Australian Politics Forum - Labor's Productivity diarrhea

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:51am

On 24th April 2007 - the then leader Kevin Rudd TALKED
about his 10 point productivity plan launched as New Directions for Innovation, Competitiveness and Productivity

20th April 2008 at the 20/20 TALK
Summit the then Industrial Relation Minister (one J Gillard) Chaired which Working Group?

You guessed it - the Productivity Working Group

14th June 2012 - the now Prime Minister (J Gillard) TALKED
behind closed doors with businesses about? You guessed it - productivity.

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75089
Gender: male

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #1 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:55am

what exactly is your point? Productivity has been on the decline since Howards early years ... declining rapidly after workchoices ... the alp has at least managed to slow that rate of decline to levels that the libs could never reach .... they will keep working on productivity for the next 20 yrs ... you have a problem with this why exactly?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

bobbythefap1 Gold Member Offline Posts: 7026 Listen now to the rain	Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea Reply #2 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:56am Don't you realise that when you attack labor you are essentially attacking the libs as well??
Back to top	A day without sunshine is like night. IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #3 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:55am:

what exactly is your point? Productivity has been on the decline since Howards early years ... declining rapidly after workchoices ... the alp has at least managed to slow that rate of decline to levels that the libs could never reach .... they will keep working on productivity for the next 20 yrs ... you have a problem with this why exactly?

you've got some stats for this

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

corporate_whitey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 8896 Archivist	Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea Reply #4 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am The word productivity should be taken out of the vernacular, it is only ever about making workers work harder, work longer, work for less money, work for less entitlements, work for less legal protections and work for less security so the wealth can be taken and redistributed to corporate welfare and the Mafia.
Back to top	World Wide Working Class Struggle IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75089
Gender: male

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #5 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:01am

Maqqa wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:55am:

what exactly is your point? Productivity has been on the decline since Howards early years ... declining rapidly after workchoices ... the alp has at least managed to slow that rate of decline to levels that the libs could never reach .... they will keep working on productivity for the next 20 yrs ... you have a problem with this why exactly?

you've got some stats for this

read it and weap
http://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2011/eslake.pdf

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

corporate_whitey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 8896 Archivist	Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea Reply #6 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:07am There should be legislation to prevent boosting productivity through claw-back from workers, that is outright theft.
Back to top	World Wide Working Class Struggle IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75089
Gender: male

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #7 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:13am

corporate_whitey wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:07am:

There should be legislation to prevent boosting productivity through claw-back from workers, that is outright theft.

The funny thing is that workchoices, Howards big boost to the employers, actually saw the rate of decline in productivity jump ..... bosses were screwing workers so the workers screwed them back ....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #8 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:17am

corporate_whitey wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am:

The word productivity should be taken out of the vernacular, it is only ever about making workers work harder, work longer, work for less money, work for less entitlements, work for less legal protections and work for less security so the wealth can be taken and redistributed to corporate welfare and the Mafia.

The whole idea with productivity is to:

(1) Reduce unemployment - which the LIBs did during the Howard years and the ALP inherited in 2007

(2) Increase the output of the current workforce.

It is the second point that I want start the discussion

Increasing output essentially means to increase the GDP - which the LIBs double during the Howard years

The workforce is where Labor loves to launch it's attack and use the old "Workchoices" war cry.

The scenario that CW has outlined would happen if unemployment was high. But unemployment is low and we have a mining sector that cries out for more labour supplies.

The miners are paying workers an obscene amount of money work. Train drivers are earning double in WA than they would in any other states. They can do this because each unit of production has a high productivity worth

So how do we equalise this?

Do we equalise this by paying everyone else who's not in the mining industry higher wages? Does that mean we will increase productivity? What will that do to costs and inflation?

Do we add another layer of costs to the miners and large companies (carbon tax and the Minerals resources tax) so they have less money to pay their workers? If they can't attract the workers then their productivity goes down. So how does that help the economy?

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75089
Gender: male

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #9 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:19am

Maqqa wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:17am:

corporate_whitey wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am:

The word productivity should be taken out of the vernacular, it is only ever about making workers work harder, work longer, work for less money, work for less entitlements, work for less legal protections and work for less security so the wealth can be taken and redistributed to corporate welfare and the Mafia.

The whole idea with productivity is to:

(1) Reduce unemployment - which the LIBs did during the Howard years and the ALP inherited in 2007

(2) Increase the output of the current workforce.

