Australian Politics Forum - Labor's internal polling numbers

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #105 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 2:51pm

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:26pm:

interesting definition of 'backpedalling' - like everything else you seek to redefine. You tend to be pretty much a logic-free zone.

Only SOB stops you from competing for Stupidest Poster. SOB has that one nailed.

Spot is reasonably entertaining, he'll chat about pretty much anything and he's not so full of himself that he's worried about being wrong occasionally. YOU on the other hand...

I await your explanation of where relativity fails to fit the Truth according to your Factbook.

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #106 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 3:36pm

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:26pm:

interesting definition of 'backpedalling' - like everything else you seek to redefine. You tend to be pretty much a logic-free zone.

Only SOB stops you from competing for Stupidest Poster. SOB has that one nailed.

Spot is reasonably entertaining, he'll chat about pretty much anything and he's not so full of himself that he's worried about being wrong occasionally. YOU on the other hand...

I await your explanation of where relativity fails to fit the Truth according to your Factbook.

Neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light. Tachyons being suspected (not yet proven) to travel faster than light.

The experiment in slowing down the speed of light where the cause and effect law was flipped on its head (light entered the tube AFTER it exited.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #107 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 4:10pm

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 3:36pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:26pm:

interesting definition of 'backpedalling' - like everything else you seek to redefine. You tend to be pretty much a logic-free zone.

Only SOB stops you from competing for Stupidest Poster. SOB has that one nailed.

Spot is reasonably entertaining, he'll chat about pretty much anything and he's not so full of himself that he's worried about being wrong occasionally. YOU on the other hand...

I await your explanation of where relativity fails to fit the Truth according to your Factbook.

Neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light. Tachyons being suspected (not yet proven) to travel faster than light.

The experiment in slowing down the speed of light where the cause and effect law was flipped on its head (light entered the tube AFTER it exited.

So come on... what does your Big Book Of Facts say is the Real Honest Truth then?

And you do realise that tachyons are theory, not fact. It is a consensus among scientists that they may exist. Therefore that "fact" that you quoted is in the "land of the intellectually bereft and the easily amused" where you live.

Also that the stuff you quoted about neutrinos and slowing the speed of light is all part of particle physics. Now what did you have to say about that just now..?? Oh that's right:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Consensus has given us slavery and genocide. non-conformity to the consensus of the day has given us the Civil Rights movment and the entire science of particle physics.

Make up your mind, is it Truth as per your Big Book of Facts or is it hogwash?

In any case, these random selections from your trawling of Wikipedia don't repudiate relativity. I'd like to see the repudiation thanks. I'm expecting something really concrete from you on that score seeing as you have the Big Book of Facts which can explain it all to you in agonising detail.

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #108 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 5:42pm

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 4:10pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 3:36pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:26pm:

interesting definition of 'backpedalling' - like everything else you seek to redefine. You tend to be pretty much a logic-free zone.

Only SOB stops you from competing for Stupidest Poster. SOB has that one nailed.

Spot is reasonably entertaining, he'll chat about pretty much anything and he's not so full of himself that he's worried about being wrong occasionally. YOU on the other hand...

I await your explanation of where relativity fails to fit the Truth according to your Factbook.

Neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light. Tachyons being suspected (not yet proven) to travel faster than light.

The experiment in slowing down the speed of light where the cause and effect law was flipped on its head (light entered the tube AFTER it exited.

So come on... what does your Big Book Of Facts say is the Real Honest Truth then?

And you do realise that tachyons are theory, not fact. It is a consensus among scientists that they may exist. Therefore that "fact" that you quoted is in the "land of the intellectually bereft and the easily amused" where you live.

Also that the stuff you quoted about neutrinos and slowing the speed of light is all part of particle physics. Now what did you have to say about that just now..?? Oh that's right:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Consensus has given us slavery and genocide. non-conformity to the consensus of the day has given us the Civil Rights movment and the entire science of particle physics.

Make up your mind, is it Truth as per your Big Book of Facts or is it hogwash?

In any case, these random selections from your trawling of Wikipedia don't repudiate relativity. I'd like to see the repudiation thanks. I'm expecting something really concrete from you on that score seeing as you have the Big Book of Facts which can explain it all to you in agonising detail.

Please explain this to me. I use Particle Physics as an example of how concensus was a failure and then you refer to this same discipline as a proof of the opposite?

And Tachyons dont suddenly become irrelevent just because they remain theoretical just as the Higgs Boson was theorerticl until recently. Flinders university some years ago performed an experiement that strongly suggested that tachyons with supra-relativistic particles.

What I am saying is that Relativity is not foolproof. I have no idea what you are saying other than disagreeing with everything I say even if it disgrees with what you've said in the past.

Non-integer partial dimensions are what will eventually explain many of the problems of most cosmological models AND supra-relativistic speed issues of some particles.

Back to top

IP Logged

lisa.greek

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1595
Cairns QLD

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #109 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:23pm

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 5:42pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 4:10pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 3:36pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:26pm:

interesting definition of 'backpedalling' - like everything else you seek to redefine. You tend to be pretty much a logic-free zone.

Only SOB stops you from competing for Stupidest Poster. SOB has that one nailed.

Spot is reasonably entertaining, he'll chat about pretty much anything and he's not so full of himself that he's worried about being wrong occasionally. YOU on the other hand...

I await your explanation of where relativity fails to fit the Truth according to your Factbook.

Neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light. Tachyons being suspected (not yet proven) to travel faster than light.

The experiment in slowing down the speed of light where the cause and effect law was flipped on its head (light entered the tube AFTER it exited.

So come on... what does your Big Book Of Facts say is the Real Honest Truth then?

And you do realise that tachyons are theory, not fact. It is a consensus among scientists that they may exist. Therefore that "fact" that you quoted is in the "land of the intellectually bereft and the easily amused" where you live.

Also that the stuff you quoted about neutrinos and slowing the speed of light is all part of particle physics. Now what did you have to say about that just now..?? Oh that's right:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Consensus has given us slavery and genocide. non-conformity to the consensus of the day has given us the Civil Rights movment and the entire science of particle physics.

Make up your mind, is it Truth as per your Big Book of Facts or is it hogwash?

In any case, these random selections from your trawling of Wikipedia don't repudiate relativity. I'd like to see the repudiation thanks. I'm expecting something really concrete from you on that score seeing as you have the Big Book of Facts which can explain it all to you in agonising detail.

'Please explain this to me. I use Particle Physics as an example of how concensus was a failure and then you refer to this same discipline as a proof of the opposite?

And Tachyons dont suddenly become irrelevent just because they remain theoretical just as the Higgs Boson was theorerticl until recently. Flinders university some years ago performed an experiement that strongly suggested that tachyons with supra-relativistic particles.

What I am saying is that Relativity is not foolproof. I have no idea what you are saying other than disagreeing with everything I say even if it disgrees with what you've said in the past.

Non-integer partial dimensions are what will eventually explain many of the problems of most cosmological models AND supra-relativistic speed issues of some particles.

It would be nice if you referenced your posting rather than claiming it as your own.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Labor's internal polling numbers
Reply #110 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:27pm

lisa.greek wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:23pm: