Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's (Read 16970 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49371
At my desk.
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #30 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:15pm
 
Quote:
I did this, but I couldn't find a source to the article, or see where Falah posted it to back up his claims. Perhaps the reference to the "immorality of the dominant culture" gives us a clue about the author. Am I right?


Scroll down a bit to the end of his post:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1338172056/184#184

Quote:
I doubt very much that Falah has the will or the ability to destroy "freedom and democracy"


There are a whole host of problems that could arise before we get to the stage of Muslims overthrowing the government.

Quote:
(if we had this in the first place)


Abu and Falah have recently attempted to argue that we do not have the freedom to criticise the government, so our system of government is therefor no better than the Islamic one, where you get your head chopped off if you speak out of turn.

Are you not sure whether we have democracy?

Quote:
I've never seen Falah advocate violence.


I have seen him promote violence plenty of times. Have you seen the list of people he thinks should be killed?

He does however have some common sense when it comes to keeping his mouth shut. That is why if you ask him what the proper Islamic method is to achieve his goal of Shariah law in Australia once Muslims have the numbers to take over (he thinks this is inevitable), his response will be silence. Or to attempt to change the subject. Or to accuse you of violently overthrowing some other government. You know how it goes.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #31 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:34pm
 
Quote:
I have seen him promote violence plenty of times. Have you seen the list of people he thinks should be killed?


I havent seen it but i have seen yaddas opinion of palestinians. Same thing you accuse falah of methinks. Perhaps they should be both put in a room together.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96412
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #32 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:53pm
 
I know how it goes, Freediver, but I doubt very much that Falah believes the overthrow of the Australian government is even remotely possible.

Falah is a Muslim fundamentalist - the same kind of thinking as Yadda - a Christian fundamentalist. Yadda would also have a list of people he'd like to see tried and executed, but is probably realistic about the likelihood of this happening.

Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though. I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.

If I was the target of this hostility day-in day-out, I'd be inclined to retaliate. I'd try very hard not to, but I'm not perfect. I'd probably feel marginalised. I'd probably get angry. You know the sort of posts I'm talking about - there's a thread about Muslims having the audacity to pray.

When it gets to this level, people get defensive. But they can't win - as soon as they arc up it's evidence of their violent ways. They're expected to take every jibe, and answer every dumb question with equanimity. If they don't, their reaction is proof of their corrupt religion. You do this yourself. You've even created a whole list of their answers as proof - proof!

To me, it demonstrates perfectly how the War on Terror works.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #33 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:56pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:53pm:
I know how it goes, Freediver, but I doubt very much that Falah believes the overthrow of the Australian government is even remotely possible.

Falah is a Muslim fundamentalist - the same kind of thinking as Yadda - a Christian fundamentalist. Yadda would also have a list of people he'd like to see tried and executed, but is probably realistic about the likelihood of this happening.

Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though. I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.

If I was the target of this hostility day-in day-out, I'd be inclined to retaliate. I'd try very hard not to, but I'm not perfect. I'd probably feel marginalised. I'd probably get angry. You know the sort of posts I'm talking about - there's a thread about Muslims having the audacity to pray.

When it gets to this level, people get defensive. But they can't win - as soon as they arc up it's evidence of their violent ways. They're expected to take every jibe, and answer every dumb question with equanimity. If they don't, their reaction is proof of their corrupt religion. You do this yourself. You've even created a whole list of their answers as proof - proof!

To me, it demonstrates how the War on Terror works.


you mean how they round up their children, women and retards, strap a bomb vest to them and put them on buses filled with school children? THERE is a difference.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96412
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #34 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 2:15pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:56pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:53pm:
I know how it goes, Freediver, but I doubt very much that Falah believes the overthrow of the Australian government is even remotely possible.

Falah is a Muslim fundamentalist - the same kind of thinking as Yadda - a Christian fundamentalist. Yadda would also have a list of people he'd like to see tried and executed, but is probably realistic about the likelihood of this happening.

Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though. I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.

If I was the target of this hostility day-in day-out, I'd be inclined to retaliate. I'd try very hard not to, but I'm not perfect. I'd probably feel marginalised. I'd probably get angry. You know the sort of posts I'm talking about - there's a thread about Muslims having the audacity to pray.

When it gets to this level, people get defensive. But they can't win - as soon as they arc up it's evidence of their violent ways. They're expected to take every jibe, and answer every dumb question with equanimity. If they don't, their reaction is proof of their corrupt religion. You do this yourself. You've even created a whole list of their answers as proof - proof!