It is the second point that I want start the discussion

Increasing output essentially means to increase the GDP - which the LIBs double during the Howard years

The workforce is where Labor loves to launch it's attack and use the old "Workchoices" war cry.

The scenario that CW has outlined would happen if unemployment was high. But unemployment is low and we have a mining sector that cries out for more labour supplies.

The miners are paying workers an obscene amount of money work. Train drivers are earning double in WA than they would in any other states. They can do this because each unit of production has a high productivity worth

So how do we equalise this?

Do we equalise this by paying everyone else who's not in the mining industry higher wages? Does that mean we will increase productivity? What will that do to costs and inflation?

Do we add another layer of costs to the miners and large companies (carbon tax and the Minerals resources tax) so they have less money to pay their workers? If they can't attract the workers then their productivity goes down. So how does that help the economy?

then you should have started there ... scrambling a little now aren't you forrest?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #10 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:21am

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:17am:

corporate_whitey wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am:

The word productivity should be taken out of the vernacular, it is only ever about making workers work harder, work longer, work for less money, work for less entitlements, work for less legal protections and work for less security so the wealth can be taken and redistributed to corporate welfare and the Mafia.

The whole idea with productivity is to:

(1) Reduce unemployment - which the LIBs did during the Howard years and the ALP inherited in 2007

(2) Increase the output of the current workforce.

It is the second point that I want start the discussion

Increasing output essentially means to increase the GDP - which the LIBs double during the Howard years

The workforce is where Labor loves to launch it's attack and use the old "Workchoices" war cry.

The scenario that CW has outlined would happen if unemployment was high. But unemployment is low and we have a mining sector that cries out for more labour supplies.

The miners are paying workers an obscene amount of money work. Train drivers are earning double in WA than they would in any other states. They can do this because each unit of production has a high productivity worth

So how do we equalise this?

Do we equalise this by paying everyone else who's not in the mining industry higher wages? Does that mean we will increase productivity? What will that do to costs and inflation?

Do we add another layer of costs to the miners and large companies (carbon tax and the Minerals resources tax) so they have less money to pay their workers? If they can't attract the workers then their productivity goes down. So how does that help the economy?

then you should have started there ... scrambling a little now aren't you forrest?

It's just another dig at this incompetent Labor government. And you still don't have anything to offer JS

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75089
Gender: male

Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea
Reply #11 - Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:26am

Maqqa wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 10:17am:

corporate_whitey wrote on Jun 15^th, 2012 at 9:58am:

The word productivity should be taken out of the vernacular, it is only ever about making workers work harder, work longer, work for less money, work for less entitlements, work for less legal protections and work for less security so the wealth can be taken and redistributed to corporate welfare and the Mafia.

The whole idea with productivity is to:

(1) Reduce unemployment - which the LIBs did during the Howard years and the ALP inherited in 2007

(2) Increase the output of the current workforce.

It is the second point that I want start the discussion

Increasing output essentially means to increase the GDP - which the LIBs double during the Howard years

The workforce is where Labor loves to launch it's attack and use the old "Workchoices" war cry.

The scenario that CW has outlined would happen if unemployment was high. But unemployment is low and we have a mining sector that cries out for more labour supplies.

The miners are paying workers an obscene amount of money work. Train drivers are earning double in WA than they would in any other states. They can do this because each unit of production has a high productivity worth

So how do we equalise this?

Do we equalise this by paying everyone else who's not in the mining industry higher wages? Does that mean we will increase productivity? What will that do to costs and inflation?

Do we add another layer of costs to the miners and large companies (carbon tax and the Minerals resources tax) so they have less money to pay their workers? If they can't attract the workers then their productivity goes down. So how does that help the economy?

then you should have started there ... scrambling a little now aren't you forrest?

It's just another dig at this incompetent Labor government. And you still don't have anything to offer JS

I gave you a link that shows the stats , you've ignored it because it shows that you were wrong ... I've still no idea what your aticle that you copy pasted was trying to prove ? other than to relieve your bordom ... and now your trying to twist it into something it isn't .. if you wanted to talk about equalising productivity acvross the economy, why didn't you start the thread on that instead of the crap you put up ...

run forrest run ....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Labor's Productivity diarrhea Reply #12 - Jun 19^th, 2012 at 6:09pm yes because productivity is a sole function of John Howard and govt. ever think about unions? about state govts or other factors? simplistic git.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged