Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print
Gillard did very well, on Q&A (Read 9966 times)
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #105 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:15pm
 
mozzaok wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 11:32am:
matty wrote on Jun 12th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 12th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
matty wrote on Jun 12th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
Look at the carbon tax, for just one example of Labor's communism. Why take from the rich and middle, to give to the working, poor and dole bludgers?



You do not even try to understand issues, yet come on here & try engage in political debate.
The Carbon tax is not a personal income tax, it a company tax FFS.
Its not taking from the "Rich,middle or for that matter low income earners"

And before you type your uninformed bile remember Tony wishes to tax business so poor, middle & rich can have Kids.
Communism & social engineering all in 1
Why won't his tax flow on
Why when his tax nets a hell of a lot more companies than 500 won't it close people down.

If I actually thought you were for real & not some wanker personality of a lonely person whose only friend is a keyboard I would be truly frightened


A company tax? It is all going to flow through, and only those on lower incomes, and dole bludgers, are going to be compensated. I would try engaging in some actual debate with you, but why should I even bother when you post such rude and vile remarks?


WHY would Smithy be expected to ever engage YOU(matty) in INTELLIGENT debate,

He would not want to be guilty of defeating an unarmed opponent.


So says a Green voter.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #106 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:27pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 5:58pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 4:32pm:
Geez lolly! Can't even answer a simple question now?

I have already stated the years and the lag. Go look.

You can even look at the graph yourself. After all, you supplied it. After you look at it, ask yourself what year did the PS start. What year did we drop sharply and what year did the OECD start to drop sharper. If you cant see, take the labor glasses off because you are starting to sound like green_loser.

Longw is right though. The graph is not about boats floating around the oceans.


Oh. You could say "2001" or "2003" or whatever but no, you send me a long post telling me to look it up. Meaning you've got no idea and are just making it up.

Why does that not surprise me?  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #107 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm
 
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #108 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #109 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:35pm
 
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?


I am not a big fan of Tony Jones, but that was a pretty harsh and unnecessary remark.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #110 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:38pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:35pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?


I am not a big fan of Tony Jones, but that was a pretty harsh and unnecessary remark.


I think Tony Jones is quite straight. And in any case, Abbott would have to actually appear on QandA for Tony Jones to ask him any kind of question, fawning or not.

No, I meant Alan Jones.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #111 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm
 
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:38pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:35pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?


I am not a big fan of Tony Jones, but that was a pretty harsh and unnecessary remark.


I think Tony Jones is quite straight. And in any case, Abbott would have to actually appear on QandA for Tony Jones to ask him any kind of question, fawning or not.

No, I meant Alan Jones.


Well yes, I did know who you meant, and your comment was appalling and disgusting.

At any rate, why should he appear, when it's so Labor/Green stacked?
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74836
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #112 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


not sure how you come to that conclusion, most episodes i've seen ( and i try to see them all) have a higher % of lib supporters in the audience than they do ALP .... you don't like the question why don't you ask your own ....
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74836
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #113 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:43pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:38pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:35pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?


I am not a big fan of Tony Jones, but that was a pretty harsh and unnecessary remark.


I think Tony Jones is quite straight. And in any case, Abbott would have to actually appear on QandA for Tony Jones to ask him any kind of question, fawning or not.

No, I meant Alan Jones.


Well yes, I did know who you meant, and your comment was appalling and disgusting.

At any rate, why should he appear, when it's so Labor/Green stacked?


why is it appalling? it's true
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #114 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:46pm
 
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm:
At any rate, why should he appear, when it's so Labor/Green stacked?


Why can't your leader appear before a hostile audience? No balls? No brains? Both of the above is my guess.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #115 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:48pm
 
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:27pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 5:58pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 4:32pm:
Geez lolly! Can't even answer a simple question now?

I have already stated the years and the lag. Go look.

You can even look at the graph yourself. After all, you supplied it. After you look at it, ask yourself what year did the PS start. What year did we drop sharply and what year did the OECD start to drop sharper. If you cant see, take the labor glasses off because you are starting to sound like green_loser.

Longw is right though. The graph is not about boats floating around the oceans.


Oh. You could say "2001" or "2003" or whatever but no, you send me a long post telling me to look it up. Meaning you've got no idea and are just making it up.

Why does that not surprise me?  Roll Eyes

I have already stated the information that the graph is showing. The graph, not me, the graph. Remember that. The graph, say it slowly, the graph.


You are pretty dumb to provide a graph and then cant even understand the points on the graph.
You had best go play with the kids in kindie.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #116 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:51pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:48pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:27pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 5:58pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 4:32pm:
Geez lolly! Can't even answer a simple question now?

I have already stated the years and the lag. Go look.

You can even look at the graph yourself. After all, you supplied it. After you look at it, ask yourself what year did the PS start. What year did we drop sharply and what year did the OECD start to drop sharper. If you cant see, take the labor glasses off because you are starting to sound like green_loser.

Longw is right though. The graph is not about boats floating around the oceans.


Oh. You could say "2001" or "2003" or whatever but no, you send me a long post telling me to look it up. Meaning you've got no idea and are just making it up.

Why does that not surprise me?  Roll Eyes

Already stated. You are pretty dumb to provide a graph and cant even understand the points on the graph. Best go play with the kinddies.


Grin Grin Grin

And you're so smart you can't even nominate a year on the graph?? Wow! Has someone been sucking out your brains again lolly??  I think you got stupider all of a sudden!  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #117 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:51pm
 
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:51pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:48pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:27pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 5:58pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 13th, 2012 at 4:32pm:
Geez lolly! Can't even answer a simple question now?

I have already stated the years and the lag. Go look.

You can even look at the graph yourself. After all, you supplied it. After you look at it, ask yourself what year did the PS start. What year did we drop sharply and what year did the OECD start to drop sharper. If you cant see, take the labor glasses off because you are starting to sound like green_loser.

Longw is right though. The graph is not about boats floating around the oceans.


Oh. You could say "2001" or "2003" or whatever but no, you send me a long post telling me to look it up. Meaning you've got no idea and are just making it up.

Why does that not surprise me?  Roll Eyes

Already stated. You are pretty dumb to provide a graph and cant even understand the points on the graph. Best go play with the kinddies.


Grin Grin Grin

And you're so smart you can't even nominate a year?? Wow! Has someone been sucking out your brains again lolly??  I think you got stupider all of a sudden!  Grin Grin Grin Grin

Already nominated.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #118 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:53pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


not sure how you come to that conclusion, most episodes i've seen ( and i try to see them all) have a higher % of lib supporters in the audience than they do ALP .... you don't like the question why don't you ask your own ....


The questions are stacked and screened.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Gillard did very well, on Q&A
Reply #119 - Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:54pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:43pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:42pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:38pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:35pm:
Gist wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:34pm:
matty wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 8:32pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Jun 14th, 2012 at 1:05am:
The very fact Gillard had the guts to show up and Abbott didn't pretty much says it all at this point, and I'm no fan of Gillards.


I can't blame him, seeing how stacked the Q & A crowd is.


Yes, quite right. Can't have him being asked questions by anyone other than fawning faggots like Jones can we?


I am not a big fan of Tony Jones, but that was a pretty harsh and unnecessary remark.


I think Tony Jones is quite straight. And in any case, Abbott would have to actually appear on QandA for Tony Jones to ask him any kind of question, fawning or not.

No, I meant Alan Jones.


Well yes, I did know who you meant, and your comment was appalling and disgusting.

At any rate, why should he appear, when it's so Labor/Green stacked?


why is it appalling? it's true


"Fawning faggot"? How?
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print