Australian Politics Forum - 61% of voters want Turnbull.

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #60 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm

Maqqa wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:54pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:42pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 4:54pm:

They are both lies. You answer my question. What are you insinuating?

That they are somehow different?

SOB

You have not answered my original question

The assumption you made was the lies are the same in terms of severity - is this correct?

I dont see any "severity" there. They are both lies. Where does severity come into it?

What are you trying to make me say? That 1 of those lies is somehow "worse" than the other? Why?

SOB

Let me illustrate:

(1) No I didn't eat the Xmas pudding

(2) There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead

Both are lies - obviously the second one will have greater severity of impact on the Australia economy than the first lie.

But the lies in question were "children overboard" and "no carbon tax"

I dont remember any pollie talking about xmas pudding.

If a pollie did lie about xmas pudding though you can be sure it was to manipulate the public in some way though.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull. Reply #61 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:58pm I was going to use the example of a "white lie" but have refrained for fear of being called "a racist" by leftards
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #62 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:59pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:54pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 5:42pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 4:54pm:

They are both lies. You answer my question. What are you insinuating?

That they are somehow different?

SOB

You have not answered my original question

The assumption you made was the lies are the same in terms of severity - is this correct?

I dont see any "severity" there. They are both lies. Where does severity come into it?

What are you trying to make me say? That 1 of those lies is somehow "worse" than the other? Why?

SOB

Let me illustrate:

(1) No I didn't eat the Xmas pudding

(2) There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead

Both are lies - obviously the second one will have greater severity of impact on the Australia economy than the first lie.

But the lies in question were "children overboard" and "no carbon tax"

I dont remember any pollie talking about xmas pudding.

If a pollie did lie about xmas pudding though you can be sure it was to manipulate the public in some way though.

SOB

So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact?

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull. Reply #63 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm Quote: So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact? The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies. SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

GoddyofOz Gold Member Offline Vote 1 for Sex, cause you're gay if you don't Posts: 2397	Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull. Reply #64 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.
Back to top	"A Conservative is a man who just sits and thinks, mostly just sits." - Woodrow Wilson. True Patriotism is serving your country all the time, and serving your Politicians when they deserve it. IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #65 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:34pm

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.

why? because YOU say so? What possible insanity would cause the libs to risk a HUGE winning margin by changing the leader who is responsible for getting that lead?

Gillard onthe other hand is the reverse being the leader who LOST Rudds significant lead and now is so far behind that she is looking at eclipsing Whitlams loss.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

GoddyofOz

Gold Member

Offline

Vote 1 for Sex, cause
you're gay if you don't

Posts: 2397

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #66 - Jun 4^th, 2012 at 10:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.

why? because YOU say so? What possible insanity would cause the libs to risk a HUGE winning margin by changing the leader who is responsible for getting that lead?

Gillard onthe other hand is the reverse being the leader who LOST Rudds significant lead and now is so far behind that she is looking at eclipsing Whitlams loss.

Pull your head out of your arse; It was Gillard that gifted the Libs that lead, not Abbott.

You give him so much credit he doesn't deserve, you'll be massaging his feet the next time he has to bolt from Parliament at this rate.

Back to top

"A Conservative is a man who just sits and thinks, mostly just sits." - Woodrow Wilson.

True Patriotism is serving your country all the time, and serving your Politicians when they deserve it.

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull. Reply #67 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 6:40am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm: Quote: So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact? The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies. SOB WHY DO YOU ASK MAQQA? SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull. Reply #68 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:01am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm: Quote: So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact? The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies. SOB So you still won't answer the question Its a simple yes or no
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #69 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:03am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 6:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

Quote:

So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact?

The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies.

SOB

WHY DO YOU ASK MAQQA?

SOB

I ask because your posts attempts to lump all lies in the same basket which is not the way society works

Shows your lefties tail?

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #70 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:18am

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 10:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.

why? because YOU say so? What possible insanity would cause the libs to risk a HUGE winning margin by changing the leader who is responsible for getting that lead?

Gillard onthe other hand is the reverse being the leader who LOST Rudds significant lead and now is so far behind that she is looking at eclipsing Whitlams loss.

Pull your head out of your arse; It was Gillard that gifted the Libs that lead, not Abbott.

You give him so much credit he doesn't deserve, you'll be massaging his feet the next time he has to bolt from Parliament at this rate.

his two predecessors failed totally yet Abbott has succeeded. and BTW abbott took on Rudd and hammered him first. Gillard was just his second scalp.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #71 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:21am

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:18am:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 10:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.

why? because YOU say so? What possible insanity would cause the libs to risk a HUGE winning margin by changing the leader who is responsible for getting that lead?

Gillard onthe other hand is the reverse being the leader who LOST Rudds significant lead and now is so far behind that she is looking at eclipsing Whitlams loss.

Pull your head out of your arse; It was Gillard that gifted the Libs that lead, not Abbott.

You give him so much credit he doesn't deserve, you'll be massaging his feet the next time he has to bolt from Parliament at this rate.

his two predecessors failed totally yet Abbott has succeeded. and BTW abbott took on Rudd and hammered him first. Gillard was just his second scalp.

The word is B1ATCH

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #72 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am

Maqqa wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:21am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:18am:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 10:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

What the f*ck have I been saying since the end of last year? Both Gillard and Abbott have to go.

why? because YOU say so? What possible insanity would cause the libs to risk a HUGE winning margin by changing the leader who is responsible for getting that lead?

Gillard onthe other hand is the reverse being the leader who LOST Rudds significant lead and now is so far behind that she is looking at eclipsing Whitlams loss.

Pull your head out of your arse; It was Gillard that gifted the Libs that lead, not Abbott.

You give him so much credit he doesn't deserve, you'll be massaging his feet the next time he has to bolt from Parliament at this rate.

his two predecessors failed totally yet Abbott has succeeded. and BTW abbott took on Rudd and hammered him first. Gillard was just his second scalp.

The word is B1ATCH

true... polling far worse than Whitlam is hardly an acheivement to be proud of esp while the opposition is polling close to record highs.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: 61% of voters want Turnbull.
Reply #73 - Jun 5^th, 2012 at 9:38am

Maqqa wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 7:01am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

Quote:

So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact?

The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies.

SOB

So you still won't answer the question

Its a simple yes or no

Its answered right there

SOB