Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 ... 36
Send Topic Print
Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post. (Read 37174 times)
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #285 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:57pm
 
... wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
Backed yourself into a corner again gits?


Nah. Just playing with your socks again wesley.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #286 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26500
Australia
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #287 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:04pm
 
I have an idea. How about we do a ppl swap and swap all the ppl that want to leave australia because they dont like all the muslims and the carbon tax for refugees who actually want to be here?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #288 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:04pm
 
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:41pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:35pm:
How many?


You're not able to actually come out and say it are you? Here, I'll spoon feed you, just c&p the following:

"I don't give a sh!t if they all drown. As long as the feckin' wogs don't come here!"

C'mon... you KNOW that's what you really want to say.



Yeah, turn them back, sink the ones that don't turn. Light a bonfire, drink their blood, whatever.



How many would you resettle?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #289 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:08pm
 
Soren wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:04pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:41pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:35pm:
How many?


You're not able to actually come out and say it are you? Here, I'll spoon feed you, just c&p the following:

"I don't give a sh!t if they all drown. As long as the feckin' wogs don't come here!"

C'mon... you KNOW that's what you really want to say.



Yeah, turn them back, sink the ones that don't turn. Light a bonfire, drink their blood, whatever.



How many would you resettle?



As many cheeseaters and ten pound loafers you can throw at us.

How many in your church, old chap?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #290 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm
 
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.


If you cannot communicate your point coherently then the fault lies with you.


What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25823
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #291 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:05pm
 
Since Rudd dismantled the Pacific Solution in 2007:

- More than 20,000 people have arrived by boat
- More than 350 boats have carried those 20,000 people here
- Conservative estimates put the death toll at sea at around 1,000 dead

And Labor and the loony Greens would have us believe that their approach was more "humane" and more successful than that of Rudd's predecessor, John Howard.
Back to top
 

Scott Morrison DID wipe the floor with Bull Shitten!!! Smiley Smiley Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #292 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:28pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.


If you cannot communicate your point coherently then the fault lies with you.


What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


In other words you don't have any solution, just hot air.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #293 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:31pm
 
Soren wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:04pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:41pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:35pm:
How many?


You're not able to actually come out and say it are you? Here, I'll spoon feed you, just c&p the following:

"I don't give a sh!t if they all drown. As long as the feckin' wogs don't come here!"

C'mon... you KNOW that's what you really want to say.



Yeah, turn them back, sink the ones that don't turn. Light a bonfire, drink their blood, whatever.



How many would you resettle?



May as well go for every last one. That'll fix it.

How many would you resettle? Or would you prefer just to machine gun 'em?
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #294 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:46pm
 
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:28pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.


If you cannot communicate your point coherently then the fault lies with you.


What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


In other words you don't have any solution, just hot air.



(6th time) What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #295 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:25pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:46pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:28pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.


If you cannot communicate your point coherently then the fault lies with you.


What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


In other words you don't have any solution, just hot air.



(6th time) What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


(7th time) You don't have a solution, just hot air.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #296 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:29pm
 
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:25pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:46pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:28pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm:
Gist wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:46pm:
So your solution is to ... what? It's still not clear.

I'll ask again (fourth time), what is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?

(I'll answer your question after you answer mine).


If you don't understand what I have written then that's YOUR problem, not mine. Go borrow a brain or something.

And you HAVE no answer which is why you don't want to give it.


If you cannot communicate your point coherently then the fault lies with you.


What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


In other words you don't have any solution, just hot air.



(6th time) What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


(7th time) You don't have a solution, just hot air.


I'll give you my solution after you answer my question. (You could just recall our discussion on this topic we had only a few weeks ago and you'd find my answer. Or maybe your memory is as bad as your cognition?).

What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #297 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:35pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:29pm:
I'll give you my solution after you answer my question. (You could just recall our discussion on this topic we had only a few weeks ago and you'd find my answer. Or maybe your memory is as bad as your cognition?).

What is your pragmatic solution to resettlement?


My memory tells me that you gave diddly squat. My memory tells me that you CLAIMED you would answer after I gave an answer. And then you squibbed. Whodathunkit eh?

But perhaps my memory is faulty, as you say. Perhaps I'm confusing you with one of the other foot odour crowd. You are all so alike after all. So perhaps you could provide a link to this answer you gave. Or perhaps you could not.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Prevailing
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #298 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:37pm
 
There is only one Party that truly represents defending Australian territorial and economic borders and representing the legal Australian citizenship...that is the Rise Up Australia Party... Smiley
http://riseupaustraliaparty.com/
Back to top
 

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men
 
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: Asylum seekers, an argument too good not to post.
Reply #299 - Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:45pm
 
Prevailing wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 4:37pm:
There is only one Party that truly represents defending Australian territorial and economic borders and representing the legal Australian citizenship...that is the Rise Up Australia Party... Smiley
http://riseupaustraliaparty.com/

Is that heil hitler stance an accident?
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 ... 36
Send Topic Print