Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake? (Read 10205 times)
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #120 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:38pm
 
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:24pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


Mate, last time I looked the real scientist were telling us the world is warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. When the science doesn't conform to your world view how about we call it pseudo science, I'm surprised you're not calling it witchcraft.

Yes pretty close to witchcraft with the magic numbers except magic you usually dont see it, but the manipulating of temperature data is easily seen now we know what we are looking at.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #121 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 2:41pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


You mean the vested interests, like those backing the Heartland Institute? That would be the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, who fund "spin campaigns", such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist
 
Real debate is something these sort of people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"! 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #122 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 3:39pm
 
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:24pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


Mate, last time I looked the real scientist were telling us the world is warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. When the science doesn't conform to your world view how about we call it pseudo science, I'm surprised you're not calling it witchcraft.


The world is warming...so what...
"Real scientist"...I'm still waiting for Jolly to name a single signatory with a degree in "climatology".
So last to you looked these climatologists...sorry scientists (I hope there not those ones that Jolly says just walked past a university to get their degrees) were telling us that the world was warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. So that is rejecting the null hypothesis to the .05 or .01 confidence level where we are responsible for 100% of this effect. Because you state this without reference to any other cause and nor apparently do your "real scientists".
Are you just being deliberately misleading?...because I think even perceptions will say that the earth is warming regardless.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #123 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 3:45pm
 
Didn't you people know?

LIEBERALS WILL DECIDE WHAT REAL SCIENCE COMES INTO THIS COUNTRY AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT WILL COME!

It's their answer to everything.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #124 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 9:32pm
 
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 2:41pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


You mean the vested interests, like those backing the Heartland Institute? That would be the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, who fund "spin campaigns", such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist
 
Real debate is something these sort of people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"! 

I would assume that someone like you with a bent to soress would understand.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #125 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 9:47pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 9:32pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 2:41pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


You mean the vested interests, like those backing the Heartland Institute? That would be the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, who fund "spin campaigns", such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist
 
Real debate is something these sort of people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"! 

I would assume that someone like you with a bent to soress would understand.


Gee, you've got me there Progs, PLEASE EXPLAIN?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #126 - Jul 21st, 2012 at 11:29pm
 
tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 3:39pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:24pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


Mate, last time I looked the real scientist were telling us the world is warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. When the science doesn't conform to your world view how about we call it pseudo science, I'm surprised you're not calling it witchcraft.


The world is warming...so what...
"Real scientist"...I'm still waiting for Jolly to name a single signatory with a degree in "climatology".
So last to you looked these climatologists...sorry scientists (I hope there not those ones that Jolly says just walked past a university to get their degrees) were telling us that the world was warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. So that is rejecting the null hypothesis to the .05 or .01 confidence level where we are responsible for 100% of this effect. Because you state this without reference to any other cause and nor apparently do your "real scientists".
Are you just being deliberately misleading?...because I think even perceptions will say that the earth is warming regardless.


Can you clear up the syntax and try again. Are you saying warming has to be 100% anthropogenic to be attributable to us?
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #127 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 9:24am
 
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 11:29pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 3:39pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:24pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


Mate, last time I looked the real scientist were telling us the world is warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. When the science doesn't conform to your world view how about we call it pseudo science, I'm surprised you're not calling it witchcraft.


The world is warming...so what...
"Real scientist"...I'm still waiting for Jolly to name a single signatory with a degree in "climatology".
So last to you looked these climatologists...sorry scientists (I hope there not those ones that Jolly says just walked past a university to get their degrees) were telling us that the world was warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. So that is rejecting the null hypothesis to the .05 or .01 confidence level where we are responsible for 100% of this effect. Because you state this without reference to any other cause and nor apparently do your "real scientists".
Are you just being deliberately misleading?...because I think even perceptions will say that the earth is warming regardless.


Can you clear up the syntax and try again. Are you saying warming has to be 100% anthropogenic to be attributable to us?


You say the world is in peril and the first thing out of you vacuous head is about syntax. Bravo.
Are you saying warming has to be 0% anthropogenic to be unattributable to us?
You make sweeping statements that you can't back up with anything of substance and instead you lapse into being the grammar police.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Online


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #128 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 9:33am
 
WTF id the problem here? Who cares who caused it Its happening and we need to try and fix it or we prolly wont survive.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #129 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 9:36am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 22nd, 2012 at 9:33am:
WTF id the problem here? Who cares who caused it Its happening and we need to try and fix it or we prolly wont survive.

SOB


Only when Alan Jones and Andrew Bolt says its ok
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #130 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 10:26am
 
tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2012 at 9:24am:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 11:29pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 3:39pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 1:24pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 12:41pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 21st, 2012 at 5:26am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:36pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2012 at 3:26pm:
Deniers are just the same fools that buy any old rubbish fed to them by the wealthy and powerful business lobby groups.
We see it time and time again and the only surprising thing is that in this day and age anyone could let themselves be so obviously manipulated.

AGW loons are exaclty like the doomsday cultists. The end of the world is nigh...... cookoo cookoo


Are you still going, progs? I wonder what your vested interest might be. Is it fear of facing your own gullibility or fear of facing reality.

Vested interest is real science, not pseudo science. Real debate, not gatekeeping and especially of all, no to socialists/marxists taking over an agenda and making it their own.


Mate, last time I looked the real scientist were telling us the world is warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. When the science doesn't conform to your world view how about we call it pseudo science, I'm surprised you're not calling it witchcraft.


The world is warming...so what...
"Real scientist"...I'm still waiting for Jolly to name a single signatory with a degree in "climatology".
So last to you looked these climatologists...sorry scientists (I hope there not those ones that Jolly says just walked past a university to get their degrees) were telling us that the world was warming and that with a high degree of certainty we are responsible. So that is rejecting the null hypothesis to the .05 or .01 confidence level where we are responsible for 100% of this effect. Because you state this without reference to any other cause and nor apparently do your "real scientists".
Are you just being deliberately misleading?...because I think even perceptions will say that the earth is warming regardless.


Can you clear up the syntax and try again. Are you saying warming has to be 100% anthropogenic to be attributable to us?


You say the world is in peril and the first thing out of you vacuous head is about syntax. Bravo.
Are you saying warming has to be 0% anthropogenic to be unattributable to us?
You make sweeping statements that you can't back up with anything of substance and instead you lapse into being the grammar police.


Grammar is important. It helps the other person understand what you are saying. Your null hypothesis just doesn't make sense.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #131 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 10:29am
 
Science is for losers..why do we need it when we have a 3000 yr old book written by wandering middle eastern desert nomads to base everything on?
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #132 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 2:39pm
 
For those, who think these LNP LOONS are correct, PLEASE EXPLAIN -

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time & then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.

How is that anything other than best scientific practice?

Currently, the best Climate Change Knowledge is as stated by the United Nations & many Peak scientific organizations, including the following –
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
http://www.csiro.au/

These organizations are basically scientific, unlike the "spin campaigns" of vested interests, such as those mounted by the Heartland Institute, which is backed by the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, fund campaigns such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist

Real debate is something these people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"!

In saying that we should teach what is the best scientific known knowledge of the time, it must also be said that things are seldom final. In fact, they are usually in a state of flux, which is why even the best knowledge of the time, must be subject to scrutiny, so it can be proved or disproved or refined, as new knowledge comes to hand.

That said, IF it or anything else, can't be taught to students, it hasn't got much chance of being proved or disproved!

So, the question is what are these LNP LOONS doing, IF they delete what is currently best know knowledge, from the curriculum?

As Mozza may put it, these LNP LOONS should watch out, because the Climate Change Karma, may just run over their consensus Dogma BS!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #133 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 7:31pm
 
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22nd, 2012 at 2:39pm:
For those, who think these LNP LOONS are correct, PLEASE EXPLAIN -

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time & then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.
How is that anything other than best scientific practice?

Currently, the best Climate Change Knowledge is as stated by the United Nations & many Peak scientific organizations, including the following –
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
http://www.csiro.au/

These organizations are basically scientific, unlike the "spin campaigns" of vested interests, such as those mounted by the Heartland Institute, which is backed by the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, fund campaigns such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist

Real debate is something these people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"!

In saying that we should teach what is the best scientific known knowledge of the time, it must also be said that things are seldom final. In fact, they are usually in a state of flux, which is why even the best knowledge of the time, must be subject to scrutiny, so it can be proved or disproved or refined, as new knowledge comes to hand.

That said, IF it or anything else, can't be taught to students, it hasn't got much chance of being proved or disproved!

So, the question is what are these LNP LOONS doing, IF they delete what is currently best know knowledge, from the curriculum?

As Mozza may put it, these LNP LOONS should watch out, because the Climate Change Karma, may just run over their consensus Dogma BS!

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time & then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.


Couldn't go past that.

We have seen the gate-keeping in the pseudo science of mann-made climate change. It would only get worse in the teachings of said gate-keeping. If you will not allow scientists to prove the theory wrong in the actual science arena, what makes you come up with the absurd statement that you did.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: LNP loons want to burn science at the Stake?
Reply #134 - Jul 22nd, 2012 at 8:07pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 22nd, 2012 at 7:31pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22nd, 2012 at 2:39pm:
For those, who think these LNP LOONS are correct, PLEASE EXPLAIN -

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time &
then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.

How is that anything other than best scientific practice?

Currently, the best Climate Change Knowledge is as stated by the United Nations & many Peak scientific organizations, including the following –
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
http://www.csiro.au/

These organizations are basically scientific, unlike the "spin campaigns" of vested interests, such as those mounted by the Heartland Institute, which is backed by the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, fund campaigns such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist

Real debate is something these people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"!

In saying that we should teach what is the best scientific known knowledge of the time, it must also be said that things are seldom final. In fact, they are usually in a state of flux, which is why even the best knowledge of the time, must be subject to scrutiny, so it can be proved or disproved or refined, as new knowledge comes to hand.

That said, IF it or anything else, can't be taught to students, it hasn't got much chance of being proved or disproved!

So, the question is what are these LNP LOONS doing, IF they delete what is currently best know knowledge, from the curriculum?

As Mozza may put it, these LNP LOONS should watch out, because the Climate Change Karma, may just run over their consensus Dogma BS!

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time &
then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.



Couldn't go past that.

We have seen the gate-keeping in the pseudo science of mann-made climate change. It would only get worse in the teachings of said gate-keeping.
If you will not allow scientists to prove the theory wrong in the actual science arena
, what makes you come up with the absurd statement that you did.


1) I seriously doubt, IF you even read what other people write OR what you write in return. Being able to prove &/or disprove theories, applies equally to the best, current theories, as well as the LOONEY fringe ones!


I assume that you have no sensible answers for the balance of my post & that's why you didn't respond to the other points!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print