Yadda wrote on Aug 15^th, 2012 at 11:24am:


Oh so because 1 "prominent"muslim says its a race you believe it? Who is gullible? Comon religions are not races.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:22am:


Spot you asked me for a link. I explained to you that the links were already there for you, and asked you what link you wanted in case it was something else. How was that not what you were asking?

When you say you ignored it, do you mean you did not read it at all, or that you read it and somehow decided it was not what you were asking for? Is it perhaps that you simply did not even want to be able to follow links? How exactly did you figure out that it was not what you wanted without also realising they were links? Did you realise they were and then forget again in a short period of time?

A rational explanation would be much appreciated Spot. That way we may be able to figure out how to get you to understand all the other simple concepts we have been trying and failing to get you to understand. If you simply aren't interested in what other people say and want to post your opinions over and over again without having to think about anything, you should let us know so we don't waste our time.

SOB's a SOB.

What can you do?

freediver wrote on Aug 15^th, 2012 at 3:49pm:


You are the one that is "confused". I asked you for a link to prove some statement you made. You responded with a heap of crap quotes from me that had nothing to do with it. Someone ELSE gave me the link - not you.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 16^th, 2012 at 6:15am:


And I asked you what link you were after, and patiently tried to explain to you how to follow the links I had already provided. You can't just demand 'a link' and expect people to know what you are on about.

I have asked spot a few dozen times to back up those claims he made. He always has some excuse for not doing it. Right from when he first made the claims he has pretended to be too confused about what is going on to back them up. Perhaps his strategy is to be the proverbial useful idiot and misrepresent Muslims in a more positive light.

Here are some examples:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 9^th, 2012 at 6:36am:


If you follow the link you can see Abu making excuses for not giving a direct answer about whether he wants Shariah law, and inventing other questions to answer instead. This was pointed out to spot at the time. Yet spot has insisted the whole time that Abu did actually say it. Now that Spot can follow the links, surely it is not too hard for him to quote Abu?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 9^th, 2012 at 11:12am:


Spot do you have anything other than wishfull thinking to justify this claim that Abu does not follow the Koran? Can you link to where I was quoting his book? Or were you just making it up as you go along?

There must be about a dozen pages of debate now with Spot insisting he is right about Abu and pretending to be too confused to actually quote him. His confusion is still impenetrable.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 9^th, 2012 at 11:12am:


no SOB, apostasy does not exist in the christian walk.

only in islam and other extreme cults does it exist

Quote:


As soon as you provide a link where I said that you said that not knowing about the links was to blame for my lying.

See Spot, you are not the only one who can pretend to have a single digit IQ.

Quote:


Spot can only frame his response in terms of religions, because then he gets to make up whatever he wants about them. If he had to phrase his response in terms of people, he might have to admit that Muslims are the only ones on this forum who support the death penalty for apostasy, which would undermine his "all religions are equal" BS.

Now that he can no longer get away with lying about what Abu posted, he is retreating to the safety of vague generalisations.

Run spot run. See spot run.

freediver wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 8:28am:


Now show me where i blamed your lies on not knowing about the links.

SOB