Australian Politics Forum - Ashby claims backfire against the Government

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #30 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:22pm

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:15pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:07pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

Can you link me to those please matty? I never saw them.

SOB

January 14: Applicant drove to Slipper's home to take him to meet some of his constituents. They stop at a local coffee shop.

Slipper: "Have you ever front bottom in a guy's a*** before".

Ashby: "That's not the kind of question you ask people, Peter".

Some weeks later ---

Slipper: Twinks or Bears - what are you into?

"The applicant recognised the question as relating to the types of gay sexual partners and was uncomfortable, replying to the questions 'They are not questions you ask'."

Text messages on Feburary 1 and 2: The Sunshine Coast Daily was wanting to interview Slipper on his use of social media.

Ashby texts Slipper at 5.44pm: "DO NOT DO THE SOCIAL MEDIA INTERVIEW WITH CATHY. They are digging for a new angle. It will not be good!!!! The questions are laced with double meaning. It's like answering the 'do i look fat' question. There's not (sic) right answer. The daily do not like u! U do not like them! I do not like them! Do not help them sell papers!".

After finding out Slipper had done the interview he text him at 6.10pm: "You're not funny! I cannot believe you called her! We'll have to clean this mess up now !! f**k f**k f**k".

7.06pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Relax my friend! x".

Ashby replies at 7.07pm: "It's so very hard to when u care about the bloke they keep f**king over. I hope like hell they don't f**k u over with this report".

7.19pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Xxx".

9.38pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

10pm - Slipper again texts: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

A text exchange then took place --

Ashby: "Haha where's Tim tonight?"

Slipper: "Missing".

Ashby: "Gone to pick up lol".

Slipper: "Do you think Timbo is closer to me than you?"

Ashby: 'Yeah but that's to be expected. He's known u longer. That sort of stuff doesn't worry me".

Slipper: "Gone to prick (sic) up to whom? And closer to you than pete?"

Ashby: "No he's closer to you. I hardly know him".

Ashby: "A random root lol!"

Ashby: "I've gotta stop being rude to my friends. Text u when I leave".

Slipper: "U getting roks off. Pity".

Slipper: "If you interested we could be closer?"

Slipper: "?"

Ashby: "I think we're good already. I'm happy seeing Tim being closest. I hate stepping on toes".

Slipper: ":"

Slipper: "Your call if u want to keep degrees of seperatation. No toes".

Slipper: "I told him positrion (sic) open".

Slipper: "But you're call and no hard feelings in that you only want businesslike contact. In that event of the difficulty in our personla".

Ashby: "I don't know what type of contact you expect Peter. Perhaps u should define that u would like and I can then be clearer on my position".

Slipper: "U want something more? U brillianmt (sic) at massages".

Ashby: "No I'm happy the way things are. I care for u Pete but the massage is at far as it goes. Life's a lot more simpler when it's business and a few drinks after work".

Slipper: "Oh".

Slipper: "No problems and thanks for (unclear)".

Ashby: "All good".

Slipper: "Sorry things not working out but appreciate your frankness. In future in circumstances please arrange all communcoations (sic)".

Slipper: "Thu tim as cannot guarantee availiability. Soo u missing syd harbour creises (sic: cruises)".

Ashby: "Am I missing it now?"

Slipper: "Suspect if you miss"

Slipper: "If you miss ok. Tim has girlfrien abd".

Slipper: "And pete needs to sort ou".

Slipper: "ok your call. Sorry? You still happy to ? come to can ? if not can cover".

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/this-is-an-extract-of-allegations-against-pet...

Yep. That sounds like a situation where a woman would be under duress.

Slipper is in a lot of poo.

Thank goodness she found the strength to tell someone about this man slipper.

Back to top

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #31 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:24pm

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:22pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:15pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:07pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

Can you link me to those please matty? I never saw them.

SOB

January 14: Applicant drove to Slipper's home to take him to meet some of his constituents. They stop at a local coffee shop.

Slipper: "Have you ever front bottom in a guy's a*** before".

Ashby: "That's not the kind of question you ask people, Peter".

Some weeks later ---

Slipper: Twinks or Bears - what are you into?

"The applicant recognised the question as relating to the types of gay sexual partners and was uncomfortable, replying to the questions 'They are not questions you ask'."

Text messages on Feburary 1 and 2: The Sunshine Coast Daily was wanting to interview Slipper on his use of social media.

Ashby texts Slipper at 5.44pm: "DO NOT DO THE SOCIAL MEDIA INTERVIEW WITH CATHY. They are digging for a new angle. It will not be good!!!! The questions are laced with double meaning. It's like answering the 'do i look fat' question. There's not (sic) right answer. The daily do not like u! U do not like them! I do not like them! Do not help them sell papers!".

After finding out Slipper had done the interview he text him at 6.10pm: "You're not funny! I cannot believe you called her! We'll have to clean this mess up now !! f**k f**k f**k".

7.06pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Relax my friend! x".

Ashby replies at 7.07pm: "It's so very hard to when u care about the bloke they keep f**king over. I hope like hell they don't f**k u over with this report".

7.19pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Xxx".

9.38pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

10pm - Slipper again texts: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

A text exchange then took place --

Ashby: "Haha where's Tim tonight?"

Slipper: "Missing".

Ashby: "Gone to pick up lol".

Slipper: "Do you think Timbo is closer to me than you?"

Ashby: 'Yeah but that's to be expected. He's known u longer. That sort of stuff doesn't worry me".

Slipper: "Gone to prick (sic) up to whom? And closer to you than pete?"

Ashby: "No he's closer to you. I hardly know him".

Ashby: "A random root lol!"

Ashby: "I've gotta stop being rude to my friends. Text u when I leave".

Slipper: "U getting roks off. Pity".

Slipper: "If you interested we could be closer?"

Slipper: "?"

Ashby: "I think we're good already. I'm happy seeing Tim being closest. I hate stepping on toes".

Slipper: ":"

Slipper: "Your call if u want to keep degrees of seperatation. No toes".

Slipper: "I told him positrion (sic) open".

Slipper: "But you're call and no hard feelings in that you only want businesslike contact. In that event of the difficulty in our personla".

Ashby: "I don't know what type of contact you expect Peter. Perhaps u should define that u would like and I can then be clearer on my position".

Slipper: "U want something more? U brillianmt (sic) at massages".

Ashby: "No I'm happy the way things are. I care for u Pete but the massage is at far as it goes. Life's a lot more simpler when it's business and a few drinks after work".

Slipper: "Oh".

Slipper: "No problems and thanks for (unclear)".

Ashby: "All good".

Slipper: "Sorry things not working out but appreciate your frankness. In future in circumstances please arrange all communcoations (sic)".

Slipper: "Thu tim as cannot guarantee availiability. Soo u missing syd harbour creises (sic: cruises)".

Ashby: "Am I missing it now?"

Slipper: "Suspect if you miss"

Slipper: "If you miss ok. Tim has girlfrien abd".

Slipper: "And pete needs to sort ou".

Slipper: "ok your call. Sorry? You still happy to ? come to can ? if not can cover".

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/this-is-an-extract-of-allegations-against-pet...

Yep. That sounds like a situation where a woman would be under duress.

Slipper is in a lot of poo.

Thank goodness she found the strength to tell someone about this man slipper.

It sounds like the man love was mutual..how is this harassment?

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

Shane B Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1473 Canberra Gender:	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #32 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:26pm Ashby had to make it clear, twice, that he wasn't interested.
Back to top	Julia Gillard - twice selected, never elected. We're still paying for the Whitlam Government. IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #33 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:27pm Shane B wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:26pm: Ashby had to make it clear, twice, that he wasn't interested. The texts he sent Slipper made it clear he was up for some man love..
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #34 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:28pm

adelcrow wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:24pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:22pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:15pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:07pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

Can you link me to those please matty? I never saw them.

SOB

January 14: Applicant drove to Slipper's home to take him to meet some of his constituents. They stop at a local coffee shop.

Slipper: "Have you ever front bottom in a guy's a*** before".

Ashby: "That's not the kind of question you ask people, Peter".

Some weeks later ---

Slipper: Twinks or Bears - what are you into?

"The applicant recognised the question as relating to the types of gay sexual partners and was uncomfortable, replying to the questions 'They are not questions you ask'."

Text messages on Feburary 1 and 2: The Sunshine Coast Daily was wanting to interview Slipper on his use of social media.

