We see this week Assange ran to the nearest Embassy to claim asylum. I am sure he's not the first one to claim asylum
Lefties - especially the Greens are perpetuating that there is no such thing as a queue of asylum seekers.
By denying such things they are also denying the FACT that you can apply for asylum at ANY Embassy around the world.
Any TRUE asylum seeker would be running to the nearest Embassy - just like Assange - to claim asylum. Here is a list of Embassies in Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://embassy.goabroad.com/embassies-in/afghanistanhttp://embassy.goabroad.com/embassies-in/iraqInstead you see these so called asylum seekers country shop. They get on planes to go to Indonesia, destroy their documents and pretend to asylum seekrs aka Capt Emad
Looking at the definition a queue is
- a file or line, especially of people waiting their turn
- to form in a line while waiting
Their argument focus on one aspect of the definition of a queue ie you need to PHYSICALLY be in the line. Yes there are certain entertainment events requires you to be physically in the queue and yes if at the cricket and you are not in the queue then you'll never get to have a p1ss. But this is not what we are talking about are we?
The smarter lefties understand that physical presence is not always needed to form a queue or a line. But these ones are too cowardly to speak up against their brethrens.
When you submit a form to the ATO - it goes into a queue waiting to be processed.
When you commit a crime - you are also placed in a queue to attend court
So back to Assange - is he a queue jumper?