19 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 2:04pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:57pm:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

Obama will win a 2nd IMO.

If Ron Paul was so popular why didn’t he win any (might have got a couple, can’t remember) primaries?

Santorum, Romney and can’t think of his name ex speaker dude??? all out polled Paul easily in most races, i thought?

He did win a few and they were in the states with a transparent, non electric voting system.
Anywhere an open count was held in front of a camera Ron Paul won by a huge margin.
Its fairly plain to see has a lot more support then the media is telling you.

Yeah but nah.

That all sounds a bit conspiratorial. He didn’t get the support to run; I’d say this is how most would see it. Just Like Santorum, Perry and…ah WTF’s his name ex speaker dude.

The Rep’s best bet was Christie.

And what do you base that opinion on?
He does have the support to win because unlike for other people his delegates are loyal will not just fold and end up voting for Romney.

There’s much speculation about delegates being compelled to vote for the nomination and many think there could be a “revolution” of types and shift support to Paul. All to do with

Don’t get me wrong, i think Paul would be a good option for the Rep’s.

From an article….

Mitt Romney surpassed the 1,144 delegate count needed with his win in the Texas Primary last night. Now the remaining Primaries are just a formality before the Republican National Convention, August 27-30, 2012, in Tampa, FL.
But, what if the delegates are not bound to Romney or any candidate on the "first ballot" vote as the RNC keeps repeating and the media keeps parroting?
Who would the delegates vote for at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, if they knew that the RNC in 2008 put a rule into effect that clearly states that the delegates are not bound to any candidate regardless of State Party rules?
Would we see the Ron Paul revolution that many Paul delegates say we will?

The rule….
Rule number 38:
No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the unit rule.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rnc-delegates-not-bound-to-any-candidate-on-first-ballot

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Mitt Romney
Reply #20 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 3:53pm

Quote:

There’s much speculation about delegates being compelled to vote for the nomination and many think there could be a “revolution” of types and shift support to Paul. All to do with

Don’t get me wrong, i think Paul would be a good option for the Rep’s.

From an article….

Mitt Romney surpassed the 1,144 delegate count needed with his win in the Texas Primary last night. Now the remaining Primaries are just a formality before the Republican National Convention, August 27-30, 2012, in Tampa, FL.
But, what if the delegates are not bound to Romney or any candidate on the "first ballot" vote as the RNC keeps repeating and the media keeps parroting?
Who would the delegates vote for at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, if they knew that the RNC in 2008 put a rule into effect that clearly states that the delegates are not bound to any candidate regardless of State Party rules?
Would we see the Ron Paul revolution that many Paul delegates say we will?

The rule….
Rule number 38:
No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the unit rule.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rnc-delegates-not-bound-to-any-candidate-on-first-ballot

Its possible, which is a big step. Might not happen with Paul but he has set the path for others like him to come next election and so on. His son Rand Paul is well on the way and may even become Vice president under romney, bit of a sell out but it will be necessary to get the top job later on.
Paul is the only viable candidate out there, you cannot deny that Obama and Romney are just puppets.

I look forward to seeing what happens, not that there is much hope.
If you actually watch what is happening there tho, there is no doubt that Ron has close to a majority.
And not only that his followers and delegates are 100% loyal. Which is something we have not ever seen before.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Mitt Romney Reply #21 - Jun 1^st, 2012 at 6:49pm Mitt Romney is Related to Obama & Bush (One Bloodline Rules The World) Time Magazine: Ancestry.com Finds that Mitt Romney and George W. Bush Are Cousins http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/12/20/family-ties-ancestry-com-finds-that-romne...
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Mitt Romney Reply #22 - Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 3:09pm http://www.infowars.com/top-mitt-romney-donors-update/ Top Mitt Romney Donors: Update Then again, here is Obama: So on one hand Wall Street, and on the other Law Firms, the Government, and Academia – the four sides of the Status Quo square. America: the best place to legally purchase a president.
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: Mitt Romney Reply #23 - Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 3:19pm How the heck do they get that informaiton and when they do how do they know its right? SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Mitt Romney Reply #24 - Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 6:14pm its common knowledge all political donations must be disclosed (not all are disclosed however a fraction is disclosed on the books) as it were and so it is namaste
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged