For those, who think these LNP LOONS are correct, PLEASE EXPLAIN -

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time &

then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.

How is that anything other than best scientific practice?

Currently, the best Climate Change Knowledge is as stated by the United Nations & many Peak scientific organizations, including the following –
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
http://www.csiro.au/

These organizations are basically scientific, unlike the "spin campaigns" of vested interests, such as those mounted by the Heartland Institute, which is backed by the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, fund campaigns such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist

Real debate is something these people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"!

In saying that we should teach what is the best scientific known knowledge of the time, it must also be said that things are seldom final. In fact, they are usually in a state of flux, which is why even the best knowledge of the time, must be subject to scrutiny, so it can be proved or disproved or refined, as new knowledge comes to hand.

That said, IF it or anything else, can't be taught to students, it hasn't got much chance of being proved or disproved!

So, the question is what are these LNP LOONS doing, IF they delete what is currently best know knowledge, from the curriculum?

As Mozza may put it, these LNP LOONS should watch out, because the Climate Change Karma, may just run over their consensus Dogma BS!

perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2012 at 2:39pm:

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time &

then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.

Couldn't go past that.

We have seen the gate-keeping in the pseudo science of mann-made climate change. It would only get worse in the teachings of said gate-keeping.

If you will not allow scientists to prove the theory wrong in the actual science arena

, what makes you come up with the absurd statement that you did.

For those, who think these LNP LOONS are correct, PLEASE EXPLAIN -

How is that wrong to teach, what is the best scientific known knowledge at the time & then allow students & scientists to prove &/or disprove those theories.
How is that anything other than best scientific practice?

Currently, the best Climate Change Knowledge is as stated by the United Nations & many Peak scientific organizations, including the following –
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
http://www.csiro.au/

These organizations are basically scientific, unlike the "spin campaigns" of vested interests, such as those mounted by the Heartland Institute, which is backed by the Koch brothers, who are big in the Energy game.

The Heartland Institute, fund campaigns such as -
1) Stop Teaching Climate Change
2) There's not such thing as Climate Change
3) The Tea Party (US Ring Wing Political Party)
4) Peak Oil Doesn't exist

Real debate is something these people have no interest in, their only interest is, "SELF INTEREST"!

In saying that we should teach what is the best scientific known knowledge of the time, it must also be said that things are seldom final. In fact, they are usually in a state of flux, which is why even the best knowledge of the time, must be subject to scrutiny, so it can be proved or disproved or refined, as new knowledge comes to hand.

That said, IF it or anything else, can't be taught to students, it hasn't got much chance of being proved or disproved!

So, the question is what are these LNP LOONS doing, IF they delete what is currently best know knowledge, from the curriculum?

As Mozza may put it, these LNP LOONS should watch out, because the Climate Change Karma, may just run over their consensus Dogma BS!

perceptions_now wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2012 at 8:07pm:

If you are going to start off with the most stupid statement first, I suggest you leave it last

so we can have some confidence we are not reading dribble until the very end atleast.

I have as much content as you have provided.