Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 10:51am:

Heh maybe but i get the feeling what you mean is what i have heard a lot of racists say "everyone is racist" because they cant imagine that anyone else is different from themselves. These ppl deserve pity in a way though because they obviously cant help it. Its not a choice with them - they just cant bear anyone different from themselves.

SOB

When you look at two people of different races, race is not the only thing that is different in the vast majority of cases. Most people discern these other, non-biological differences (tintedness, nose shape etc).
And after a few encounters they realise that there is an unmistakable pattern. And so from then on, it becomes a matter of statistical patter-recognition, if you like.

A bit like the climate, 'racism'. This used to be a European country but parts of Sydney look like an Asian or Middle Eastern place, just as London looks like a European city only architecturally, not demographically. demographically it is a Nigerian-Paki city.

We are having a very obvious demographic 'climate change' in Australia - and the UK, Scandinavia, Western Europe, North America.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 2:01pm:



I said liberals, not Liberals.

Quote:


Quote:



Do you think, say, Robert Mugabe thinks there's no such thing as race?  What about Yoshihiko Noda?  Hugo Chavez?  No - they're all proud of their ancestry and heritage,a nd are happy to enjoy distinctions between the culture and accomplishments of their own people, and the culture and accompolihsments of others.  As I said - the range of reality-defying beliefs that fall under the banner of cultural marxism are held almost exclusively by whites in 1st world nations....or non-whites in those nations who seek to exploit our stupidity, though they can't really be said to "believe" but rather just use the sit uatio to their advantage. 

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 2:20pm:



I disagree, for the simple reason that generally, people prefer the company of their own people.  liberals try to deny this, but again - they are insignificant in the scheme of things - More so when you consider they don't reproduce at anything approaching replacement levels.  In a display of the marvels of evolution, they are headed for extinction.

Quote:



No need to kill anyone on such a basis.  If we all agreed theres room enough on this earth for everyone, it wouldn't come to that.  However, when you force incompatible cultures to inhabit the same space, conflict is inevitable.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 3:03pm:



What makes you so sure? 
And if you are correct - so what?  the net result is the same.

Soren wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 1:56pm:


It really is marvellous, isn't it? Take Bradford. Only a few years ago it was full of snow-white washerwomen and football hooligans - terrible people. Most backward. Not a tan in the place.

Now Bradford is leading the way. It really is the model of a civilized, multicultural melting pot. People of different shades and nose shapes happily coexist side by side. Whoever would have thought?

Now I'm not usually one to blow my own trumpet as it were, but I do think that the Faculty of Pakistani Studies has played an influential role in this transformation. We've helped to shape the statistical patter-recognition in our own small way, and we have, I believe, been largely successful.

It's a credit to our marvellous team, of course. Yes, the architecture has helped, but I also put it down to the tintedness and nose shape of the great people of Bradford.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 3:23pm:


Small numbers are mixing up, but not enough to make any meaningful demographic shift. The vast majority prefer their own - It hasn't changed in the last 100,000 years, and it's not going to change in the next 100,000 years.