Ashby texts Slipper at 5.44pm: "DO NOT DO THE SOCIAL MEDIA INTERVIEW WITH CATHY. They are digging for a new angle. It will not be good!!!! The questions are laced with double meaning. It's like answering the 'do i look fat' question. There's not (sic) right answer. The daily do not like u! U do not like them! I do not like them! Do not help them sell papers!".

After finding out Slipper had done the interview he text him at 6.10pm: "You're not funny! I cannot believe you called her! We'll have to clean this mess up now !! f**k f**k f**k".

7.06pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Relax my friend! x".

Ashby replies at 7.07pm: "It's so very hard to when u care about the bloke they keep f**king over. I hope like hell they don't f**k u over with this report".

7.19pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Xxx".

9.38pm - Slipper texts Ashby: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

10pm - Slipper again texts: "Would be good if you here but perhaps we are not close enough?".

A text exchange then took place --

Ashby: "Haha where's Tim tonight?"

Slipper: "Missing".

Ashby: "Gone to pick up lol".

Slipper: "Do you think Timbo is closer to me than you?"

Ashby: 'Yeah but that's to be expected. He's known u longer. That sort of stuff doesn't worry me".

Slipper: "Gone to prick (sic) up to whom? And closer to you than pete?"

Ashby: "No he's closer to you. I hardly know him".

Ashby: "A random root lol!"

Ashby: "I've gotta stop being rude to my friends. Text u when I leave".

Slipper: "U getting roks off. Pity".

Slipper: "If you interested we could be closer?"

Slipper: "?"

Ashby: "I think we're good already. I'm happy seeing Tim being closest. I hate stepping on toes".

Slipper: ":"

Slipper: "Your call if u want to keep degrees of seperatation. No toes".

Slipper: "I told him positrion (sic) open".

Slipper: "But you're call and no hard feelings in that you only want businesslike contact. In that event of the difficulty in our personla".

Ashby: "I don't know what type of contact you expect Peter. Perhaps u should define that u would like and I can then be clearer on my position".

Slipper: "U want something more? U brillianmt (sic) at massages".

Ashby: "No I'm happy the way things are. I care for u Pete but the massage is at far as it goes. Life's a lot more simpler when it's business and a few drinks after work".

Slipper: "Oh".

Slipper: "No problems and thanks for (unclear)".

Ashby: "All good".

Slipper: "Sorry things not working out but appreciate your frankness. In future in circumstances please arrange all communcoations (sic)".

Slipper: "Thu tim as cannot guarantee availiability. Soo u missing syd harbour creises (sic: cruises)".

Ashby: "Am I missing it now?"

Slipper: "Suspect if you miss"

Slipper: "If you miss ok. Tim has girlfrien abd".

Slipper: "And pete needs to sort ou".

Slipper: "ok your call. Sorry? You still happy to ? come to can ? if not can cover".

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/this-is-an-extract-of-allegations-against-pet...

Yep. That sounds like a situation where a woman would be under duress.

Slipper is in a lot of poo.

Thank goodness she found the strength to tell someone about this man slipper.

It sounds like the man love was mutual..how is this harassment?

A person in power. A person powerless. That is all that is needed. Slipper should have known better and if he was under a rock and didn't know, thats too bad.

It is clear there was no reciprocation from Ashby, but after time may have felt sufficiently intimidated and played along.

Thats when it was a brave thing for Ashby to seek help from fellow trusted work colleagues, who agreed to help him and not make it a well known issue because of fear of losing his job.

Slipper is in the poo.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96020 Gender:	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #35 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:29pm Shane B wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:26pm: Ashby had to make it clear, twice, that he wasn't interested. True, Shane B, but you have to use a code word.
Back to top	IP Logged

Gist Gold Member Offline I am not a sock, I am a human being! Posts: 5476	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #36 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:31pm progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:28pm: Slipper is in the poo. Oh yeah... after all he's the one who is being investigated for possible criminal charges. Oh, no, wait...
Back to top	"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration) IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #37 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:34pm It look likes Ashby is concerned that he will go to prison if he releases copies of Slippers diary that he pinched...I wonder why that is?
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged

Dsmithy70

Gold Member

Offline

ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #38 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:34pm

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:46pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:16pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:06pm:

Gist wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

What's to defend matty and why would anyone be interested in doing that? In fact, why are you interested? Do you think Slipper may want to suck your righty dick?