To me, it demonstrates how the War on Terror works.


you mean how they round up their children, women and retards, strap a bomb vest to them and put them on buses filled with school children? THERE is a difference.


That's right. And Falah's the head of the Lakemba suicide-bombing committee.

Lucky we've got his posts under surveillance, Longy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49371
At my desk.
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #35 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 7:30pm
 
Spot:

Quote:
I havent seen it but i have seen yaddas opinion of palestinians. Same thing you accuse falah of methinks.


Having a low opinion of someone is not the same as wanting them put to death, in my opinion.

Karnal:

Quote:
I know how it goes, Freediver, but I doubt very much that Falah believes the overthrow of the Australian government is even remotely possible.


Not now. In the future he considers it inevitable, and will get very frustrated when he sees it slipping away - far more frustrated than he he gets on here.

Quote:
Yadda would also have a list of people he'd like to see tried and executed, but is probably realistic about the likelihood of this happening.


Have you asked him?

What makes Abu and Falah different is that they have a long list of names, are prepared to follow through with it, are part of a relatively well organised group, and so far have been largely flying under the radar. Our society dealt with Christian extremists centuries ago. We have barely scratched the surface on Islamic extremism. What is especially odd is that so many people who are quick to criticise religion in general (spot is an extreme example of this) are also quick to come to Islam's defence and fairly oblivious to what the Muslims they defend are actually saying.

Quote:
Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though. I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.


That's because you have not read anything like the sort of backwards opinions on freedom and democracy from other members as you have from the Muslims, nor the deceptive ways they try to present themselves as flag carriers for true freedom and true democracy. With Yadda, what you see is what you get. With Abu and Falah what you think you see is usually the opposite of what you actually get. There is a huge difference between your garden variety nutter and someone with a carefully constructed PR campaign around their nuttiness. One type is in a mental asylum. The other is a Hitler.

Quote:
If I was the target of this hostility day-in day-out, I'd be inclined to retaliate. I'd try very hard not to, but I'm not perfect. I'd probably feel marginalised. I'd probably get angry. You know the sort of posts I'm talking about - there's a thread about Muslims having the audacity to pray.


Perhaps you should direct your comments at the people making these claims. It is hard to feel sorry for Falah when he spends most of his time on this forum googling random articles to try to pin stuff on other religions, then carefully editing out any bits that don't suit before he copies and pastes.

Quote:
When it gets to this level, people get defensive. But they can't win - as soon as they arc up it's evidence of their violent ways. They're expected to take every jibe, and answer every dumb question with equanimity.


I would prefer he simply ignored them, like I do with his dumb freeliar jibes. He responds to about every third post from with with an accusation that I am lying that he cannot back up. He seems to handle the dumb stuff well and uses it as part of the Muslim victim PR campaign. What seems to really annoy him are the genuine questions about freedom and democracy, or when he is caught out with blatant lies and misrepresentations - like in the thread on farming and his spin about aboriginal scholars.

Quote:
You do this yourself. You've even created a whole list of their answers as proof - proof!


Karnal, the reason I did this is because they kept denying the things they had said previously. It was incredibly frustrating trying to have a simple debate when their position changed to suit whatever spin they are trotting out and they pretended they did not say things. Like I said, with Yadda what you see is what you get. Whereas Falah and Abu kept demanding I prove that they had said what I remembered them saying the day before. It was their demands that created that list.

What else do you expect people to do? Ignore it when people with an agenda to kill start posting spin on a politics forum and changing their story constantly?

How is what you say any different to asking that people be nice to Nazis because if we call them on their BS it is our fault if they lose it and start killing Jews? It is kind of naive to assume everything will work out better if we ignore this sort of thing or treat it with kid gloves don't you think? When should we start calling them on their BS? When will it be too late?

Quote:
To me, it demonstrates perfectly how the War on Terror works.


You will have to elaborate on this one for me.

Karnal, this debate with Islam in general has very real implications, involving the deaths of thousands of people every year. It is a discussion we need to open up, not ignore and hope it goes away. We are currently involved in two decade long wars, and the only reason we are still there is because we are trying to establish a functioning democracy. If Muslims are fundamentally opposed to democracy and it is doomed to failure - as Abu and Falah suggest - we need to know. If it is 10% of Afghans who are murderously opposed and 90% who want it, we need to know. If the majority will simply turn away as democracy is destroyed because their religion demands it, we need to know. If we cannot even figure out what local English speaking Muslims really want, what hope do we have? If Abu, Falah and like minded people in the Taliban and Al Quaida try to spin it as if they support democracy when in fact the opposite is true, we need to know. These people may not be running the world, but they are powerful enough to draw us and the US into a long war. How many people need to die before we take it seriously? Millions? If we don't even have the balls to ask the tough questions from the safety of the internet, what hope do we have?

The ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would have to be the most farcical in human history. It is monty python class comedy, except for the hundreds of thousands of dead people. When else in history has the victor attempted to establish a popularly elected government in a country they defeated, only to have it violently thrown back in their face, then persisted in trying to help the people? This is the farce we are in, and the things that Abu and Falah have posted here give genuine insight into that farce. Before Abu and Malik turned up my views on the matter were not that different to spots. It was only by talking to genuine Muslims that I gained an appreciation for how backwards the ideology is, how thick and unfamiliar the spin is and how difficult the war on terror will be to resolve. The reason I try to put it out there for others to see in a simple manner is because I did so much head scratching myself trying to figure out what is going on.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #36 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:06pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:53pm:
Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though.



It is ridiculous to compare Yadda to Falah. Just bizarre. There is no political dimention to Christianity that is comparable to the explicit political aims of Islam, for starters. Your reflex equivocation between every religion just to excuse Islam's very unique charactristics is ignorant at best.



Quote:
I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.



Why is there no similar hostility towards Buddhists, Sikhs, Taoists, atheists? Your equivocation ignores actual real difference in the religions, the behaviours of the adherents of each and the resultant aseessment of them by the rest of the population.

Nobody says that Buddhists are hostile towards Western liberal democracy because they aren't. According to a recent survey, the vast majority of people do think that Islam is hostile to Western liberal democracy. Are the same people right in their assessement of Buddhism but wrong about Islam? How could that be and why?

They aren't wrong in either case. Islam is and has always been the enemy of the West, of Christianity, as well as of Buddhism, Hinduism, atheism, animism, Judaism and of course has great internal tensions among its various sects and cults.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49371
At my desk.
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #37 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:09pm
 
Quote:
According to a recent survey, the vast majority of people do think that Islam is hostile to Western liberal democracy.


This includes Muslims.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #38 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:10pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 7:30pm:
Spot:

Quote:
I havent seen it but i have seen yaddas opinion of palestinians. Same thing you accuse falah of methinks.


Having a low opinion of someone is not the same as wanting them put to death, in my opinion.

Karnal:

Quote:
I know how it goes, Freediver, but I doubt very much that Falah believes the overthrow of the Australian government is even remotely possible.


Not now. In the future he considers it inevitable, and will get very frustrated when he sees it slipping away - far more frustrated than he he gets on here.

Quote:
Yadda would also have a list of people he'd like to see tried and executed, but is probably realistic about the likelihood of this happening.


Have you asked him?

What makes Abu and Falah different is that they have a long list of names, are prepared to follow through with it, are part of a relatively well organised group, and so far have been largely flying under the radar. Our society dealt with Christian extremists centuries ago. We have barely scratched the surface on Islamic extremism. What is especially odd is that so many people who are quick to criticise religion in general (spot is an extreme example of this) are also quick to come to Islam's defence and fairly oblivious to what the Muslims they defend are actually saying.

Quote:
Falah and Yadda are minorities in their respective religions. There is a difference though. I have not read anything like the sort of angry, ignorant and relentless attacks on Christianity as I have on Islam - and I'm referring to most of the threads here on the Muslim board.


That's because you have not read anything like the sort of backwards opinions on freedom and democracy from other members as you have from the Muslims, nor the deceptive ways they try to present themselves as flag carriers for true freedom and true democracy. With Yadda, what you see is what you get. With Abu and Falah what you think you see is usually the opposite of what you actually get. There is a huge difference between your garden variety nutter and someone with a carefully constructed PR campaign around their nuttiness. One type is in a mental asylum. The other is a Hitler.

Quote:
If I was the target of this hostility day-in day-out, I'd be inclined to retaliate. I'd try very hard not to, but I'm not perfect. I'd probably feel marginalised. I'd probably get angry. You know the sort of posts I'm talking about - there's a thread about Muslims having the audacity to pray.


Perhaps you should direct your comments at the people making these claims. It is hard to feel sorry for Falah when he spends most of his time on this forum googling random articles to try to pin stuff on other religions, then carefully editing out any bits that don't suit before he copies and pastes.

Quote:
When it gets to this level, people get defensive. But they can't win - as soon as they arc up it's evidence of their violent ways. They're expected to take every jibe, and answer every dumb question with equanimity.


I would prefer he simply ignored them, like I do with his dumb freeliar jibes. He responds to about every third post from with with an accusation that I am lying that he cannot back up. He seems to handle the dumb stuff well and uses it as part of the Muslim victim PR campaign. What seems to really annoy him are the genuine questions about freedom and democracy, or when he is caught out with blatant lies and misrepresentations - like in the thread on farming and his spin about aboriginal scholars.

Quote:
You do this yourself. You've even created a whole list of their answers as proof - proof!


Karnal, the reason I did this is because they kept denying the things they had said previously. It was incredibly frustrating trying to have a simple debate when their position changed to suit whatever spin they are trotting out and they pretended they did not say things. Like I said, with Yadda what you see is what you get. Whereas Falah and Abu kept demanding I prove that they had said what I remembered them saying the day before. It was their demands that created that list.

What else do you expect people to do? Ignore it when people with an agenda to kill start posting spin on a politics forum and changing their story constantly?

How is what you say any different to asking that people be nice to Nazis because if we call them on their BS it is our fault if they lose it and start killing Jews? It is kind of naive to assume everything will work out better if we ignore this sort of thing or treat it with kid gloves don't you think? When should we start calling them on their BS? When will it be too late?

Quote:
To me, it demonstrates perfectly how the War on Terror works.


You will have to elaborate on this one for me.

Karnal, this debate with Islam in general has very real implications, involving the deaths of thousands of people every year. It is a discussion we need to open up, not ignore and hope it goes away. We are currently involved in two decade long wars, and the only reason we are still there is because we are trying to establish a functioning democracy. If Muslims are fundamentally opposed to democracy and it is doomed to failure - as Abu and Falah suggest - we need to know. If it is 10% of Afghans who are murderously opposed and 90% who want it, we need to know. If the majority will simply turn away as democracy is destroyed because their religion demands it, we need to know. If we cannot even figure out what local English speaking Muslims really want, what hope do we have? If Abu, Falah and like minded people in the Taliban and Al Quaida try to spin it as if they support democracy when in fact the opposite is true, we need to know. These people may not be running the world, but they are powerful enough to draw us and the US into a long war. How many people need to die before we take it seriously? Millions? If we don't even have the balls to ask the tough questions from the safety of the internet, what hope do we have?

The ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would have to be the most farcical in human history. It is monty python class comedy, except for the hundreds of thousands of dead people. When else in history has the victor attempted to establish a popularly elected government in a country they defeated, only to have it violently thrown back in their face, then persisted in trying to help the people? This is the farce we are in, and the things that Abu and Falah have posted here give genuine insight into that farce. Before Abu and Malik turned up my views on the matter were not that different to spots. It was only by talking to genuine Muslims that I gained an appreciation for how backwards the ideology is, how thick and unfamiliar the spin is and how difficult the war on terror will be to resolve. The reason I try to put it out there for others to see in a simple manner is because I did so much head scratching myself trying to figure out what is going on.

I agree completely.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #39 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:14pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 1:15pm:
Quote:
I've never seen Falah advocate violence.


I have seen him promote violence plenty of times. Have you seen the list of people he thinks should be killed?




Where's that list?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49371
At my desk.
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #40 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:22pm
 
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337120583

Please add to it as you come across more examples. I have tried getting him to explain just how far he thinks it should go, but he went all shy on me.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #41 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 10th, 2012 at 10:22pm:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337120583

Please add to it as you come across more examples. I have tried getting him to explain just how far he thinks it should go, but he went all shy on me.


Bloody hell!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10266
Gender: male
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #42 - Jul 10th, 2012 at 11:03pm
 
Maybe Karnal can bring his Foucault and do some hermeneutical surgical precision on Islam. Nothing must stand remember, Karnal! All is word games and ideology!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #43 - Jul 11th, 2012 at 6:04am
 
Quote:
Having a low opinion of someone is not the same as wanting them put to death, in my opinion.


What a short selective memory you have. You do not remember him saying they should all be killed and "pushed into the sea"?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: aboriginal muslim scholars of the 1600's
Reply #44 - Jul 11th, 2012 at 6:07am
 
Quote:
It is ridiculous to compare Yadda to Falah. Just bizarre. There is no political dimention to Christianity that is comparable to the explicit political aims of Islam, for starters. Your reflex equivocation between every religion just to excuse Islam's very unique charactristics is ignorant at best.


the religions are almost identical. the comparison is valid.

the cultures on the other hand arent so much anymore. Most xtians cant get away with what the muslims can get away within some countries where the culture is suitable for it. Funnily enough those are mostly occupied countries.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print