Here you go Spot. He made it even clearer for you:

freediver wrote on Aug 20^th, 2012 at 1:25pm:


Are you still confused?

well, I guess that is some progress.

So, why is the unpolitically based nonviolent christian movement more dangerous than the politically based violent islam ?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 21^st, 2012 at 10:40am:


Funding also goes to all schools, based on all religions - muslims included.
There is no religion in "normal" schools - you just made that up.
and as for "no gay marriage" - theres never  been gay marriage so I can't see what you're up in arms about.


Sooo...are there any real reasons?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 21^st, 2012 at 10:55am:


Ahh so they've got a choice.  Not like it's "forced down their throats" then is it?  Did it ever occur to you people might want to learn about Christainity?  It is the heritage of most Australians you know.

Quote:


I get the feeling your teachers decided not to teach you a lot of stuff.  It's the same story as on this forum - we try and try but it just doesn't take. 

Not that I actually believe your story, but we'll let that slide.

Quote:


LOL.  Now that's just stupid.  religious schools are consietntly at the upper echelon of grades - how would they do that if they weren't even taught science?

Quote:



meh.  That's your opinion, but you act as though "no gay marriage" is something radical - that they're taking away fundamental rights that you've always had. 
My objection to this isn't "religious" as such, but your support of it is - the egalitarian religion.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 21^st, 2012 at 12:26pm:


How is it not a legitimate choice? 

Quote:


No more or less useful than 'ethics'

Quote:


MODS!!! He said a mean thing... 

Quote:


The only thing that is "telling" about is your idiocy.

Quote:


No, they have the same rights as anyone else. 

Quote:


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 9^th, 2012 at 6:36am:


I see spot has skipped back to step 4. It must be terribly convenient being able to change your mind about what you said like that.

1) Spot says something really stupid.
2) Spot repeats himself, seemingly oblivious to what other people say.
3) Spot changes the topic.
4) Spot denies saying stupid thing.
5) Spot demands people prove that he said it.
6) Spot accuses them of lying, misrepresenting him, editing quotes, quoting him out of context etc.
7) Spot denies that he denied saying stupid thing.
8) Spot pretends to be too silly to follow links.
9) Spot says he isn't interested in links anyway.
10) Spot demands the same links again.
11) Spot complains about links and accuses people of 'quote mining'.
12) Spot gets all confused about what the topic is and tries to change it again.
13) Spot demands people prove something else before he will address stupid thing he said.
14) Spot retreats to the safety of vague generalisations and meaningless accusations.
15) Spot complains that he said it too long ago and he now expects other people to prove something did not happen, rather than him showing where it did happen as he claimed.
16) Spot claims he has already backed up his claims, but does not know where.
17) Spot parrots accusations back at the accuser.
18) Spot ignores topic for a while.
19) Spot says same stupid thing and restarts the process.

Perhaps you need to read it again spot. He is not talking about his POV. He is talking about Shariah law - the one where gays and apostates are stoned to death, regardless of their POV about whether they should be stoned to death. Here it is again for you:

Quote:


Quote:


Spot if you cannot even figure out what people are saying to you what hope do you have of objectively assessing risk?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 21^st, 2012 at 12:48pm:


Did it escape your ken that religion includes ethics?

Quote:


Of course they do.  They can marry a member of the oppsite sex, just like anyone else.  Which is, as we all know, precisely what marriage is.

SOB - you have painted yourself into a psychological cornor long ago.
Which is ok if you are right, but you are decidedly wrong.


You pretend you fear more from xians, who entirely agree with a secular democratic society, than from islam who desire a global wide totalitarian religion based world.

You dislike a non political movement who overall vote against homos getting married, in favour of a political movement drenched with political assassinations who behead homos.

Give it up.