Beacuse I am merely stating that the texts are sexually suggestive, there's no getting around that. Also, I've been told that Slipper's homosexuality has more or less been an open secret among many in the LNP (or at least the QLD branch).

I don't know if Slipper wants to do that, but it appears that you do.

Slipper should know better than to get sexual with an employee. The poor employee would think that the all powerful boss would sack him if he didn't play along with the boss to some degree.

Once it got too much for the poor employee (feeling sufficiently intimidated and sickened), he then asks for advise from his work colleagues, who he has a natural trust toward and they start to help, in silence.

There is nothing untoward about that scenario and that is why it will be fun to watch yet more labor lampooning.

You play Ashby as the victim, as is your political leanings.
As I have none other then a sense of social justice, I can see that Mr Ashby may well have been the aggressor for his own political/employment advantage.
Looks like we will now have to wait for the criminal case.

Do you think this ruling might have any bearing on a civil case brought against Thomson.

I can see that you feel that way about every single woman that brings on a sexual harassment case. How do you justify beng a mysoginist.

No, not at all, but good try at diversion.
The difference as I'm sure you well understand is that women, usually follow the correct procedure & report the harassment to the relevant person or authourities, not the media or the persons political foe.
Had Ashby reported Slippers actions to the office of integrity or police BEFORE running off to Liberal Party Headquarters & office of propaganda(daily tele), I probably would not be questioning his motives.

So guilt hasn't worked, whats your next try?

Back to top

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #39 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:37pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:46pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:16pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:06pm:

Gist wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

What's to defend matty and why would anyone be interested in doing that? In fact, why are you interested? Do you think Slipper may want to suck your righty dick?

Beacuse I am merely stating that the texts are sexually suggestive, there's no getting around that. Also, I've been told that Slipper's homosexuality has more or less been an open secret among many in the LNP (or at least the QLD branch).

I don't know if Slipper wants to do that, but it appears that you do.

Slipper should know better than to get sexual with an employee. The poor employee would think that the all powerful boss would sack him if he didn't play along with the boss to some degree.

Once it got too much for the poor employee (feeling sufficiently intimidated and sickened), he then asks for advise from his work colleagues, who he has a natural trust toward and they start to help, in silence.

There is nothing untoward about that scenario and that is why it will be fun to watch yet more labor lampooning.

You play Ashby as the victim, as is your political leanings.
As I have none other then a sense of social justice, I can see that Mr Ashby may well have been the aggressor for his own political/employment advantage.
Looks like we will now have to wait for the criminal case.

Do you think this ruling might have any bearing on a civil case brought against Thomson.

I can see that you feel that way about every single woman that brings on a sexual harassment case. How do you justify beng a mysoginist.

No, not at all, but good try at diversion.
The difference as I'm sure you well understand is that women, usually follow the correct procedure & report the harassment to the relevant person or authourities, not the media or the persons political foe.
Had Ashby reported Slippers actions to the office of integrity or police BEFORE running off to Liberal Party Headquarters & office of propaganda(daily tele), I probably would not be questioning his motives.

So guilt hasn't worked, whats your next try?

So the victim, because they didnt follow proper procedure, is now the perp. Mysoginist much.

It can all be explained out of fear. Thinking/being powerless.

Back to top

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #40 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:42pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:46pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:16pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:06pm:

Gist wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

What's to defend matty and why would anyone be interested in doing that? In fact, why are you interested? Do you think Slipper may want to suck your righty dick?

Beacuse I am merely stating that the texts are sexually suggestive, there's no getting around that. Also, I've been told that Slipper's homosexuality has more or less been an open secret among many in the LNP (or at least the QLD branch).

I don't know if Slipper wants to do that, but it appears that you do.

Slipper should know better than to get sexual with an employee. The poor employee would think that the all powerful boss would sack him if he didn't play along with the boss to some degree.

Once it got too much for the poor employee (feeling sufficiently intimidated and sickened), he then asks for advise from his work colleagues, who he has a natural trust toward and they start to help, in silence.

There is nothing untoward about that scenario and that is why it will be fun to watch yet more labor lampooning.

You play Ashby as the victim, as is your political leanings.
As I have none other then a sense of social justice, I can see that Mr Ashby may well have been the aggressor for his own political/employment advantage.
Looks like we will now have to wait for the criminal case.

