Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2012 at 11:09am:
The simple solution is this: We only take in 'boat people' who can be billeted. This would require those who want them here to volunteer themselves to do the billeting. This way the tax payer only pays for the boat people's processing. After that, the entire financial burden will be on the billeters. It is the responsibility of these volunteer billeters to ensure they are fed, clothed, sheltered, and provided with all other expenses until the 'boat person' can stand on their own two feet in all these departments.
This would include setting up a registrar were people can put their names down and sign binding legal contracts. All at the expense of the humanitarian, not the tax payer. Any excess 'boat people' that cannot be billeted due to a shortage of volunteers will either be granted a temporary protection visa or sent back to where they came from.
This should not be a problem. Because we all know that the humanitarian brigade want them here and they will be only too happy to spend their money on helping these people settle. It's win/win. The humanitarians get to feel nice, warm, and fuzzy inside and the 'boat people' get freed from 'oppression.'
How 'bout we let them read the news and point them in the direction of future employment.
Quote:Overseas Australian jobs 'could rise' in 2010
More Australian manufacturing jobs could be sent overseas in 2010, according to a leading industry organization.
The Australian Industry Group (AIG) has claimed that the sector, which endured a difficult 12 months in 2009, will continue to struggle next year because of the high dollar and rising interest rates.
This, the group suggests, will lead to more companies relocating their operations to cheaper markets in other countries.
[...]
http://www.randstad.com.au/about-randstad/world-of-work/overseas-australian-jobs-could-rise-in-2010
Things have gotten worse since 2010.