Spot are you suggesting that you accused me of editing your quotes etc, even though I clearly did not edit them and you had no way of figuring out whether I had edited them, but this had nothing to do with your inability to follow links and check for yourself whether I had edited them? Do you normally throw around these accusations without even bothering to check?

Given that you still refuse to back up your claims about what Abu said, even though you can now follow the links, I am beginning to suspect it is the latter. You just make it up as you go along. The reason you went for so long without figuring out how to follow links is because you had no interest at all in the truth.

No Spot I am not going to make the effort any more of proving you said these things when you just ignore me when I do and make up more accusations. I must have have asked you 100 times to back up some of your claims. You started by denying you said it, then ignoring it, then pretending you cannot follow links, and now you are back to ignoring it. All you do is demand other people prove you said it then ignore it when they do.

If your inability to follow links is not your excuse, what is it?

Given that you still refuse to back up your claims about what Abu said, even though you can now follow the links, I am beginning to suspect it is the latter. You just make it up as you go along. The reason you went for so long without figuring out how to follow links is because you had no interest at all in the truth.

freediver wrote on Aug 16^th, 2012 at 5:55pm:


In other words you know you cant link or quote it because you know you lied. . . .again.

SOB

This is what every discussion with Spot looks like

1) Spot says something really stupid.
2) Spot repeats himself, seemingly oblivious to what other people say.
3) Spot changes the topic.
4) Spot denies saying stupid thing.
5) Spot demands people prove that he said it.
6) Spot accuses them of lying, misrepresenting him, editing quotes, quoting him out of context etc.
7) Spot denies that he denied saying stupid thing.
8) Spot pretends to be too silly to follow links.
9) Spot says he isn't interested in links anyway.
10) Spot gets all confused about what the topic is and tries to change it again.
11) Spot demands people prove something else before he will address stupid thing he said.
12) Spot retreats to the safety of vague generalisations and meaningless accusations.
13) Spot ignores topic for a while.
14) Spot says same stupid thing and restarts the process.

freediver wrote on Aug 17^th, 2012 at 7:58am:


Reinterpreting my words to mean what you want them to mean is just stupid.

SOB

freediver wrote on Aug 17^th, 2012 at 8:07am:


1) Freediver asks a stupid question
2) Freediver reads the answer to the question and decides it isnt what he wanted to hear
3) Freediver reinterprets the answer assigning his own criteria to mean what he wants it to mean
4) Freediver attacks the person that answered for answering the question with the updated meaning
5) Freediver quote-mines to "prove" the new meaning - disregarding what the person was actually saying
6) Freediver goes on and on and on and on about how whatever it is means what he wants it to mean
7) Freediver tries to back this assertion up with quote-mined quotes form other threads in other contexts
7) Freediver starts lying about the person that answered the original question on some other topic
8) Freediver engages others to come help him with his quest
9) Freediver and the others all jump on the bandwagon making unfounded accusations
10) Freediver doesnt even have a point

SOB

Spot it only looks like quote mining because it takes you 14 pages to figure out the difference between what Abu wants and what he thinks he can achieve (have you actually figured that out yet?). A rational sane person would get through all of that in a single page of discussion.

I didn't have to go looking for them. They are the same quotes I have been trying to correct you on since you made them.