Do you think this ruling might have any bearing on a civil case brought against Thomson.

I can see that you feel that way about every single woman that brings on a sexual harassment case. How do you justify beng a mysoginist.

No, not at all, but good try at diversion.
The difference as I'm sure you well understand is that women, usually follow the correct procedure & report the harassment to the relevant person or authourities, not the media or the persons political foe.
Had Ashby reported Slippers actions to the office of integrity or police BEFORE running off to Liberal Party Headquarters & office of propaganda(daily tele), I probably would not be questioning his motives.

So guilt hasn't worked, whats your next try?

Have you no empathy at all?

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

Dsmithy70

Gold Member

Offline

ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #41 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:48pm

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:37pm:

So the victim, because they didnt follow proper procedure, is now the perp. Mysoginist much.

It can all be explained out of fear. Thinking/being powerless.

Well you see this is the problem, we do not know for sure who is the victim.
It might be that much clearer had Mr Asby followed procedure.

It can all be explained out of love of money & power, thinking/doing anything to disgrace the current member so as to instill your benefactor (in this case Brough).

Back to top

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96020
Gender: male

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #42 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:51pm

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:42pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:46pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:16pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:06pm:

Gist wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

matty wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

The lefties still can't defend those blatantly sexual texts by Slipper, can they?

What's to defend matty and why would anyone be interested in doing that? In fact, why are you interested? Do you think Slipper may want to suck your righty dick?

Beacuse I am merely stating that the texts are sexually suggestive, there's no getting around that. Also, I've been told that Slipper's homosexuality has more or less been an open secret among many in the LNP (or at least the QLD branch).

I don't know if Slipper wants to do that, but it appears that you do.

Slipper should know better than to get sexual with an employee. The poor employee would think that the all powerful boss would sack him if he didn't play along with the boss to some degree.

Once it got too much for the poor employee (feeling sufficiently intimidated and sickened), he then asks for advise from his work colleagues, who he has a natural trust toward and they start to help, in silence.

There is nothing untoward about that scenario and that is why it will be fun to watch yet more labor lampooning.

You play Ashby as the victim, as is your political leanings.
As I have none other then a sense of social justice, I can see that Mr Ashby may well have been the aggressor for his own political/employment advantage.
Looks like we will now have to wait for the criminal case.

Do you think this ruling might have any bearing on a civil case brought against Thomson.

I can see that you feel that way about every single woman that brings on a sexual harassment case. How do you justify beng a mysoginist.

No, not at all, but good try at diversion.
The difference as I'm sure you well understand is that women, usually follow the correct procedure & report the harassment to the relevant person or authourities, not the media or the persons political foe.
Had Ashby reported Slippers actions to the office of integrity or police BEFORE running off to Liberal Party Headquarters & office of propaganda(daily tele), I probably would not be questioning his motives.

So guilt hasn't worked, whats your next try?

Have you no empathy at all?

Exactly. Smithy, you should be ashamed of yourself. Don't you feel at all sorry for Mr Slipper's victims?

You lefties have no compassion whatsoever. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government
Reply #43 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:51pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:48pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:37pm:

So the victim, because they didnt follow proper procedure, is now the perp. Mysoginist much.

It can all be explained out of fear. Thinking/being powerless.

Well you see this is the problem, we do not know for sure who is the victim.
It might be that much clearer had Mr Asby followed procedure.

It can all be explained out of love of money & power, thinking/doing anything to disgrace the current member so as to instill your benefactor (in this case Brough).

As all/most cases of women bringing on sexual harassments claims could be seen as. But I dont go shouting from the roof tops, because that would lessen the charge of the true cases. I am not mysoginistic in nature, but what you are suggesting is.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dsmithy70 Gold Member Offline ire futuis vobismetipsis Posts: 13147 Newy Gender:	Re: Ashby claims backfire against the Government Reply #44 - Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:53pm Karnal wrote on Jul 6^th, 2012 at 4:51pm: Exactly. Smithy, you should be ashamed of yourself. Don't you feel at all sorry for Mr Slipper's victims? You lefties have no compassion whatsoever. What a bunch of hypocrites. Na bugger'em Just like Ashby/Slipper From behind & rough.
Back to top	REBELLION is not what most people think it is. REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself. Gavin Nascimento IP Logged